Jump to content

Dallas 2.0: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Gotta say I figured that this show would go downhill after Hagman but it's actually IMPROVED (in all due respect)with the JR's death storyline. No 90210 failure here.

Emma has become better as the slutty Lucy 2.0 character. Thankfully they switched gears from the snob she originally portrayed.

Hopefuly, VP is swerving everyone with the "not returning" stance. Even so, one way or the other I want to see this storyline bring the proper closure to Pam that we did not get with the original show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I guess I'll have to watch the last two episodes if some are saying it was good.

Ratings from last night:

2.603 total viewers and 0.8 in the 18-49 demo

I wonder how the ratings would be if they had premiered this season in the summer. The first season had episodes that ranged between 3 and 4 million.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Good that's it up to 0.8 again. I hope they premiere a new season late this summer.

Is it just me or is Emma giving off a Lucy vibe? Too bad they only used Afton for an episode, I really think she could be a good ally in Rebecca/Pamela's corner. It's awkward though how they decided to revert Rebecca's name to Pamela this season, especially considering the original Pamela storyline. It's obvious that the writers are having to refer her to as "Christopher's mom" because of this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They already established when Emma Bell was cast that her character was basically Lucy 2.0. She's not as interesting as Charlene was to me and I don't see chemistry with her and Kuno or Josh [it was predictable as hell when he slept with her and he had me cracking up when he was brushing her off at the hospital].

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think this show has become "boring" at all. It's just getting back that alltheEwings vs the world (and sometimes each other) vibe the early seasons of the original had before becoming too JR-centric in later seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, Emma is definitely the new Lucy, but far less interesting. There's potential there but I don't see any purpose for her other than sleeping around. I guess the same could have been said about Lucy but Charlene had a spark about her that ultimately made Lucy rootable and interesting to watch.

I mean, they even had Emma ripped away from Ann. Um, Lucy was pretty much ripped away from Val. So yeah, there was clear intentions, IMHO, for her to be the 'new Lucy'. I'm not entirely against it, if a) it was handled and written better and B.) if Lucy herself were actually being used

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy