Jump to content

Lovers and Friends/For Richer For Poorer Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Reading the entire thread once again...

I can't believe how many similarities L&F had with Generations. Both set in Chicago, with a formerly poor family moving in a big house, previously owned by rich people who lost their fortune. Ellie Saxton is similar to Ruth Marshall, both poor daughters who want to be accepted by the high society.

L&F reads a lot like the movie Interiors (like Carl said some ten years ago). Adult, sophisticated drama. And all these workplace stories sound fascinating. And what an amazing music theme the show had. I guess casting was its biggest problem, charismatic actors might have made up for the slow start. The idea behind FRFP was insane from the start. It would have never worked. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • Replies 217
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • 1 month later...
  • Members

Jon Michael Reed Sept 24 1978

It's all over except for the ending for NBC's "For Richer, For Poorer." The youngest network serial will be canceled at month. The show premiered in January of 1977 under the title "Lovers and Friends." After six months it took a leave of absence from the airwaves for a period of story and actor realignment. The show reappeared last December under its new title, new writers and a few actor replacements.

Still, "FR, FP" never managed to grind up much audience enthusiasm and support, despite visually stunning sets, costumes and production values. The story, too, although increasingly intriguing in recent months, failed to garner a sufficient audience to make it a going proposition.

In the wake of "FR, FP's" demise are the aborted serial careers of several promising performers. In addition to such serial veterans as Patricia Barry (Viola) and Stephen Joyce (George), who were shamefully wasted in terms of story material, "FR, FP" boasted a fine cast of attractive serial neophytes, especially Christine Jones (Amy), Richard Backus (Ja- son), Rod Arrants (Austin), Cynthia Bostick (Connie), Julia MacKenzie (Lauriel), and Darlene Parks (Megan). The show also spotlighted a young actor from a racial minority group, Chu Chu Malave who matured in acting skill as Paco. Hopefully, some smart serial producer will pick up the talents of "FR, FP's" cast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

"For Richer, For Poorer" seemed to gain a little life later in the run, but who knows how things would have panned out in the long run. I don't have much interest in mob tied Lee Ferguson chasing after blonde heroine Tessa Saxton while father Les huffs and puffs about their involvement. If they were going to be written out, that would have been preferable. Though, I think the idea of posh Edith Cushing's goddaughter Wendy Prescott hooking up with reformed street hood Paco Morales was much more intriguing. Futhermore, the battle for Cushing & Sons seemed to gain some momentum when Austin returned to the firm at his mother's request, to his wife Amy's concern, to go against Jason for the presidency. Jason and Megan's marriage was destined for failure and what a wonderful trainwreck that would hav eben to see play out. 

I know the show was intending to kill off Dr. Roy White in November, 1978, had the show continued. I would speculate that Connie or Bill would have been accused, but they would have pinned it on Roy's lover Nancy Snyder's Colleen Griffith or tied Roy to the mob. I also have to wonder if the show was going to pair Dr. Chris Gifford, Amy's doctor brother introduced in the final weeks, with Connie once things settled in Connie's universe. 

Lemay's version was still stronger, but King's version had some interesting elements. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...
  • Members

Lovers & Friends aired on NBC from Jan. 3, 1977 to May 6, 1977. It was taken off the air at that point & re-tooled & renamed & began again as For Richer, For Poorer. For Richer, For Poorer aired on NBC from Dec. 6, 1977 to Sept. 29, 1978. 1977-78 where ATWT & AW were tied for 1st ranking both with 8.6 and EON was 13th out of 14 with 5.2, Lovers & Friends was 14th, dead last, with 3.9 so substantially lower than low. Lovers & Friends debut had been 15th out of 15 with only a 2.1. And, in 1978 when For Richer, For Poorer was canceled it was 14th out of 14 with that 2.1 again and above it EON & LOL were tied for 12th place with 5.8, so again much higher than this NBC show. It's impossible to talk about For Richer, For Poorer without first talking about Lovers & Friends which aired on NBC from Jan. 3, 1077 to May 6, 1977. After having great success at Another World Pete Lemay (writer) and Paul Rauch (producer) collaborated on creating a brand new serial about two families.

The wealthy Cushings - Austin, an unemployed college dropout who has a problem with the bottle. His sister Megan. Their father Richard a stockbroker. Edith their mother who is a socialite.

The other family is the upwardly mobile Saxtons. Rhett Saxton fell in love with Megan Cushing. His parents, Lester & Josie. His brother Jason who also had a crush on Megan. A younger brother named Bentley & 2 sisters, Eleanor who was a social climber & was married to George Kimball & the baby of the family, Tessa.

Concentrating on Class conflict & psychological themes it was set in a suburb of Chicago, fashionable Point Clair. This soap was similar to Another World in that it relied on character development more than on plot. But Lovers & Friends had a more youthful cast than AW. After 4 months it was decided to pull it & re-tool it.

After a hiatus of 7 months the show returned to NBC daytime renamed For Richer, For Poorer & this iteration was broadcast from Dec. 6, 1977 to Sept. 29, 1978. Changes: Still located in the same Chicago suburb but no longer neighbors. Tom King is now the Head writer with Lemay acting as a consultant. Edith Cushing was recast & made a widow. Austin Cushing is married to Amy Gifford. Two of the younger Saxtons, Bentley & Tessa are now in college. The star-crossed lovers, our leads, Megan & Bill (Rhett was dropped as a name.) were recast. It began the day of Megan & Bill's wedding with his ex telling the bride she's pregnant with the groom's baby. A 3rd wealthy family was added. Mac & Rachel from AW were on several days. Some of the cast was the same but it was larger so there were new faces.

Please register in order to view this content

Edited by Donna L. Bridges
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • OH, I AM.   And it looks like it's a pretty good episode so I might watch later on this weekend after work cuz I see a lot of scenes with people I actually like. Very happy to see Rocco/Danny appear to be getting story, too. 
    • I do agree that a revival of EON would work, if it doesn't fall into doing all of the typical soap opera tropes... which it became guilty of in the final few years of the show with the over abundance of Raven/Sky at the expense of the actual detectives, police, etc. And I know it was mentioned earlier that Raven had lost any true connections on the show with the death of her on screen mother, and the loss of April/Draper/Deborah.. and I do agree with that. I actually thought the show would have done something with the Shelley character that could have connected her to the Raven character.  There were a few scenes where the two would have scenes and size one another up before they would go their separate ways.. so I assumed perhaps they would have been revealed as half-siblings and/or perhaps cousins.  Alas.. not to be.
    • It definitely flowed beautifully. So much that I was annoyed when Vanessa/Doug because I wanted to get back to the party. I know it was intentional to build up tension and suspense. It worked. lol. I'm glad it was there in hingsight because it gave us that great conversation between Doug and Vanessa. Foreshadowing? And yesss!!! This episode was sooo old school soap giving beat after beat after beat leading up to the unveiling of Eva as Ted's daughter. And we still have plenty of fallout/aftereffects to work through.   Speaking of...Bill, Bill, Bill lol. Good to have confirmation HE was the scary lawyer.   I'm sure I will have a busy Monday, but I can't wait for it. I don't know what I'm looking forward to more. Probably Anita vs Silk Press Sheila tbh. And yes, I feel they will be matching each other 'blow for blow.' 
    • And if they go there, it could also be tied to Johnny completely cutting him off, possibly going to work for Titan, etc.
    • @AbcNbc247 maybe it is just that they've gone to that well too often, and I don't like when DAYS goes dark, but I'm OK with EJ abusing drugs, and just skipping the whole sobriety part. Side note: experiencing hallucinations of my son killing me would be enough for me to never want to take a pill again.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Part of the reason that Courtney worked at OLTL was because the show had an actual character for her to play.  One that was somewhat different than her character on AW, and after the way she was treated over at AW.. it had to have been nice to be courted onto a new soap that actually valued your contributions.  
    • I figured the "long" was already implied 
    • You'll be very impressed 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • And then next week it will out of sync again.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy