Jump to content

November 15-19, 2010


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I know that fans were not overly happy with Pratt but the ratings were far strong and on the up swing at about the time he was let go. Haven't watched very much AMC, therefore am a poor judge, but didn't mind his style of storytelling. He seemed to be a strong writer, just not the right fit for AMC. This must have been something personal between Frons and Pratt. Also, sort of suprised that Pratt did not end up working for another soap--might be a good replacement for Hammer or Hogan on Y&R. Personally, I would have loved seeing him picked up by ATWT because anything would have been better than those two final years of Gout and Piss.

Shocked that B&B beat OLTL in 18-49 and I say beat, instead of tied, because B&B actually gained 2,000 viewers while OLTL lost 33,000. I still question whether a real ratings 'tie' is ever really possible. For a long time, B&B was demo-challenged but the new teen beat cast seems to be helping. Bell did a good job with casting and Bold is undergoing a major reboot. Thom is totally nu-Ridge. Hope they don't mess up by pairing him with La Amber.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I couldn't disagree more about Pratt and I'm reasonably sure his firing had more to do with Agnes Nixon or someone else associated with the network than Frons. I can't remember how it was worded at the time, but it seemed obvious that it wasn't Frons' choice. Pratt was writing Frons' style of plot-driven dreck with no pauses for the characters to reflect on what just happened or to remember their own pasts. I can only imagine ATWT under Pratt; Lucinda would've gotten involved with Holden ala Erica/Ryan. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Under Marland, Lucinda got it on with Craig (her daughter's man) so a Holden story wouldn't be such a reach. With the correct wardrobe, Hubbard looked pretty good and it would have been nice to see her get some real story as well as action. Pratt at ATWT was meant tongue and cheak only because he was good at boosting demos and, in addition, anything would have been better than the Goutman/Pissy pen. By 2009, the writers of Dora the Explorer would have been an improvement.

Didn't think Dixon had any real control? Isn't her role symbolic? ABC daytime seems to be the domain of Frons alone. I seriously doubt higher ups at The Mouse House care much about AMC. Also, it seemed as if ratings were on the upswing so what was the motive behind the firing? My only guess was that Frons wanted a clean slate, new direction for the move to LA. This or that Frons felt, after the pancake murder spree, that Pratt didn't have the chops for such a major transition.

Agreed, and I love the word dreck ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I never understood the whole Pratt firing other than rumors that the cast was not happy with what he was doing and they had limited access to him to discuss storylines. But what he was doing as awful as it might have been did at least have a short term positive impact on ratings. It's likely they wouldn't have held but Pratt is the master of big stunts and event so maybe a disaster every 6 months would have kept AMC more afloat ratingswise than what they've been doing.

What's disappointing is the fact that no one wants to risk alienating any of the remaining viewers by making a courageous writing choice, hiring a new young talent, that could take the shows in a new direction. They just seem content to wait out the end of this generation of the genre. I guess that's the safest approach in today's television climate. There aren't shows getting 20-30 million viewers in primetime anymore(aside from big sporting events)there are too many other options and daytime suffers from the same thing. My my biggest complaint is how dated the storytelling is on soaps today and how they continue to rely on what they consider soap staples, many of which are no longer relevant in 2010. Personally I am actually looking forward to what comes next. Some of the websoap stuff hasn't been too bad. I don't know if that's the future but it is something different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

However, the "future" keeps getting delayed by network people renewing sh!tty soaps and rewarding dismal ratings. Because, first they need to die and after death comes a resting, quiet period and then something new might pop up. It's like a fire in the field: the plants become carbonized, but they do not grow all green and flowery tomorrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I haven't watched GH in eons but I am actually saddened to see Vanessa's return really taking a dive. I love Vanessa and I honestly wish she would have never returned. Her last return was triumphant, she helped raise ratings, she won and emmy an left with her success. This go around, I can only imagine how dismal her story must be knowing GH to take a dive this badly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can't believe everyone was calling OLTL's cancellation this year and it is number 1 ABC soap in viewers LMFAO. OLTL is showing signs of survival and also considering it's ABC most profitable soap. OLTL was underbudget three years in a row and GH/AMC are grossly overbudget. Vanessa's return worked so well back in 2002 because her return was very impactful. The setup was great for Brenda's return which brought big ratings all the way through. This go around the magic is gone and I think alot of it has to do with Vanessa was gone only 4 years last go around and this time it was almost 8. Plus the return has been so badly written. GH IMO NEEDS WENDY RICHE back at the helm. I would kill anything to get Wendy back to Port Charles where she so belongs. Also on the AMC front we can all blame Donna/David but when does JHC GET SOME FREAKING BLAME. This is this woman's fourth writing team and its failing. This woman has absolutely NO VISION WHATSOEVER. That's the problem because if u have been here as long as u have and four writing teams have failed under u, it shows its more then the writing team. AMC is in DESPERATE NEED OF A NEW EXECUTIVE PRODUCER WHO WANTS TO PROVIDE A VISION FOR PINE VALLEY AND ELEVATE THEIR WRITING TEAM. So IMO you could have great writers come in and still it wouldn't go to the top without someone to really want to push the show up. The show needs a leader not some PUSHOVER.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The preaching seems to end before the Barnes settle in late December, 1981. The stuff that felt overly religious (the Davidsons believing a miracle will save Lori rather than a surgeon, Jeff's miraculous recovery from a beam of light) was quickly nixed because it wasn't working. The closest thing that you get to that under the Barnes is when Dennis Fraser, the drunk driver who killed Nora and Scott, turns his life over to god. The born-again redemptions out of nowhere seem to stop fairly early into the Barnes' run. I do think Miriam's transformation was much more delicately done with her turning on her bestie Nancy because Nancy was seducing Charles, Miriam's wealthy father, so Miriam offers to testify for the Davidsons in the trial against Nancy over possession of Nora's house. In turn, Nancy repays the favor by pumping an emotionally distraught Miriam with barbituates while Miriam carries on her affair with low level thug turned political aide Norm Elliott. Miriam is used by everyone into her life and finally lands herself in the hospital becasue she has become so addicted to the pills. At the hospital, it is the friendship and kindness of the Davidsons that brings Miriam to a more peaceful place. The Davidsons ability to forgive is both appealing and, at times, dramatically limiting. In this case, the Davidsons lead Miriam to her new Mama, Ione Redlon. Now, under Vinley, Miriam is determined to reconnect with her son, Frederick, and her ex-husband, Paul.   My bigger issue with the Barnes' writing is that they write the storylines with twist endings that sorta come out of nowhere. I know the resolution to the Kate Carrouthers mystery sorta plays out like that so I am curious to see how I feel about that.  The biggest change throughout the writing teams has been the view of morality. Winsor had many characters who could be viewed purely through the lens of black and white, but others explored the shades of gray (often younger people). The brief head writerless period was much better at embracing an action doesn't make a person and there characters were much more gray or at least evil at a more local level (Nancy, in this period, only flirts with her brother-in-law where as later she is actively providing pills to Miriam to keep her addicted and away from her own father). The Barnes, for the most part, seem to embrace this level of political corruption that seems to permeate throughout the show making it clear that power (as well as money) is the root of evil. Even criminal Vince Cardello is presented as less evil than Charles Carpenter, though Carpenter's murder of a resident of his complex was rewritten to relieve Carpenter of any responsibility in the matter. Vinley's work seems more into exploring the why or delving deeper in general. Babs Farley, the hooker who is looking to reclaim her life, is such an intriguing character. She is given such meaningful monologues regretting her decisions and desperately trying to keep away from the hands of her former pimp, Ron Washington, who hasn't appeared yet. Monk and Fernandez seem to be wrongly accused of Lori's attack and there seems to be hints of racism that the show is looking to address. Marianne confronts Gil about his feelings towards God in relation to their mother's death years earlier.  There does seem to be a layer of misogyny to Vinley's work, but it's early so I'll be curious to see how this plays out. There are a lot of attacks on women (Lori is nearly raped, Babs was beaten, Nancy is on the verge of being blackmailed for sex by Tab, and the Russ / Marianne / Gil scenario has hints of toxic masculinity. It's very early so it'll be neat to see if that is maintained.  Jerry TImm lasts about a year I think (March, 1982 - March, 1983). One of the episodes on TouTube has a comment suggesting that Timm was fired by CBN because he had done something in his past that came to light. It didn't seem to be clear what that was.  I like what I've seen of Timm as Gil. He has such a presence that it covers up some of his weaker acting choices. It's unfortunate that he didn't get to play as much of the Gil - Stacey - Amber triangle as his replacement does.  
    • I believe it was Mark Arnold's family that taped all the shows. It was the same with Ariane Muneker - her mother bought a video recording machine in the 1970s, at a time when that type of technology was really expensive John Wesley Shipp's parents also taped all his shows, and has a complete library of every single episode of every soap JWS has appeared on. Same for Cynthia Watros. When the Soap Actors parents pass away, and there are all these VHS tapes in dozens of boxes, it is shame to waste all that. 
    • Personally, I felt that the deletion of the original music from the girls' slumber party episode, and the axing of REM's Losing My Religion from the ep featuring Brenda and Dylan breaking up, were the most painful. The changes really damaged those episodes. I dropped the DVDs after season two, but I've been told by other viewers who kept going that tunes from all the seasons continued being replaced, and the situation only got worse as the DVD releases progressed. Yes, penny-pinching from those in charge was the principle issue, but I wonder how much better the DVDs would have sold if such poor choices had not been made in the name of cost cutting. On the other hand, when Time-Life put out the Vietnam-war era classic China Beach, they dug deep into their pockets and ended up clearing the rights to a whopping 268 (!!!) of the original tracks. This represented 96% of the total. TPTB said that when they were not given permission to use a few of the remaining pieces, they substituted different singers' versions of the exact same songs, in order to preserve the show's integrity as much as possible. The CB set was expensive as heck, to be sure, but to me it was worth it.
    • Oh I knew it was common (I did not realize Muenker's channel was gone - I'm glad I saved all those videos). I just didn't realize it was the case with the rape episode.  I never really felt like she dominated the show in her second stint either, although I can see where she probably did. I can feel it more in some of her first run, because the show was much different before she came in and suddenly a woman we'd seen for a year was [!@#$%^&*] and marrying an entire family.  In that sense Reva is more like Babe than Erica Kane. One of the more infamous AMC lines was, "Babe is love." You just know HB would have said that line about Reva at some point.
    • I disagree; if this were Chris Clenshaw, then I would be worried. But it's a new producer coming in to clearly create the canvas they want to create, and I'm okay with that. Re-introducing characters to shake things up and possibly take some other ones out of the canvas. It'll be interesting to see the finished product.
    • I am ready for our first full week in what feels like a while! They worked Sweeps month!
    • Beyond the Gates: A The Bold and the Beautiful: F Coronation Street: B Days of Our Lives: B- EastEnders: A+ Emmerdale: A- Hollyoaks: B+ General Hospital: C Neighbours: C+ The Young and the Restless: F For me, Beyond the Gates, EastEnders, and Emmerdale led the pack during Sweeps month, with Coronation Street and Days of Our Lives following. General Hospital and Neighbours sit in the middle with what I'd call a "take it or leave it" kind of Sweeps month, and the Bell soaps bombed (per usual).
    • Actors doing this is pretty common. I used to work for a company that produced a very successful sitcom back in the 70s. Actors who were guest stars on the show would ask to be provided tapes of their episodes. I assume they do it for a variety of reasons, i.e. to create a reel of their best work. I know of some soap actors who have uploaded saved work to YT. One is Ariana Muenker, who played Christine Valere on GL. She was uploading scenes from her many soap roles a few months back. Unfortunately, it looks like either she or YT took the channel down. Sharon Gabet and Mark Arnold help the EON YT channel by providing saved episodes. Along with EON eps, Arnold shared a guest stint he did on GL. Those episodes are really interesting because they involve the introduction of Nola's character, which was tied to the Roger storyline. When he came back after faking his death, he hid out at the boarding house. Nola being a snoop figured out something was fishy with him. She ended up helping the police. Very worth seeking out. I don't think anyone else has those episodes.  Makes you wonder if there's more out there than we know of because actors don't want to be bothered to run a YT channel. Can't blame them because it's a lot of trouble, but if only... I agree. While Lucci definitely used her fame from the show to build her brand and get work outside of AMC, Erica was always part of an ensemble. Yeah, she got a couple of whacky stories (like the "unabortion") but she never took over to the detriment of other actors and stories.
    • It must have been sometime in the early 80's. VI said he first heard about Marj Dusay's talent from CH. Hickland worked with her on Capitol.
    • Not having watched AMC was one of the reasons I hesitated to make the comparison, tbf. It's odd--I feel like I could argue Cassie, Olivia, Harley and Dinah suffocated the show along with Reva the last five years.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy