Jump to content

Disney's Tangled


EricMontreal22

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I mean 3D. As opposed to 2D, classic Disney of Aladdin, Mermaid etc. 3D like this one creates an illusion that the characters are in #D while 2D doesn't. Different than Avatar's 3D, for which you need special glasses etc., but still 3D.

Mulan's Huns scene is computer generated but isn't 3D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

OK, I think I get you, though I think CGI (like this) always has that illusion? I'm not a CGI fan actually, as much as I like animation, but I appreciate the different (to my eyes) look they've gone here.

Even if I don't think it looks as gorgeous as I hoped when I read this was the inspiration:

Fragonard-The%20Swing.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've heard that trailer is marketing the movie to the mainstream crowd, hoping to pull in guys who wouldn't go see a movie about a princess named Rapunzel. In reality this is something different.

We shall see...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, I think with a new Disney princess to add to their line, they aren't worried about the girl audience but are about the boy (apparently this is a reason it's not called Rapunzel or Rapunzel Unbraided as rumoured at one point). It is true that the "boy" based ones--Aladdin, Lion King, tend to do better even than movies like Mermaid or Beauty and the Beast. I've read elsewhere that apparently it's far less comedic, action packed and Shrek like than that ad makes it seem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Community Posts

    • That set was awful. I hated the architecture of the house too. The characters were a bust with the writers not knowing what to do with them. In season one there are several episodes where they are not even shown or they are given few lines. I guess they are the Chris & Tracy Partridge of Knots Landing....

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Thanks for all the info. I did not know about some of that. That explains when Sue Ellen did her movie, she did not include Pam. I figured she would have the them do the scene of when J.R. caused her to fall that caused the miscarriage or show the flashback of it. Victoria was right to leave if they were not willing to pay her the same rate as Duffy. She got screwed because of Duffy leaving and then he gets paid the big bucks to return. I have come to dislike the Bobby character somewhat. Duffy seemed to get more smarmy/hammy as the show progressed, especially after his return. I always hated how Bobby threw Pam under the bus where Jenna was concerned. Even in the first year, Bobby would drop everything for Jenna and then acted like Pam was being ridiculous when she was a bit jealous. They resolved Charly was not Bobby's in that episode, but then when Jenna returned, they started that crap all over again. I might have cared if Fairchild had returned to the role and it was better written, but Presley did not impress me enough to care about Jenna.  I also thought it was a mistake to kill off Kristin so fast. She could have driven story for years. Since they did kill her off, they should have had baby Christopher to really be J.R.'s and have Bobby and Pam keep the secret for years. Maybe have little Christopher start to exhibit devious tendencies as he started to grow up. 
    • I’m not watching but people are saying the Muchova/Sabalenka match is great.
    • I think we're nearer the tipping point where SCOTUS will have to finally be overhauled, tbh. It will take time but it's rattled the general public.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy