Jump to content

What was the fatal blow to your show?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

ATWT: Many, many reasons:

1) The dismissal of Martha Byrne

2) The death of Ben Hendrickson in real life

3) The idiotic transformation of characters (e.g. Damian Grimaldi, Vienna Hyatt, etc)

4) Hiring ABC "names" (Roger Howarth, Stuart Damon, Lynn Herring)

5) A constant trotting out of useless minor characters (Audrey, Dani, Spencer, Evan Walsh IV, The Z Twins, Ameera, Professor "Scarf")

6) Letting a great character like James Stenbeck be killed by a useless, annoying twit like Audrey Coleman.

7) And last but not least, that godawful Ciccone Clan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

So true about GH agressively rewriting history! The Rick Webber return and Heather's obsession with Luke with were the most ridiculous. I mean, I watched GH religiously from 1978 til 1986 and I don't recall Tony Geary and Robin Mattson ever sharing a scene together. The Rick Webber was a huge head-scratching WTF! Short-term shock value stunts that are executed with little thought about how they ruin the integrity of the characters and the show turn viewers away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

AW: I agree that the 90 min. expansion and Texas spinoff hurt AW, but the show still went on for another two decades. Not sure how that was the fatal blow.

Most people would say Frankie's murder in '97. That definitely had an impact but a few months later AW wrote out John Bolger and Robin Christopher whom were a fan fave couple. The show then went on to write out Kale Browne/Anna Holbrook/David Forsyth. They were all popular vets that drove story for years! (Didn't Matt Crane and Robert Kelker Kelly leave around this time voluntarily? Tho Matt returned near the end.)

This was a mass exodus for a show already on the brink. I feel this is what put them over the edge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

B&B: Fear of change. Taylor/Ridge/Brooke is death. You could see the moments, around ten years ago, that they threw potential development out the window, when Brooke and Thorne broke up and she went after Ridge again. This is what led to the endless stories about Brooke being debased, which are the epitome of not knowing what to do with a character. They went on to repeat the same story with Stephanie again and again, with Amber...any attempts to create a new dynamic were hesitant and short-lived. Brad Bell's need for a security blanket has destroyed any of the soap essence. It's just a brutal circle interspersed with trite "issue" stories Brad uses to show everyone what a great guy he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Was just going to say that. Even in 2003 (which was still a great year) you could see and feel the rot setting in.

It's painful that Alden is back in the Bell universe and not writing for Y&R but being wasted away at B&B. If there is ever any person that can possibly restore the show to what it was, she's it. Although I'm afraid there might have been just too much damage done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In a way B&B almost changes too much. How many young ingenues have they thrown at Rick? How many failed relationships is Bridget gonna have? How many new families has B&B introduced in the past 10 years to take the place of the Spectras? How many random men is Taylor going to have sex with in between marriages to Ridge?

Every 2 years it's like a whole new cast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it's always been a superficial change. They were starting to make permanent, needed changes in the late 90's/early 00's and they backed off. Since then they bring people in and never want to do anything with them, unless they can be used as some type of wooden figure women can be thrown at (like Nick).

They go back to Brooke/Ridge/Taylor, Stephanie/Brooke wars, so many times, they have done an incredibly poor job of developing the kids of B/R/T, it is incredibly bizarre that Stephanie and Eric have four healthy, living children and only 1 ever gets a storyline.

I think Brad Bell also looks down on the type of fun and flair the Spectras used to bring. His ideas of camp are just tacky and borderline offensive, and for some reason now they seem to involve some type of quasi-rape.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it was the decision to gut the Matthews family. They were AW's core family and viewers were deeply invested in most of them. They were also a contrast to the rich and powerful, without being an overly pronounced contrast, the way the Frames were. The Frames were also populated by actors who wouldn't stay around, whereas most of the Matthews probably would have.

The show tried again and again to build a new family unit and it never worked. They just had Mac and Rachel, and their kids, who had to be aged and aged until finally Jamie was pushed off the show, and then the friendship ties of Cass, Felicia, and their loved ones. There was still something of a void. So the show was put in a position it shouldn't have been in, where someone like Frankie was pushed into being this huge heart of the show, when no show can survive putting one character in that place. It's the same thing that killed GL when they decimated years of family and continuity and all that was left was Maureen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There had been mistakes made on B&B before this, but I remember in 2003 that, while I still very much enjoyed the show, a lot of stories felt like stuff thrown against the wall in the vain hope that something sticks. It was relentless. Macy went through 7 years of storyline in less than a year. Her return from the dead, the reconciliation with Thorne, Thorne sleeping with Darla and getting her pregnant, Macy's hysterectomy, her hook-up with Deacon, the baby custody stuff, her death... all stuff that wasn't necessarily bad but the pacing hurt incredibly and made it all feel desperate and like they were grasping at straws. To top it all off, there was that death that was never shown, but then there was a memorial, it was all handled so badly. Let's not mention Sheila's return (what a horribly executed and paced piece of crap) and Nick coming in and all the hoola.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'll go even further. For me it was killing off Taylor the last time. I dont know but the show lost alot of heart for me when they did that. Bringing back Macy felt like the only thing they could do to make up for that at the time but then they went and killed her off within a year again

I think out of all the soaps, surprisingly B&B is the most consistent. No matter what they do, they ALWAYS default back to Stephanie, Brooke, Ridge, Eric and to a lesser degree Taylor. They always reboot things back to how they once were. At the core, things are still very much the same way they were 20 years ago. Brooke and Taylor are still fighting over Ridge. Stephanie is still trying to get rid of Brooke. The other Forrester kids continue to be ignored. These are like core B&B themes that unfortunately never change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Y&R - I always say Bill Bell stepping down as head writer, though the show was still good, it wasn't as good after he left. Kay Alden going was the true end though, the show fell apart after that. Honestly it would have been great if the show ended with Jill and Kay being forced to live with each other and the Abbotts getting back Jabot and Victor and Nikki reuniting etc... the storylines in 98/99 could have easily wrapped up the show and it wouldn't be the tragedy it is today.

Days - I would say JER, I do like the possession stuff and Kristen and co. but it changed the tone of the show and it was never the same, I will say he did a great job with the other stories around that time, though Hope/Gina was a bust to me.

B&B - The endless Taylor/Ridge/Brooke triangle. If they had sense they would have had Brooke and Ridge marry in 1997 and have Taylor give birth to Thomas without Brooke knowing Ridge was the father, then maybe have Brooke have some complicated disease that caused her to be sterile making Taylor the only one who ever had Ridge's child, thus continuing the triangle without the back and forth. Brooke going after Thorne and the total decimation of her character was ludicrous. After the marriage to Grant and the nervous breakdown they should have redeemed the character. Then they should have moved on. At that point they should have focused on different characters more such as Macy's new found family, that didn't seem to last long, I also agree the pacing of stories has been terrible and the incestuous tone of the show is laughable to most casual viewers I talk to.

I guess these are more JTS moments, though I think it was around these periods these shows quality declined and that is what has ultimately caused the erosion of viewers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But is that damaging or consistency? Brooke made quite a bit of progress in her relationship with Thorne only for her to go right back to Ridge for no reason. The same thing happened to Taylor in her relationship with Nick. It's gotten so bad that the show feel suffocating whenever one of the characters gets into a "new" cause it will eventually end up with them regressing anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I feel like the lawsuit storyline was resolved quickly because the show didn’t want to spring for more sets.
    • It's been a while, but we have seen the foyer to Bill and Hayley's house as well as the exterior entrance to their house. The foyer was first seen in the premiere episode when Hayley met Vanessa at the house.
    • There's still a year or two before Larkin arrives. Joel is there already. EON does noticeably youthify, although I think they carry it off. Admittedly I haven't seen most of the Jody stories, which from what people here have said aren't great.
    • I don't mind the actor who plays Brian. He's fine. The problem for me is that Paige seems so wishy wishy. She doesn't seem to have much of a personality at this point so I don't see why Brian would be so besotted with her. She just lurches from one trauma to the next. Granted, it's only been a month, but she's not as vibrant as April or even Deborah who has had minimal screen time by this point.  I do worry about the influence of GH on the show since I'm in fall of 1979 and characters have conversations and there's not the drive to "youthify" the show. However, I think Marceau (sp?) is gone. He was given a rather tame sendoff. How long was the actor on the show? I hope this is not a sign of things to come. I worry the show is setting up a murder mystery around one of my favorite characters and I will be mightily annoyed. I also noticed in recent Search for Tomorrow episodes uploaded to YT that the actors playing Logan and Eliot showed up. I don't watch the show but they were in the screencaps. When does Larkin Malloy show up or has he already left? Joel Crothers hasn't shown up either unless I've blinked and missed him.
    • Dr Linden. She treated Vanessa's drug addiction (although Vanessa seemed to forget that by Henry's suicide attempt) , and she's mentioned during Reva's PPD. Although I can't recall if she's actually shown right off the top of my head. She probably was temporarily shelved when Sonni was a therapist (between her crazy times) And I think Billy sees her after he falls off the wagon after Reva's death.
    • Kinda agree. I have some issues with the sets. Nicole's living room is bland-looks like a display home. Bill and Hayley's is too small and basically hideous. And neither of them have a front door/entrance or staircase. People just appear from the corridor. Those green accents  at Uptown are way too much. Also,Naomi and Vanessa not having an office or a home .
    • Thanks @Paul Raven  That Grainger story always reads like hog-wild melodrama, not very similar to the more subtle stories for Rita in her last few years. I wonder how Lenore played the material.
    • More from 1976 Lynn, apparently making every effort to overcome her alcoholism, accepts a baby-sitting job. However, when the baby starts crying, Lynn begins to get nervous and takes one drink, then another. By the time Bruce and Van arrive home, Lynn is on the floor, ineffectually trying to find the doctor’s number, sure the baby is ill. When the mother arrives; she vows to let everyone know what goes on in the mayor’s house.Bruce insists that Lynn has to go, but Van, learning that Lynn can’t remember drinking the cooking sherry, calls Joe to report Lynn’s blackouts. Joe wants her institutionalized but gives in to Van’ s pleas that Lynn needs loving attention. Eddie has sent some of Felicia’s work to a New |York gallery owner and reports to Charles that Lisa Cooper wants to exhibit Felicia’s work. Charles refuses to tell her this and later admits he feels he has “cowed”her attention because of his being confined to a wheelchair. What Charles doesn’t say is: that he’s plagued with fears she’ll leave him for another man. Felicia is exuberant as she starts painting again. She tells Charles how she feels about it, but, jealous of anyone or anything that takes attention from him, Charles tries to undermine her confidence. Eddie finally professes his love for her. He will be happy to step forward if she will only let Be and admit that they belong together. Charles tries to stop Felicia’s ‘trip to New York by making her doubt her own work, and when that fails, he finds business reasons at his bookshop to keep Di, his ex-wife, who is running it for him, from accompanying her. Felicia finally decides it’s not going to work and tells Eddie they might as well call it off. Instead, he arranges for Lisa Cooper to come to Rosehill. Charles is rude and insulting to Lisa when she arrives at the house to view Felicia’s work, and his derogatory remarks about shady gallery dealings prompt Lisa to tell Eddie that living in such an atmosphere could permanently stunt an artist’s development; if Felicia is subjected to this indefinitely, it’s not even worth Lisa’s while to take her on as a client. Felicia finally decides she can’t be torn apart any longer and must accede to Charles’s demands. She tells Eddie her career is over and she won’t paint any more, breaks down in his arms, crying bitterly, then pulls away, unwilling to acknowledge that her feelings for him are deeper than she dare face. Charles is delighted when she prepares to dispose of her art supplies, insisting everything will be fine once she has accepted that this part of her life is over. But she cannot do it. She promises him that he can set the limits and terms, but she must paint. Arlene discovers that her mother is planning to avoid the surgery she needs, and the accompanying medical bills, by leaving Rosehill and moving in with her sister Dorothy out west. Arlene manages to prevent this by calling her aunt and telling her the truth about Carrie’s condition. Dr. Tom Crawford has been footing the costs of Carrie’s presurgery tests, but Arlene knows that Carrie won’t like this. So she tells Carrie that David Hart, the son of Meg’s late husband, the former mayor, has heard about their plight and forwarded the money as a gesture of friendship, to be repaid when possible. To convince Carrie that she does indeed have the money, Arlene asks Ray to just lend it to her for a few hours, so she can convince Carrie and then immediately return it. Ray instructs her to get dressed for a night on the town and takes her, out implying that the money will be waiting at the end of the evening. When Ian Russell happens to join them, Arlene doesn’t suspect anything is afoot, but when e Ray suddenly leaves, she becomes furious, realizing what he’s done. But she finds Mr: Russell a distinguished and cultured man, and decides there’s no harm in having a drink. After cocktails and stimulating conversation, Ian suggests that they go to his place, and Arlene agrees. But when they get there, Ian matter of factly suggests that they skip the preliminaries and get on with it. Ian is embarrassed and annoyed to discover that Arlene is not a professional call girl and that Ray didn’t explain to her the purpose of their |meeting. He is apologetic and solicitous, until Arlene, explaining why Ray felt he could pull this on her, mentions her sick mother in need of an operation. Ian starts to laugh at this overworked standard line, and a livid Arlene storms out of his apartment. Thinking it over, Ian decides he’s more intrigued with Arlene than he is annoyed at Ray, and calls Ray for her telephone number. But Arlene is not delighted to hear from him, and he has to use a good deal of soothing charm before she agrees to have dinner with him at one of the better local restaurants.During dinner Ian again apologizes for his mistake, and he gives Arlene a diamond pendant as a token of his gratitude for her forgiving him. Ray arrives to interrupt an otherwise enjoyable evening with a business matter, and quietly reminds Arlene that Ian is his customer and she’s not to cut herself in with him. At home, Arlene examines the pendant and is convinced that it’s genuine. She hides it in her dresser drawer, unable to bring herself to show it to her mother.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy