Jump to content

HBO in ruin?


Sylph

Recommended Posts

  • Members

How many times do they repeat the same flicks? I think "The Incredible Hulk" might be on today. Right now. Followed by "V for Vendetta" and whatever new flick has premiered. They show no older flicks or no classic flicks. Just the same stuff for an expensive price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

You are all completely nuts. HBO has had Curb Your Enthusiasm, The Wire, Da Ali G Show, Real Time with Bill Maher... and they're doing a second season of Treme, which is completely worth it. Who gives a crap about the movies they air when they have Treme?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Hm, yeah, that's what it was until they became the premier channel for one-hour dramas. ;]

I'm not saying HBO is perfect, but I think the good consistently outweighs the bad. I'm saying a show like Treme completely overshadows the movies.

Remember when AMC was a real movie network? I was pissed when they added commercials and began censoring the non-classic movies they were suddenly airing. After a few years of mediocrity, I no longer care, because their original programming makes up for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But it's not like that's the reason most people subscribe these days. The name was coined 30 years ago and is basically irrelevant at this point. I imagine they keep it for the sake of brand recognition, but at this point, no one waits to watch movies on TV. OK, almost no one. People download them for free or watch on Netflix. I can't even remember the last time I bothered to watch a movie live on HBO.

At least when it comes to their original programming they have a certain level of control over when other outlets can deliver the product. Anyone who wants to be the first to see a "hot" show has to subscribe. But with the economy the way it is, how many people really feel the need to be the first to see the most recent TrueBlood? I know I wouldn't bother except my cable company offered me 12 months of Showtime/HBO for free when I went to cancel. Makes you wonder.

To the person who asked how much HBO costs, it varies widely. I think if there is no discount its about $12-$15 a month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's by itself. As Alphan says, HBO has a bunch of sub channels that are a part of the deal. Plus you get access to OnDemand. There are a bunch of deals out there to if you go looking. Like I said, BrightHouse gave me 12 months of free HBO/Showtime, just so I wouldn't cancel. Makes me think they are desperate to keep their subscriber numbers up. Last I knew Showtime was also offering a cashback deal to new subscribers. laugh.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I work for a cable company and Time Warner (who owns the network) is overpricing HBO, any recent contract renewals between local cable broadcasters and TW will have subscribers paying an arm and a leg for it not exactly worth it. Right now the company I work for price the package @ 14.95 and it isn't going to include on demand that's a separate subscription. Watch most company's do to encourage sales is they offer promotions for the ON DEMAND package (throw it into the deal) but for a short period of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Damn. I've been spoiled. I can't imagine paying for On Demand separately, since it's been included this whole time. When it's time for me to renew, I'm thinking I just won't. I agree one channel isn't worth $15.00. If it were the only way I could ever see their original shows, than yes, but since I can rent them eventually, I'll just wait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

When I think of it as $15 a month it doesn't seem that bad, but somehow when I think of it as $180 a year it seems outrageous. Kind of like a $4 latte doesn't seem that bad, but when I think of it as $80 a month or $960 a year, it's a lot easier to stay away from Starbucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Ah okay. Yeah, HBO is pretty pricey then. I could see why people would want to cut down on their subscription. Plus you can just download the shows or watch online. No need to pay for cable anymore, unless it's for sports.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I believe Cecile was intentionally used for comedic elements maybe twice. I mean, start with her being royalty from where? Tanquir!!! LOL From the first moment it's a gag, isn't it? And, her kidnapping Cass? I mean does a serious character do that? Well, literally, if you go another way & it's horror, sure. And, what you describe, a food fight, yeah, it's going to be played for laughs.
    • Y&R 1976 Pt 2 Bill is overjoyed when Jill arrives home with grandson. But Kay is furious and checks into legal action, only to find that there are no grounds (the check was returned). Brock Reynolds, Kay’s son from her first marriage, convinces her she can be the baby’s godmother and provide for him out of love.  But just as she’s starting arrangements to do this a legal petition arrives stating that Phillip Chancellor Foster is a rightful heir to and is now claiming his share of Phillip Chancellor’s estate. Jill has to do this, as the Foster family’s finances are now more precarious than ever. In fact, Liz, unable to get her factory job back, has secretly started working for Kay as her housekeeper. Jill explains to Kay that she has to do this for her baby’s sake but will drop the suit immediately if Kay puts it in writing that she will provide for them. Kay, however, retorts that Jill is the one who can’t be trusted—after all, she went back on her agreement to let Kay have the baby. Despite her attorney’s advice to work out an out-of-court agreement, Kay — insists on seeing this through. When Jill takes her little son to Phillip’s grave -on the Chancellor estate, Kay runs her off the property. In court, the geneticist testifies that Phillip could have been the baby’s father, but that Brock could have been, also. Jill then testifies that Phillip was the only man she was ever intimate with, and then only once; that Phillip decided on an immediate divorce from Kay and marriage to her, Jill, so that his baby could have his legal name. But Kay’s lawyer brings up the “dead-man statute,” which holds that conversations with a deceased person are not admissible as evidence because he can’t defend himself. When the  judge upholds this statute, Jill comes close to being held in contempt of court.  Brock takes the stand and substantiates Jill’s testimony that although he and Jill lived together for a time before her marriage to Phillip, they were never initimate. But the judge rules in favor of Kay; little Phillip’s claim is rejected. Jill emotionally tells the judge he has denied a child a decent life and a man  his dying wish.   Brad is told by Dr. Snapper Foster,his brother-in-law that his condition, nephritis of the optic nerve, is stable. The optic nerves are still swollen, but since his headaches have stopped he should continue his cortisone treatment. Brad is still firmly insistent that Leslie not be told.  From the moment they meet, Lance and Laurie charge the air around them with static. They find each other arrogant and egotistical, but when Lance needs a date for his trip to London, he calls Laurie, and she accepts. The pilot of Lance’s private plane cryptically suggests that Laurie turns his boss on because she seems turned off by him. This seems to hold true for Laurie, too. By the end of their London stay, Lance and Laurie have come to a better understanding of each other. Lance tries to tell her that, with talent of her own, she should not be jealous of Leslie. She tells him she has a book coming out, but it won’t be published under her own name. She explains further that she was an outgoing child and her parents didn’t understand that she needed as much attention as the introverted Leslie did. (Laurie has always felt she existed in Leslie’s shadow. Les is married to the man Laurie wanted, and is a successful concert artist, with the fame and recognition Laurie has tried so desperately to achieve. Laurie’s first book, a sexploitation novel, was a failure, and this new book is a novel based on Leslie’s nervous breakdown and recovery—something Leslie is trying to put behind her.) Gwen Sherman, now Sister Magdellen, will soon take her final vows, but still feels God holds her past against her, because nobody could possibly believe that a prostitute could be pure enough to become a nun. She finds her accidental meetings with Greg Foster (they were once in love) increasingly meaningful to her, and she begins to dream of Greg holding her in his arms. Finally, in torment and uncertainty, she tells the Reverend Mother she’s leaving the convent. But on the day of her release, Greg arrives with one of the convent orphans unconscious in his arms.The boy had fallen from a fence outside. When the  boy, Ramon, who had not spoken a word since his arrival, comes to, asking for Sister Magdellen, Gwen sees this as a sign from God and accepts her vocation. She will take her final vows and then enter nurses’ training.  Stay tuned...
    • I was just about to compose a post where I mention this period AW reminds me of JFP's  time on GL (1993-95) where it just reeked of cynicism and desperation. OR ATWT during Black and Stern. The common denominator is P&G. They allowed this stuff to go on.
    • I think the first 4-5 years have many strong spots, some beautiful writing, and I didn't find it that hard to watch, but one of the main issues with the show for me - and this just gets worse - is many of the characters we are told to root for I find extremely unlikeable. 
    • I don't see the people who were brought into AW around 1986 as being that different from JFP, but I don't feel like going back and forth either.
    • Agree to disagree. I think they cared. I think at times fans underestimate both the creative types & the execs. Certainly there can be specific times & specific people when ego & hubris are huge issues. But, basically, and most of the time the people involved very much want things to work. I'm not saying you don't have your Brian Frons or even your JFPs & your Susan D. Lees. We know at the end Chris Goutman had lost his way.
    • Pure bull, those scenes were.ere! The whole Liam story is going to end in disaster, just like Brad's other stories.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Joey and Vanessa's scenes are boring. Get Vanessa away from him. Anita and Eva scene was great too! Lots of good scenes in today's episode.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy