Jump to content

Is ABC Daytime About to Announce a Two-Year Pick Up For One Life to Live?!


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Jamey Giddens @ DC: In an article for the Denver Post, journalist Joanne Ostrow is reporting ABC is about to announce a two-year pick up for embattled soap opera One Life to Live.

Okay, this industry and her fans have some rough times in the last few years, but if this news proves true, I say it's reason enough for us to all go dancing, butt ass naked in the streets, singing "For Fronsie's a Jolly Good Fellow"!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 100
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Right.

Really, and I know some peoplve are gonna act a ass over this, but if ABC is announcing a "two-year pick up" for a show they own, then it sounds to me like they're giving it a two-year cancellation notice. Why else would they say "two years?" Why not one? Or three? Or four or five or six? Line it up with SOAPnet's demise in '12, and it makes sense to me.

And this is not to say that AMC won't get the same notice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What if One Life has signed some kind of production deal with other sources that lowers the cost even more ....much like the idea of AMC going to LA was to lower costs? Maybe it just means that a new production model will essentially 'buy' some time for another two years and then see what happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are a number of problems with the article this post is based on....

So ABC owns a show and is expected to renew it for another two years? If this were May, I'd believe it, but September? Not so much. Besides that is bunk considering ABC doesn't even do renewals for their soaps, since you know, they own it.

Yes, As The World Turns ended this month and joined Guiding Light in the soap opera graveyard. But, Oprah's show doesn't end until next September....you know, September 2011.

See again, ABC owns their shows and repeats them enough through out the year to make back expenses on some of the originals already broadcast through out said year. Oh, and did I mention ABC already owns their soaps?

On another note, I don't get the point of the article, but that is just me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There seems to have been a structured idea for the article, but nothing ever followed through. It was sentence followed by period. The follow-up sentences didn't even link well. The concept of the article makes sense, but the product published just didn't follow through on expectation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Community Posts

    • Matthew from NYC

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Yes, unfortunately, along with the neurofibromatosis storyline (which I liked), Pam became increasingly shrill and so did Victoria Principal. The writing was not stellar for the character of Pam and the acting followed suit, especially in Seasons 4 and early 5. Miraculously, halfway through Season 5, with that great twist of Pam assuming Christopher was for her, something just fell into place. Principal 'woke up', so to speak, and started to become better and better. With the significant improvement of writing for Pam in Season 6 came a calmer but stronger Pam. By Season 7, Principal was a solid draw, turning in consistently stellar, intriguing performances. She had relaxed. She was magnetic. Season 8 was a highlight. She carried Season 9. It's only when she was thrown back into the Ewing household that it somehow diminished but then she left. I haven't seen anything quite like it before. In my mind, it was a reaction to her material - either she didn't like it or did, and it showed.
    • While I agree the writing for Craig was atrocious, I think the bigger problem was casting Hunt Block in the role. Block was a one-trick pony, really incapable of conveying anything other than an all-consuming self-interest. Block was given plenty of material to use as emmy bait, and only netted one nomination at a period in time when ATWT was awash in them. He was good at portraying a smug belief in his innate superiority, but not the ability to care about anyone else. And it's not like Craig wasn't given those moments, Block either couldn't, or didn't chose to play them.  Meanwhile, Scott Bryce was able to give Craig a conscience in spite of even more atrocious writing.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy