Jump to content

As The World Turns Discussion Thread


edgeofnik

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 17.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • DRW50

    2972

  • DramatistDreamer

    1958

  • Soapsuds

    1717

  • P.J.

    823

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Written properly, Gunnar could've been brought back virtually any time up to the show's cancellation, the possibilities were endless for any writer worth their salt, especially seeing that the character never 'died' onscreen.  Barbara had him declared legally dead (eventually) but I don't remember there being any solid evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I understand the plot value in getting rid of Gunner.  A part of the focus of the story was Ariel, so killing off Gunner moved her story forward.  Also, Gunner was never going to be Barbara's "end-game" or the love of her life, so she needed to be free.  Finally, being a rich orphaned teen made Dusty a perfect love object.

 

However,  Gunner and Burke played such similar roles in the story that they even died of similar diseases.  Gunner was around for just under three years, so it was probably the end of Hugo's initial contract.  So, I still wonder why were they both necessary to the plot as it was initially designed? And was it always the plan to kill them both?  Was there critical backlash to Hugo's performance? Did ratings go down during the romantic story?

 

It just seems like there were an unnecessary amount of Stenbeck heirs.

 

Upon reflection, it strains credulity that James would be so concerned about the heir.  He had already inherited his fortune legally, so no court could make him give it back.  Gunner and James were both already successful in their respective legal and criminal businesses, so they wouldn't need additional income.  Senior Stenbeck (who I always confuse with Brandon Spaulding) knew who was his legitimate heir when he wrote his will, and he could leave his money according to his wishes; regardless of legitimacy.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

With each subsequent writing regime, the Stenbeck heir origin stories became worse.  I think the very worst had to be Henry Colman's Stenbeck heir story.  Totally pointless, idiotic and annoying. 

It seems by that time, TIIC were determined to have Barbara's endgame story to be tied to a Stenbeck man, even if they had to invent yet another Stenbeck man.  By that time, Gunnar would've been the least illogical option, lol.

 

 

I watched a block of ATWT episodes from 1988 and Meg's hair...whewww!  Not only the hair but the outfits...Meg looks like she wandered off the set of The Golden Girls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Imdb has it listed from 1982-1985. But they also have him on AMC from 84-85. Then Capitol in 86, and GH in 88. I thought his WT run was only 2 years, actually. 

 

I disagree wholeheartedly about Gunnar/Barbara. In some ways, he definitely was the love of Barbara's life. Yes, Hal lasted longer, but I always thought it was the loss of Gunnar that broke her (yes, I know she technically flipped out over Brian...but he'd been the one helping her with Gunnar's death.)

 

Wills are always murky in soapville, but I always thought James craved the power of the name (initially) as much as the fortune. To hand it over to some photographer, was a such an insult as finding out he was born the son of a maid. 

Edited by P.J.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I saw that it was mentioned in another thread but I didn't catch it and just saw an article today. Philip Bosco passed away earlier this month. He was in many different works but I remember him best as Sam's "father," Elliot, who popped up in 1994 and 1995. I really loved that character, and Bosco worked so well with Brooke Alexander. He was one of the guest actors, like Jenny O'Hara and Claire Bloom, who kept me interested in ATWT when the writing by that point often did not. 

 

https://www.welovesoaps.net/2018/12/philip-bosco-dead-at-88.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Even though a large portion of the 1988 episodes that are up on You Tube, particularly during the strike, seemed to be bloated by endless flashbacks, there are some interesting BTS facts. The actor who played Barclay Lang, John Ottavino, his 1988 stint doesn't appear on IMDB but his 2007 appearance (as Dr. Sherwood?) does.  One would think that the more memorable storyline with Angel and Henry Lang would've been listed on his page but it isn't.

 

With the appearance of Lilith as well as Tom's discovery in Greece of Margo's pregnancy, the episodes become less redundant with filler and flashbacks, less Snyder-centric (somewhat) and more interesting on a consistent basis. Also by this time, the writer's strike has been over since August and these episodes are mid September.
Speaking of Lilith, so interesting to discover that Sara Botsford has been doing quite a bit of family-friendly fare these days.  She recently played Marilla Cuthbert in the most recent Anne of Green Gables T.V. movies (Fire & Dew, The Good Stars) that aired on Canadian television last year.  She's also appearing the Holly Hobbie television series (didn't know there was such a thing!).  As a fan of the Anne of Green Gable series, novels and original Canadian t.v. series in the late 80s/early 90s, I'm intrigued. 

Ironically, Botsford's character Lillith used to scare me as a child.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Yes today had some great stuff !!!! Yes and Colby and Trisha are proving to be quite the dynamic duo as well. 
    • Wow. Sometimes you say the perfect thing & at the best time! Take a bow. 
    • How much longer are Sharon and Tracy actually going to be around? I really hope we find out what Anita's secret is especially if they're going to be gone soon. I'm going to be really annoyed if we wait months on end to find out what it is. We still don't know what Martin's secret is even though it's been nearly 6 months. I can't help but think that maybe Anita might've had a hand in sabotaging or even destroying some people's reputations and careers, as Sharon had alluded to. Whatever her secret is, I don't think it's necessary murder, but it has to be really bad enough that Anita's terrified of it coming out and ruining her life. Maybe she got involved in some serious scandal that could've ruined her career but she somehow managed to keep it under wraps.  Also, are we ever going to get back to the corrupt partner storyline with Jacob or has that been officially dropped? I totally forgot about that until now. I won't be surprised if TPTB decided to drop it at some point. 
    • FROM THE VAULT: SATURDAY DAYTIME RATINGS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM FEBRUARY 1973  

      Please register in order to view this content

        FROM THE VAULT: SATURDAY DAYTIME RATINGS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM MAY 1973     FROM THE VAULT: SATURDAY DAYTIME RATINGS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM AUGUST 1973     FROM THE VAULT: SATURDAY DAYTIME RATINGS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM NOVEMBER 1973    
    • I seriously got chills over today's episode, and I haven't stopped thinking about it. Fancy face

      Please register in order to view this content

      The only humor I found was the ongoing snipping between Hope and Ciara.  After the heck that Hope put Julie through as an adolescent, it seems like justice has been served that there is rarely a moment of peace between this mother and daughter. I take back everything I thought about faux-John in the bed.  Marlena needed someone in the room today for that to work.  It would have been odd if she was alone in her bedroom, or he was dead in the bed next to her.  It is a powerful thing to say that her life didn't really begin until she found John.  We know she loved Don and Roman, but this was special and unique. I always wonder how writers choose a name for a character.  Here's Marlena: No wonder her sister Samantha went insane, she knew Marlena was the one her parents wished for. To distract from the story, I started wondering how often Hope and Marlena were on the show at the same time.? I know they shared stories, but it seems like Hope ascended during Marlena's absence, and Marlena re-appeared while Hope was not in Salem.  I also wondered how many more episodes Marlena appeared with John, than Don or Roman? Her on-screen marriage to Roman was relatively short.  But, there were a lot of breaks from the show during her marriage to John.  And she and Don were together for at least a few years.  
    • It's an equal mix of feeling tortured and superior being a day ahead. Ya'll are getting a pretty good one tomorrow. It puts some things into perspective.
    • I'm sure, with it being warmer in Atlanta, they'll utilise the Assembly grounds more (they've already shown cast on set being outside).
    • I never thought Days would be the soap that I look forward to each day and have it take me on an emotional roller coaster.   Proving that good writing will bring fans back.
    • You made some valid points about Dani. Her human side is what I am the most interested in learning about her. I wanna get to know Danielle...
    • I found an update of my favorite lil Phillip from '91-93! Played by twins Scott and Shaun Markley. Neither bio mentions their stint on YR 

      Please register in order to view this content

      https://cbulancers.com/sports/mens-volleyball/roster/scott-markley/457 https://nicholaslaw.org/shaun-markley/ Interestingly, AFAIK they were never listed in the cast credits. I guess it was always considered an under-5 role.  Courtland Mead was credited in '93, I guess he had more dialogue.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy