Jump to content

Cancellation Most Devastating to Genre: GL, ATWT, AMC, or OLTL?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Is the question which soap cancellation signaled the end to daily daytime soaps? If that's the question, then I will agree that it was the end of ATWT. The show itself had been garbage for years, and deserved to end, but I think that when it's cancellation was announced, people noticed that it had been playing ratings musical chairs with GH, Days, AMC and OLTL for years. It was probably the first time that people noticed that less than a million viewers separated the soaps between third and last place, and that there was really a statistical tie for last between every soap not produced by the Bells.

I don't think it can be GL, because even though it was the oldest show on the air, I think most people knew that it was way past its expiration date. The show no longer looked like it was produced by professionals, so its decline was more noticeable. But, with ATWT, people finally saw what mattered, the numbers, and noticed that they were the same for every soap. Even Y&R's numbers look bad, when people saw how few 18-49 year olds tune into the show.

AMC and OLTL's ratings are pretty much the same, so it's hard to make an argument that one deserved to go, but the other didn't. ABC is a business, if they thought that OLTL could make them money, or that the demo ratings could actually grow, the show would not have been canceled.

For a period of about a month, but the yearly ratings tell another story. ABC didn't make their decision based on what OLTL has done over a four or five week period. More importantly, OLTL being on par with the other soaps just stressed the fact that the ratings for all of the shows are bad. None of them can survive by drawing so few 18-49 year olds, and around 2.5 million or fewer total viewers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I would say canceling both AMC and OLTL was the most devastating. It got rid of 2/3 of ABC's line-up just like that. I think the writing is on the wall for the rest of the soaps with GH being canceled very soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

While devastating, I don't think AW's cancellation was the most devastating to the genre. I think AW can be grouped with other popular long running soaps like EON, SFT, and The Doctors as a particularly *big* cancellation of its time. I think AW's cancellation lends itself more to the natural attrition of soaps and perhaps seems more devastating because it's fresher in our minds (especially for those of us under 40).

I also think that the cancellation of EVERY soap (ten or so) save for B&B that was introduced in the '80s and '90s was particularly significant, an indication of more devastating times to come. All of the genre's saplings kept getting ripped from the ground and those grand old trees kept on growing, the maintenance becoming costly and in some cases not worth it (the wrong branches getting hacked off along the way <_< ), until they were chopped down or mercifully struck by lightning, however you wanna look at it.

That said, I think the cancellations of GL and ATWT were VERY palpable hits, especially when it comes to the iconography and nostalgia factor of U.S. soap operas. But I think the dual cancellation of AMC and OLTL was the death blow, that in so many words said, "This soap thing is over. It's really over."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes. And plus, the ratio of cut soaps to new soaps went crazy. From 1970 to 1999, basically 30 years, there was at least one soap getting the axe (or a "retooling") every two years. That was fine in the 70s and 80s when they were being replaced by other soaps. There were, just counting network daytime, thirteen new soaps from 1970-1984. Since then? Six. Less than half.

They're cutting down trees, hacking the wrong branches off of the ones still standing, and they refuse to dig 'em up and try replanting them in another yard where the sun might shine on them better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Okay, I'm just going to bang my usual drum here. It's not the cancellations that are devastating to the genre. It's the stagnation and lack of evolution. Cancellation is just a fact of life but the devastation comes from the fact that there's nothing to replace them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The larger issue is the fact networks gave up on the soap genre when they stopped premiering new soaps.

AW was replaced with PASSIONS so AW cancelation can not be said to be the start of some downward sprial

nor can NBC's lack of replacing SUBE as NBC previously went with a 2 soap lineup after SB's demise and

before SUBE's premiere from 93-97. The fact ABC gave up PC's timeslot I believe is the most devestating

cancellation as it started this trend of no new soaps to replace a canceled soap. As NBC didn't replace

Passions, CBS didn't replace GL and ATWT and now ABC not replacing AMC and OLTL with new soaps.

Forget which soap still had life in it or some other fan-based biased opinion lol its the fact networks

gave up on investing in new soaps that killed the genre.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, yes, yes. I agree with everything you said. Another World was, like SFT and EON, a casualty of poor decisions made by the network, the powers-that-be, etc. It was devastating at the time because it was the first long-time soap since Search for Tomorrow in 1986 to be axed (unless you consider Ryan's Hope or Loving to be long healthy runs for soaps, which were '89 and '95 respectively) but it didn't signal the end for soaps just yet. True, soaps had begun their decline in 1999 but there was still *hope* for the genre to bounce back in some capacity. And like someone else said, Sunset Beach ending and thus leaving NBC with only 2 soaps wasn't a new thing either because it had run with only DAYS and AW from 1993-1997. It wasn't til a full ten years later that another longtime show was axed (GL in 2009).

Although it didn't start the domino effect, Port Charles ending and NOT being replaced with another soap was definitely an alarming sign.

I think Guiding Light's death was devastating for the genre because it was the first of the 8 longtime soaps (yes, I'll include B&B as one of the longtime and once-healthy) to be cancelled and replaced with something on the network (instead of giving the timeslot over to the affiliates) and for the networks to realize that they make something for super-cheap and still get the same amount of viewers. GL was also the longest-running show in broadcast history. It was the FIRST of the REMAINING survivors to go. Yes, we soap fans who watched it day in and day out could see the shoddy quality GL had become, but from an outsider's perspective or former watcher's perspective, having this big piece of television history extinguished was truly the beginning to the domino effect.

But like others have said, AMC and OLTL have a younger audience. GL and ATWT were grandma's shows, while AMC and OLTL were their daughter's shows. Yes, they've all gotten older, but the longtime fans for AMC/OLTL are a full generation younger than ATWT/GL, and they still make more of a buzz; they let themselves be heard, whereas CBS Daytime fans in general have been more passive. Like one of my friends once said: ABC Daytime has fans. NBC Daytime has rabid fans. CBS Daytime has viewers.

But AMC and OLTL's double-whammy cancellation gets mainsteam America talking and noticing and discussing that this once-vibrant genre of television is coming to an end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Exactly.

AW was cancelled for a soap no matter what opinion one has of that particular soap. NBC was still interested in the soap business when they cancelled AW, and replaced it with Passions.

However I believe it was shortly after that, perhaps when ratings for Passions were proving to not be that great, or around the time of Port Charles's cancellation, that the networks seemingly gave up on replacing their cancelled soaps with new ones, instead choosing to go for talk shows, game shows, or in PC's case giving their airtime back to affiliates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Great points, which I really hadn't thought of previously. I never watched Passions so I can't debate the merits of it (or lack thereof) but I know that it was considered to be creatively different enough from the rest while still maintaining the soap structure to be considered a "new kind of soap." In retrospect, I guess it makes sense that its failure to succeed would have a chilling effect on networks' plans for any new soaps. The writing was probably on the wall as far as the execs were considered by then. It was going to be too expensive to try anything new to draw a new generation of fans so maybe they were willing to ride it out with the remaining shows until the revenue they generated dried out. Structurally they might have tried something different but maybe the risk was too great that they'd lose their existing (but aging) audience and end sooner. Who knows...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Can you point me to a source on this? Because I find that hard to believe. Even though we didn't get demo ratings back then, Loving always seemed to skew older and SB, with its glitzy glossy production values & Dynasty-esque camp, always skewed younger. I'm just not buying it.

I'll buy the first set of ratings, but the second set doesn't seem right to me. I don't remember Loving EVER jumping almost a full ratings point in a matter of week. Can you provide a link or scan of the article you're getting your information from? I'm not calling either of you liars by any means, I'd just like to see a source. :)

ATWT, which I only watched on and off in the mid-90s and didn't get hooked on until 2000, devastated me even more than SB and AW being canned. I watched SB from 85 until the end and LOVED it. But the last 8 months were so disappointing and the ending so AWFUL (with nary a mention of Cruz & Eden) that it actually took away some of my sadness, as I was worried how much worse it would have gotten under that regime (Rauch/Long). AW was on a creative upswing and I was LOVING it for its final year and a half or so and it probably hit me a little harder than SB. I grew up with AW- some of my first memories are watching DAYS and AW in 1982. I'd spent 17 out of 20 years of my life watching that show and it hurt.

But what made ATWT more devastating for me personally is that there wasn't another soap I could turn on and become as invested in anymore. Somewhere along the way, ATWT became my soap and I fell in love with practically every character in the cast. Plus, IMO, ATWT got good again in the Spring of 2009, after a slump since mid-06, and I was 100% hooked on it. It was miles above the other shows in 2010 and, though I still have DAYS, the quality of DAYS was nowhere near that of ATWT when it left the airwaves. The returns of Carly & Vivian gave me some hope for the future, but we all know how that turned out.

When SB went off the air, I fell in love with Y&R and it filled the empty space in my heart that SB left. I got my camp & humor from B&B at the time. And when AW left the airwaves, B&B was experiencing a creative renaissance, much of which was due to the epic Thorne/Brooke romance. Why the show never revisited that is still a mystery. But with ATWT gone, no soap was there to fill the void- Y&R had turned to sh!t, DAYS wasn't the same, and B&B lost me years ago.

I disagree that ATWT was garbage for years. IMO, the show got really good in mid-09 and even though Janet was overexposed, overall, I felt the quality was very good before, during, and after its cancellation.

^^^YES! THIS!!

Agreed. We felt it when ATWT was canned and AMC was moved to LA, but the simultaneous cancellation of AMC & OLTL was the nail in the coffin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...
  • Members

I completely agree. I remember hearing back in 1994 that Guiding Light might get cancelled, yet it stayed on the air another 15 years even though the ratings and quality got progressively worse. I agree with Kim Zimmer, who believed no one wanted to be the one who pulled the plug on this legendary show. Once it was pulled, the domino effect started.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it was definitely AMC/OLTL b/c they were more popular soaps among younger people and ABC Soaps always had the most devoted fans out the networks over the years.

AMC and OLTL's cancellations never seemed to rest as rumors were still going on for three months until they were saved just yesterday. Fans kept on fighting in large numbers and I think that kind of support definitely made shockwaves through the media. I always knew personally once the ABC soaps were canceled we wouldn't hear the end of it from its fans.

GL was lying on a deathbed for years and years and ATWT was always going to follow suit whenever the hammer was laid down on GL so people expected it.

AMC and OLTL's new internet deals have a chance to actually give this genre a rebirth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The show is done. It got canceled at the end of January. https://www.soapoperanetwork.com/2025/02/fox-first-run-cancels-dish-nation-person-place-or-thing-pictionary-759232
    • I believe it. ESPECIALLY that last one. 
    • Aristotle Dumas. Just thought I'd throw that out there!  
    • Lol is that like an AI type of thing that popped up?

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Upton introduced a slew of new characters which must have had viewers heads spinning. And then Jean Holloway wrote all of them out. No wonder viewers switched off. And now we return to Love of Life... Charles, after a long period of refusing to admit he’s paralyzed, has had to accept his new life in a wheelchair, but insists that only Felicia care for him. Despite her growing exhaustion, he refuses to consider hiring a nurse, and Felicia, under the weight of her self imposed guilt forfeits her art work to accede to Charles’s demands and devote herself entirely tohis needs. She tells herself that being a prisoner in this house is her punishment and refuses to allow her mind to drift to Eddie, who had opened her mind to new levels. Despite Dr. Cusack’s insistence on additional help after Felicia’s first collapse, Charles continues to insist that only she can administer to him. But Felicia collapses again, this time with viral pneumonia, and a nurse is brought in. Felicia’s condition worsens instead of improving, causing Joe to speculate that it’s due to Charles’s subtle encouragement of Felicia’s guilt feelings and her own self-punishment. Eddie visits her, even though they decided not to see each other any more because of the emotional pull between them. In the delirium of a spiking fever Felicia calls out for Eddie. Joe feels she has reached a crisis and wants her in the hospital, but Charles is still clinging to her. When Felicia finally passes the crisis point and recovers, Sara warns her that she called for Eddie and must be more careful in the future.  The district attorney charges Ben with fraud and conspiracy. Meg puts up his bail. As Arlene, terrified of jail, is taken into custody, Carrie has an attack of chest pain. Ben continues to try to prove to Betsy that he loves her and has grown up, but circumstances continue to make her question his motives, and she rejects his overtures. Arlene, questioned by the court officer preparing the court report, cynically states that the rich, like the Harpers, always get away with everything and she will take the rap. She accidentally slips and mentions the forged divorce papers, and the officer notes this.Carrie is hospitalized. Joe suspects a dangerous thoracic aneurism, but then, all heart involvements are dangerous. Arlene wants to stay, but has to go to court for the sentencing. Ben, at his own insistence, makes a statement absolving Arlene of all responsibility, saying her only crime was loving him too much. The judge takes this into consideration and sentences Arlene to six months probation. However, when sentencing Ben, he explains that new evidence has turned up—the forgeries—and Ben is sentenced to one to four years. Ben asks to begin serving his sentence immediately. As Ben tried to arrange financial aid for Betsy through Jamie, she visits him in jail, saying the offer was “decent” but this is her baby. When he insists the baby was conceived in love, Betsy claims he was only pretending love. When Ben tells her to tell the baby that “there was a father who would have really welcomed him into this world,” Betsy rushes out in tears, and Ben starts to cry. Jamie, having waited patiently for Diana to recover from her emotional depressionn,now tells her he can no longer live with her as brother and sister. Diana replies that they have good memories and have taught each other how deep a relationship can be, but now it is time for them to go their separate ways. Meg, learning that the child of an annulled marriage is legitimate and the father has rights, sets up a trust fund for Betsy’s baby. Betsy doesn’t want her child ruined by money. Arlene is having trouble holding a job, despite help from her parole officer, and is under the twin pressures of having to repay Ray’s bail loan and the stunning news that Carrie’s necessary surgery will cost over ten thousand dollars. Carrie, discovering this, checks herself out of the hospital. Joe and Dr. Tom Crawford explain to Arlene that the money end of the surgery can be handled through the free clinic, but Carrie must have the surgery now. But Carrie’s past due hospital bill has been turned over to a collection agency, and Arlene is out of work again, so she goes to Ray for help. He would like to turn her down, as he has discovered that she was informing Rick of Ray’s attempts to muscle in on Skylar Mountain, but when his influential customer, Mr. Ian Russell, tells Ray he wants to meet that girl, Ray lets Arlene know he has a job for her. Meg asks Rick if they can start over together, but Rick has had it and is clearing out his desk. Learning that Ray has withdrawn his backing offer to Rick and that Rick has no available cash, Meg calls his bluff. She sets a price on her share so high that Rick can’t touch it, and sets her price for buying him out so low that he would have nothing left. Rick and Cal decide to elope and tell everyone afterward. But Meg gets wind of the plans and confronts them in Rick’s office. She blurts out that Cal is not the only one who loves Rick and that she and Rick were lovers as recently as a month ago. Rick tries to explain to Cal, but she is revolted and takes off in her car. When she runs it off the road, she takes off on foot, and is found, exhausted, by a hunter, who calls the highway patrol. When Rick arrives with Joe,. she refuses to let Rick anywhere near her. Cal refuses to believe Rick’s assurances that he’s really through with Meg, and makes plans to go to San Francisco. Meg, learning from Jamie .that Rick is severing their partnership, informs her lawyer that she wants all monies in both Beaver Ridge and Skylar _ Mountain tied up, and she wants Rick ruined. Rick follows Cal to California and tells her he has given up everything to prove that Meg means nothing to him. Cal insists that she feels nothing, but relents when Betsy calls, confirming everything Rick has said. She then admits that she loves him but says it won’t work. But Meg has followed them and confronts them in Cal’s hotel room. She informs Rick she’s bringing a suit against him for breaking up their partnership and this will ruin him. Rick quickly points out that Meg just defeated herself rather than him, because Cal had refused to marry him, thinking her mother loved him. Seeing what Meg’s “love” is, there is no reason for Cal to deny her own love for him.  
    • fyi. there is some discussion of the views of the new Pope Leo on the "politics thread". (Link) 
    • The poster said "update", so they were likely following up on their own post on this thread about Pope Francis' funeral.   That is all.
    • This is probably an unfair generalization, but I do say it with affection: I've always thought of Felicia (and by extension, Linda Dano) as "your mother's fabulous but slightly insufferable friend." Sort of a Godmommie Mame, you know?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy