Jump to content

GH: Classic Thread


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

It's actually good casting.  They do look alike.  It's easy to forget they are brothers because ASJ left and he was so absent for Stone's entire illness and death.   I think Karen and Jagger came back early on when Stone was diagnosed, but never again.   The show seemed to purposely minimize the relationship just because the actors weren't available.  But Jagger did name his son after Stone as we found out on Night Shift.  The younger sister played by Nikki Cox (Gina) came back later as a different actress as well in 1997 ish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I never knew Michael Sutton was older.  The return of Karen/Jagger was good at the time.  It's too bad they couldn't work it out to come back a few more times because once they were gone-they were gone and not mentioned very often.  I have always felt Jagger/Karen had so much story still to give when they left-outside of Stone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I just assumed their contracts were up?  I guess it was sudden or a surprise at least for Cari Shayne to leave because they just made Scott her dad.  Or maybe CS was cut because ASJ left?  I can't recall.  I think ASJ always had one foot out the door as the more famous of the two.  I believe Vanessa said she had a 3 or 4 year initial contract, so maybe they changed from the standard 2 year to a longer one for newbies after that since they both were hired before her.  IDK, it was a perfect ending at the time for them, but it seemed like they could have provided a lot more story.  Especially with Stone and Sonny/Brenda heating up-there was a place for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I assume it was a mutual decision with Cari Shayne, unless she was making up something for her benefit - they had no use for Karen without Jagger at that time, IMO. (I know she supposedly turned down a return for PC as well)

I do think killing Karen was always a huge waste. Sabato could've been a decent return to the main show once upon a time, but he's a total joke today.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Idk, I could see a use for Karen with Scott as her dad.  She could have mixed it up with Sonny/Brenda or been involved with Stone's illness and Jason's accident.  There were men to pair her with and family drama to explore.  I have little use for Karen as she did get replaced by Brenda, Robin, Lois, etc as the young female leads, but I do think you could have worked her in somewhere.

 

I can see CS turning down PC because she was booking regular primetime gigs at the time (and may have been playing Matt's wife on 90210 back then?).  CS and ASJ could have made returns to the main show and I agree it was a huge waste to kill Karen off. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Scott (and Serena) left in December 1993, before Karen & Jagger's March '94 departure.

I'd have had Karen be mentored by Alan and/or Monica, or perhaps as a new friend for Laura and Mary Mae. I'd also have Karen learning that Scott's her dad just before the launch of Port Charles. But that's just me.

Edited by Franko
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I forgot Scott was gone lol.  I thought the show was going to make Alan her dad, but I guess that would be weird with her relationship with Jason?    They didn't go very far, but I guess that's icky.  Not sure why the built up Alan/Rhonda though.  Anyhow, I don't think Scott was the initial plan for Karen's dad, but I could be wrong.

I think it would have been a great idea to wait for the launch of PC to reveal Karen's paternity.  Because as it was it was pretty anticlimactic at the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I just can't wait until next week when we can go back to a full weeks worth of episodes. 3 episodes and a mid-week gap has been so difficult to deal with, especially in light of how good the show is.
    • I always hoped they'd change Parker's paternity back to Phillip.  I guess it doesn't matter since Chloe is off the show currently.  I don't recall Holly or Maggie mentioning Parker, so it's not they are close to him. 
    • I’ve reached the summer of 1998.  Until now, my impression has been that the show has steadily improved since the great quality dip of 1994, reaching as high as 8/10 in 1997. Sure, I could complain about a few things in 1997 (Claudia got wasted after her initial storyline; Thorne’s feelings for Taylor were a bit too sudden; the storyline where Sheila lived with James and Maggie while pregnant got rather boring; Mike periodically revisiting Sheila despite being on the run from authorities), but overall it was a very strong year.  I liked the Thorne/Taylor/Ridge triangle, the mystery plot about who shot Grant, the sham wedding to trap Sheila, Stephanie/Eric/Lauren, and Clarke manipulating his way back to working at Forrester. I even liked the Greenland storyline with Eric/Lauren/Rush, although I had expected to hate it. Maybe 1996 tops 1997 in raw soapy excitement (especially as Sheila got a chance to interact with a larger canvas of characters), but certain problems with overall storyline cohesion puts it somewhat below 1997 for me. Unfortunately, 1998 has turned out to be a bit of a speedbump, perhaps on par with 1995 levels of quality: - Maggie’s character really got trashed after James left her to be with Sheila, and the early 1998 storylines where she imprisoned Sheila in the house from Psycho, or installed those wires and mikes and such in her house to make her think she’s going crazy, were total GARBAGE. So much so that the latter storyline (and Maggie with it) pretty much disappeared into a limbo.  - I have mixed feelings about the twins plotline with Lauren. No way did Rush survive being shot with a crossbow through the chest, and the romance between Lauren and Rush’s good twin brother Johnny was rather dry to me. I did however enjoy the camp aspect of Rush taking his brother’s place to be with Lauren, and Eric rescuing her. But it doesn’t appear like Bell cared too much about the Johnny/Lauren romance beyond the twin storyline gimmick, and it too disappeared in an unsatisfactory manner (come on, why not hire Johnny’s actor for just 5 more episodes for an arc where he realizes Lauren is not over Eric, or JUST SOMETHING?) - Clarke wormed his way back to FC in late 1997, which had exciting storytelling potential, but then he disappeared almost entirely. Sad to see my favorite character wasted in this manner. Does he get anything interesting to do between now and the Morgan saga of 2000-2001? - The Thomas saga was entertaining in 1997, but it got stretched out too much, and made some of early 1998 tiresome, with Ridge having to decide YET AGAIN which woman he wants to be with. On the plus side, I like the plotline of Thorne being neighbors with Macy and Grant, and we’ve finally been introduced to the SORASed Rick/Amber/CJ crowd. The Stephanie/James/Sheila triangle is also starting, and it makes me excited (I remember seeing some if it in my childhood). I know Sheila, Grant, and James are all leaving soon, which I honestly kind of dread - between them and Clarke’s near-absence, it feels like herd is going to get culled too much in the near future. But I know there’s the familiar 1999-2002 to look forward to.
    • LOL - this is a perfect description, and that's what I loved about it! May be a bit campy, but it immediately caught my attention in a good way.  I'm not familiar with the Fishing Trip storyline, I'll have to look that up. I've noticed that about Josh, which has made him less attractive to me overall. He just yells a lot when he's not happy. Wow, Reva was married to HB!  LOL - "Always... eventually, and again"
    • I love your ideas. I would love to see Jack grown up this confused unhinged individual. He should hold a grudge against both Brooke and Taylor.   
    • @chrisml

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Lois's return has been a bust. So disappointing that the writers have never written for her. As with Tracy, the pool of GH vets is so thin, there's no one to pair her with. Doubtful they would go to the trouble of properly recasting a legacy character and then sticking  him with Lois; they're obviously not that invested. If she wants to be on this show, it'll be as a noisy grandma who stays in the background. 
    • I love me some Anita and TT. They need to give her a good storyline and I know that it's coming. 
    • @Franko Thanks for tagging me. A few days ago I was talking in another thread about the rise of "snarky" critics for TV shows in the '90s online recaps, but this is just more along the lines of a mauling. There's also the unspoken reality that films like Steel Magnolias were seen as movies for women, so therefore they sucked. Pauline Kael also had her share of blunt, at times incredibly nasty remarks, but the vitriol is often balanced by her love for film. I'm not seeing that here.  With that said, the comment about Field's work becoming unbearable describes how I felt when I tried to sit through her and Maura Tierney on ER. 
    • I skipped most of Daniel too. I think it's awful he has kids with Nicole, Csrky5 and Chloe and Brady, Bo and Philip do not. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy