Members AbcNbc247 Posted August 10, 2020 Members Share Posted August 10, 2020 You’re right. That seemed to be the biggest flaw in ATWT’s final years. Storylines lasted only like a month and there was practically no buildup, no aftermath, no segue into another story, etc. Soaps aren’t supposed to be like that, for the most part. Look at when Bob and Kim got sick. Bob had a mass on his brain and needed surgery and Kim got so upset about it, she had a heart attack. They made the one joke about “his and her hospital rooms” and then the next time you saw them, they were both perfectly fine as though nothing had happened. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DramatistDreamer Posted August 10, 2020 Members Share Posted August 10, 2020 Exactly. I could mention at least one site that has those characteristics that you speak of, but I won't, lol. Please register in order to view this content The echo chambers and lack of critical analysis, out of fear that any critique would somehow land the show in cancellation was far more of a problem, imo. The exec-producers were never challenged to improve or adapt and the show stagnated itself into cancellation anyway. It's likely because the storylines weren't planned beyond a few weeks. One salient point that I have gleaned from these Locher Room livestreams with the actors is that Marland, in particular had storyline projections for at least a year or more. He had it physically mapped out, but wasn't rigid about being able to make adjustments as he saw things unfold. One thing that I learned early on is that the more specific you are in your outlines, the more freedom you have in your capability to adjust for the unforeseen because you've taken the time to build a stronger story foundation in which to lay everything out. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DRW50 Posted August 10, 2020 Members Share Posted August 10, 2020 When announcing MADD taking over the P&G soaps, I think it was Michael Logan who pointed out, aghast, that ATWT no longer had a long-term story plan. I have wondered if they ever did again. It sure didn't feel like it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DramatistDreamer Posted August 10, 2020 Members Share Posted August 10, 2020 Speaking as someone who writes and has tried to do without outlines, I can tell you that it is likely that ATWT dispensed with any degree of detail in story plans. If they did, it was likely a thumbnail sketch, compared to what Marland did. The stories in the wake of MADD and beyond had all the hallmarks of stories written without much of a plan, certainly not a well-thought out one. It showed so much. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Vee Posted August 10, 2020 Members Share Posted August 10, 2020 As early as MADD? That's nuts. Wasn't that the '90s? I know Frank Valentini was livid at OLTL when Dena Higley never had a long term bible, just a pitch line or two (Jessica has DID, etc). 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Soaplovers Posted August 10, 2020 Members Share Posted August 10, 2020 I remember back in 1998 when Lorraine Broderick was hired that she had a 6 month story projection that got her the job..but that once she was hired..all her ideas were rejected and she tried to make their edicts work as best as she could. Her stint was one of the last times Lisa had any sort of story, etc. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members BetterForgotten Posted August 10, 2020 Members Share Posted August 10, 2020 (edited) Yes, Eileen Fulton herself mentioned that P&G rejected most of Broderick’s ideas. Not sure how she was in the loop of all that though. Edited August 10, 2020 by BetterForgotten 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members EllenP Posted August 10, 2020 Members Share Posted August 10, 2020 I remember FMB or LB saying in 1999 that they would come up with long arcs for characters like Bob, Kim, and Lisa but could never get them approved after Kim’s heart story (even though that got them their highest ratings in years). How much of a lack of a long term plan resulted from HW ideas being rejected or cut short? HS had a long term story in place for Lily/Holden/Molly/Dusty and it was supposed to go for a year or so after Rose’s death, but then CBS pumped the brakes. Mid-2004 when HS really went off the rails in terms of planning. HS’s early stories also had clear trajectories with the ways he mapped out the disintegration of Hal and Barbara’s marriage and everything that spun off from it. I want to think that JP had a yearlong bible when she first began as solo HW in 2005. That yesr and into summer 2006 were quite good. By 2007, it was obvious that CG and/or the network had assumed near total control and budget issues could not be hidden. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DRW50 Posted August 10, 2020 Members Share Posted August 10, 2020 (edited) Yes. And this was his commenting on the situation upon her arrival so that would be 1996, the Black and Stern year. I never have understood why they even hired her if they didn't want to use her talents. I guess FMB and MADD loyalty. P&G and CBS were so incompetent and incoherent. The whole thing makes me mad all over again because ATWT should still be on the air today. Edited August 10, 2020 by DRW50 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members All My Shadows Posted August 10, 2020 Members Share Posted August 10, 2020 Yes! That crossed my mind. I shudder to even call it a "story" because it just wasn't. Everything was just a mini-story, and the result was that sometimes you got some really, really good single episodes (Bob and Kim's anniversary drama, for example), but never a really, really good full story. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members prefab1 Posted August 10, 2020 Members Share Posted August 10, 2020 Does anyone know why they decided to kill off Rose in the first place? If they needed to axe one of Martha Byrne's characters, then I think Lily would have been the more logical choice. They clearly struggled to write for Lily, and she came off as a mopey bore for most of her final decade on the show. Rose was a much more exciting, dynamic character, and it always looked like Martha had fun playing her. Also, can you just imagine the storyline possibilities if someone tried killing Rose but ended up killing Lily by mistake? You could get years of story just out of Lucinda not forgiving Rose for Lily's death. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Soaplovers Posted August 10, 2020 Members Share Posted August 10, 2020 But alas if you killed Lily off..where would that leave Holden? Holden could have gotten a new lease on life had that happened 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Vee Posted August 10, 2020 Members Share Posted August 10, 2020 (edited) I thought killing Rose was bold because she was so fun and vibrant. It rocked the show. Did I think all of the story at the time was very good - no. Some was, some sucked. The Paul/Rose wedding stuff was a ripoff of Todd and Blair's equally dumb "hell no" wedding at OLTL with Roger Howarth, who should never have replaced Scott Holroyd. But did the bold choice outweigh the losses with her gone - I don't know. Edited August 10, 2020 by Vee 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members AbcNbc247 Posted August 10, 2020 Members Share Posted August 10, 2020 IMO, that's the way it should be done. Marland was a genius. If I was a professional soap writer, I would do the same thing. Jean didn't do that, or Goutman (or P&G) didn't allow that and it ruined the show. Same could be said for AW and GL. I still find what P&G did unbelievable. Clearly they didn't want to be in the soap business anymore, but why they chose to wreck their shows to get them cancelled rather than just sell them, I will never understand 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DramatistDreamer Posted August 10, 2020 Members Share Posted August 10, 2020 Reminds me of the premise behind the musical The Producers. People think the idea of purposely setting out to destroy something is farce but P&G prove the concept it is very real. Lily's a "lifer". They were never going to kill off a character that has been on the show since 1984. I know most people tend to think of Martha as Lily but the character predates Byrne and obviously had as much longevity as Lucinda. The fact that three actresses have played the character speaks to the enduring quality of the character, at least in the minds of the production staff and execs, regardless of what any of us may think. Personally, I just didn't see Rose ever having that type of longevity, since imo, the character was written as overly-broad. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.