Jump to content

OLTL: Character SORASed


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Just to rub it in after the Kish purge debacle, I'd make Jack bi if it was up to me. But you would probably have to age the character up anyway to do that. It was an edgy enough idea in 1992 when Chris McKenna's Joey was to be a gay teen who looked like a young teen. Today it's almost unthinkable, at least on daytime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That would be a good story -- it could also be used to bring CJ back. They're cousins and CJ would be a con artist and probably fairly sexually ambiguous, and Jack would then look at his life and start to go along with his own instincts, in bisexuality, in conning people and using what he can to get by in life.

(I'm not saying this would be Jammy or whatever, just that their lives would contrast and Todd could blame CJ, this might bring Tina back, etc.)

Or they could involve Rex, as back in the day Rex was pretty obviously screwing anyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would actually bring C.J. back as a pretty straight arrow - so to speak - as a gay Navy SEAL who had worked with Brody overseas. He is now of course reveling in the repeal of DADT. Perhaps he would join the force. But he, along with Larry's very wayward grandson, would end up initially being romantic spoilers for Kish-on-recurring (or on short-term contracts) in a storyline involving their new family - the younger Wolek being a wild child who attracts Kyle, while C.J. is a law and order contemporary of Oliver's. Inevitably, Kyle and Oliver would reunite stronger than ever and probably remain on recurring, leaving the two new young gay men on contract with their own storyline.

By contrast, two or three years down the road from now Jack would be in the teen tier; you'd just happen to have a bisexual teen who has little to do with the older gay characters. He would be caught up with Shane and Jamie Vega. Both boys would be into Jamie, and Jamie would be a more scheming type than straight-laced Shane, leaving him at a disadvantage vs. Jack - but Jack would also have a crush on some other boy. I figure Jack would have to be unrepentantly out, which is something I don't think anyone has done with a teenager in that age range, at least not on American television. You could always have him inadvertently sent to an "ex-gay camp" and tear the place apart, in order to work out my own personal rage against anti-gay gulags like "Love In Action." I imagine Todd would have a conniption about Jack's sexuality and Jack would just blow him off. Who knows, maybe they'll hire some Chandler Massey type to play NuJack and this will all work out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Last I heard, Antonio was on international assignment with the feds, hunting Carlo Hesser. Which left R.J., Carlotta and possibly Rachel in charge of Jamie. This may have changed - I seem to recall a recent mention of Antonio.

Were it up to me, Jamie would be raised by R.J., Carlotta and Rachel while Antonio and the feds continued this quixotic pursuit. You could well bring KDLR in later as a guest star to cap some of that stuff off - the Carlo story has not been properly resolved, IMO, and involves more people than Antonio.

As per Jack or Will Roberts or anyone else, there's something inherently incendiary about showing a young teenager, male or female, as gay on TV, but it's happening all the time today IRL. I remember reading a political blog recently and seeing a video of some out gay kid who could not have been more than 14 or 15 speaking very eloquently about the anti-gay policy in place at his school. I couldn't imagine a kid that age doing that when I was in HS (not that long ago!), it was jolting to me, but it's the arc of our times and I think a soap that reflected that would be on the cutting edge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I know some of y'all really like Brooke Kerr, and so I've tried to give her a shot, despite her frequent flat line readings and distracted "did I leave the front door unlocked?" facial expressions. But lord, she is so bad at playing a tough-talking badass that I was actually rooting for Brad today to spill the beans to Drew. 
    • Googling does tend to ruin it.  For those of us who were teens in the late 1970s and early 1980s, you can't imagine how much fun it was to watch the show in the afternoons.  (It came on right after school.)  There weren't any "spoilers" at the time.  We would always try to anticipate how each crime and each mystery would be resolved, and we were ALWAYS wrong, because the stories are filled with so many weird twists and turns.   The head writer (Henry Slesar) and his dialogue writer (Steve Lehrman) invariably toss genuine clues directly into your face in the most unlikely ways, but then they provide a host of "red herrings" to completely confuse you and send you off on the wrong path.  Once the story reaches its conclusion, all you can think is Why didn't I figure that out weeks ago?  lol
    • Does the vault have the original scene and not the short flashback?
    • I appreciate that you are using AI with the knowledge of it's limitations. Some posters take everything it produces as fact.
    • And of course Mama Ru herself appeared on All My Children.
    • The Saturday 8pm slot usually had the lowest rating of the NBC 4 sitcom lineup for some reason. NBC let Saturday night fizzle, They used 9.30 pm to launch 227 and Amen, both of which moved to earlier in the evening but they  kept Empty Nest following GG for several seasons.  Empty Nest should have moved to 8pm with their strongest new sitcom at 9.30, anticipating that GG would eventually falter. Instead they left them there and stretching the sitcom pool too thinly on other nights. When Grand talk over at 9.30 Thurs maybe Night Court and Wings could have been used on Saturday.
    • @Maxim Great to see your mini-reviews again. There are a number of clips on Youtube of Janice's slow mental breakdown, especially as we go into January 1980. Christine Jones is just superb. She played the hell out of that role. Something which isn't referenced as much later on is how Mitch pushed Janice's doubts and mental instability for his own ends...until suddenly he didn't want to anymore (I guess he caught on with the audience and the show became wary). I don't want to post a bunch of clips, but this one has a very good confrontation between Rachel and Janice.

      Please register in order to view this content

      This has a good scene around 7 minutes in where you can see Janice struggling internally with her need to identify herself so much by the men around her, all of which helps lead to her crackup.  
    • It really made Oscar the Doorman seem like an imbecile.   I think the show's unusual format & subject manner is what makes EON often seem less "dated" and "old-fashioned" than other shows from that time period.  It never attempted to be especially "trendy" or "modern" -- and its film noir style is pretty timeless.  
    • Dallas, Dynasty, Knots and Falcon Crest all had good runs but by 85 they had seen better days. I think they were a victim of the format. After several seasons seeing the same characters front and center viewers were bored. What was once fascinating grew predictable. JR, Alexis etc had to be front and center and after a while their schemes and shtick grew repetitive. JR remarrying Sue Ellen, Alexis constantly trying to get he better of Blake etc Unlike daytime, there wasn't the flexibility to bring in other stories and characters and maybe let the likes JR go backburner. That same mentality also invaded daytime with characters like  Sonny and Victor still peddling the same stuff after decades. I guess the same could be said for MSW eg every week Jessica encounters a crime and solves it,but I think viewers come to that format with a different mindset.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy