Jump to content

October 4-8, 2010


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 213
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Unfortunately, I can see that happening but I hope it doesn't.

1.(1) Y&R: Monday: 3.6/5,144,000 (+682,000)

2.(2) B&B: Monday: 2.2/3,068,000 (+136,000)

3.(4) GH: Monday: 2.0/2,738,000 (+623,000)

4.(6) OLTL: Monday: 2.0/2,621,000 (+596,000)

5.(3) DAYS: Monday: 1.8/2,409,000 (+129,000)

6.(5) AMC: Monday: 1.9/2,394,000 (+286,000)

1.(1) Y&R: Tuesday: 3.3/4,877,000 (-267,000)

2.(2) B&B: Tuesday: 2.2/3,135,000 (+67,000)

3.(3) GH: Tuesday: 1.9/2,676,000 (-62,000)

4.(4) OLTL: Tuesday: 1.9/2,604,000 (-17,000)

5.(6) AMC: Tuesday: 1.8/2,267,000 (-127,000)

6.(5) DAYS: Tuesday: 1.7/2,207,000 (-202,000)

1.(1) Y&R: Wednesday: 3.5/5,081,000 (+204,000)

2.(2) B&B: Wednesday: 2.2/3,126,000 (-9,000)

3.(4) OLTL: Wednesday: 2.0/2,666,000 (+62,000)

4.(3) GH: Wednesday: 1.9/2,527,000 (-149,000)

5.(5) AMC: Wednesday: 1.8/2,483,000 (+216,000)

6.(6) DAYS: Wednesday: 1.8/2,448,000 (+241,000)

1.(1) Y&R: Thursday: 3.4/4,770,000 (-311,000)

2.(2) B&B: Thursday: 2.3/3,205,000 (+79,000)

3.(4) GH: Thursday: 1.8/2,500,000 (-27,000)

4.(3) OLTL: Thursday: 1.8/2,495,000 (-171,000)

5.(5) AMC: Thursday: 1.8/2,401,000 (-82,000)

6.(6) DAYS: Thursday: 1.7/2,279,000 (-169,000)

1.(1) Y&R: Friday: 3.5/4,997,000 (+227,000)

2.(2) B&B: Friday: 2.2/3,065,000 (-140,000)

3.(5) AMC: Friday: 1.8/2,612,000 (+211,000)

4.(3) GH: Friday: 1.7/2,413,000 (-87,000)

5.(4) OLTL: Friday: 1.7/2,410,000 (-85,000)

6.(6) DAYS: Friday: 1.7/2,348,000 (+69,000)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They started working in March so wouldn't their 26 week cycle (if they are on 26 week cycles) have been up in September?

At this point I could definitely see Frons giving up on any more HW changes (assuming he was ever really trying). When the show was "exciting" under Pratt (eg. endless explosions, punches, gun-waving, death threats, etc) people complained: "The story moves too fast", "Too much is happening off-screen", "It's too plot-driven", "Where's the character motivation?". His response: "You want a show where all everyone does is sit around and talk about their feelings and everyone's actions are completely predictable? Fine! Here you go!". And what has the reaction been? "The show is boring!"

I think in Frons' mind he has tried what he thought the show needed (Pratt) and that didn't work (although actually it sort of did work ratings-wise), and he has very reluctantly tried what the fans (and some senior actors) were adamant the show needed (or at least his interpretation of what they said the show needed) and that hasn't worked either. So what else is there to do? (Of course there is middle ground and that's where the show needs to be, but I don't think Frons gets that).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

From what Errol posted here a while back it appears the budgetary mess is a bigger problem than demos being somewhat below OLTL.

It appears all the big AMC promotions last fall and early this year attracted back many long-time viewers. The problem is they've been bleeding younger, new viewers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can't really say I agree. AMC was making slow, steady progress then the show made an abrupt uturn back to the Fronsian formula. I keep thinking of the "You should see us in 2010 campaign" they did at the beginning of the year as a way to try to lure lapsed viewers back and for a while they were offering those lapsed viewers something good. Now it's back to the same thing that drove them away. Ryan, Greenlee, Kendall and soon Zach front burner everyday. All that's missing is Aidan Devane.

Do you really believe Frons has done anything as a result of what he thinks viewers want?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest dc cubs

That's its saving grace right now. If Days costs weren't this low it would be canceled for sure with these ratings. The other thing that works to Days advantage is that NBC's new talk show Nate Berkus is only pulling in a 1.0 HH rating per TV by the Numbers. I can't find any solid ratings info on Real Housewives reruns on NBC but I don't think they are pulling in better numbers or we would have heard about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think people are pointing fingers in the wrong direction with DAYS. The show can't have a must-see episode every single day of the week, and when the episodes get a little boring, viewers stop watching at the drop of a hat. Or one couple will split up, and thousands of people will stop watching. The writers are in a tight situation with making any kind of change without offending the few viewers they have left. Then when nothing changes, those same fans deem the show as boring and stop watching.

I've seen a lot of crap on DAYS over the years, but not enough to stop watching. I can only imagine if the other TV shows I watch had to produce new episodes 5 days a week all year that they wouldn't be perfect either. And these same "fans" who stop watching complain even more when the budget gets cut so they have to release some of the higher paid actors/actresses like Drake and Deidra. There's no winning with "fans" like these.

I give props to how well they have tied so many characters and storylines into the Chloe/Daniel angle (who knows she cheated, who knows who it was with, who will be effected by the break-ups). But I guess people don't give a sh** about solid storytelling, they just want their must-see TV every single day or they get their panties in a bunch and take off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • It sure was!  With respect, how does that make sense?  These men are young, I don't see that. 
    • I hope this played better than it sounds, because I'm imagining two separate scenes (the attack by Arnie, and later Charles getting shot). In my mind, it should have been a fluid single sequence. I wonder if or how often "bastard" was uttered in this scene. Fare thee well, Christopher Reeve. I've said it before, but pop culture's gain was daytime's definite loss. Imagine seeing HIM day after day, year after year, decade after decade, conceivably until they stopped producing soaps in NYC.   Well, that answers my "bastard" question. Good lord, the roads of Rosehill are packed with high-strung drivers and/or pedestrians. More sequences that I hope played better than they sound.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think Ben had already left while under Marland and only returned briefly to reconcile with Eve. The whole thing confuses me as I thought for a long time that Eve left the show to go be with him and that was when they reconciled, but it seems like he returned, they got back together, then he left and maybe they were still together until she left to join him? I have no idea.  It does seem like the interim writers were using some characters like Justin and Helena who were quickly dumped under Kobe/Long, which is a shame. Helena is one of those characters who likely always had a shelf life but Rose Alaio was such a vibrant screen presence, if Kobe/Long had just been patient, she likely would have fit in well in the Reva era.
    • Also, the lawsuit story was not the right story to bring Naomi and Bill into a court battle since those types of lawsuits are usually resolved via settlements.
    • I know that Sara did eventually become Carrie's therapist, but I was curious if the show had her make comments regarding Carrie's stunts of making it seem as though Justin was cheating on Jackie.  Given that Justin cheated on Sara with both Jackie and Brandy, I wondered if it was wise of her to counsel Carrie given the conflict of interest involved. @DRW50I think once Adam/Sara end up married.. Marland didn't see any reason to explore Sara's personal life after the actor playing Adam was released.  I know that Sara lasts until at least Christmas 1982 on the show.. but I don't think she ended up staying on for very long into 1983. The period between Marland quitting and Pam Long starting was the perfect time to clean house on characters that had outgrown their usefulness  (i.e. Ben, Evie, Sara, Jennifer, Morgan).. and tying up stories started by Marland that were too complex (Mona Enright, Mark/Jennifer/Amanda triangle).
    • Unpopular opinion:  The focus on the soap opera tropes over the mysteries and crimes was partly what did the show in.  Also, featuring characters not involved in the legal, police, and criminal elements also hurt the show and took away what made it unique. Featuring characters like Jody, Raven, Sky, etc hurt the show long term.  The show ABCified starting in 1976/1977 and then went through a youthification period starting in 1981.  
    • I feel like the lawsuit storyline was resolved quickly because the show didn’t want to spring for more sets.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy