Jump to content

Bravo's The Real Housewives of....


Cheap21

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 40.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Cheap21

    4961

  • Taoboi

    4020

  • Cat

    4011

  • NothinButAttitude

    3972

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Re: Cheap on RHOBH.

While I do see that there is a gang up on Lisa mentality on RHOBH, it doesn't make me feel like Lisa is a light. I feel like Lisa holds a grudge like no other in the cast and it's hard to penetrate. She wears her s--t way better than Nene but it's still s--t. It feels like you're getting nowhere and never will. I loathed Kyle for a few seasons but what I enjoyed about her this past season is she showed an ability to move on. Kyle will always have an issue with Lisa - they're both very alpha. I don't dislike any of the women on RHOBH but the main storylines are s--t: everyone has a problem with Lisa leading to indignant Lisa, Brandi puts her foot in her mouth and somebody whines about it for at least half the season. If they could somehow shift the storylines. For that, I could live without Lisa AND BRANDI in the cast. I'd like them both to be in the cast but I have no interest in the storylines and their storylines dominate. The series feels to me like NJ felt to me the season before last.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I loved Kathy too - I'm on her side! :)

I really enjoyed Ladies of London. I love the dynamic of mixing the Americans with the Brits... and Americans having a very hard time being accepted by British elite. I've been to London so many times and I just adore that city, so this show is really close to my heart. British tabloids and the press are soooo shady and fierce when it comes to their reporting - it's amazing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I loved the LOL premiere. I dozed off due to being tired from work and missed the last few minutes. Tried to watch it twice and dozed off again. LOL!!! But I loved how it was set up and being able to get into it more on a 2nd viewing. And the fact that WOW!!!! This women are some rich bitches. And their backgrounds I found so fascinating...especially, Annabelle aka the Juliet Landau lookalike. She has already been set up as a tragic figure and the fact that the persona that she has and everyone around her appear to go with as well is that she is a 'don't f*uck with me' woman.

I suspected I would like her.

But LOVE her. So sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

NYC was awesome tonight. Trash and George are both unappealing to me but when George said he was going to lick his hand and put it on Ramona's vagina at her funeral I was disturbed. This man is sick and Aviva's psycho ass never takes him to task for it. Poor Cody I hope she doesnt really have this man's babies after he dies. No need in having those genes carry on anymore than they already have.

Grandpa Creep was also reaching accusing Trash of being a full out racist. Ignorant and impulsive? Sure and that behavior from her doesnt discriminate against any race.

The Drunk is a mess. I did feel bad for her since she's broke and the other ladies won so much money.

LuAnn is continuing to be entertaining and I loved how Heather refused to coddle the Drunk.

Edited by Eric83
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Yes!

Honestly I feel a very similar way. When people only watch for one wife it's reflective much more on a bad story, not really the wives. BH has always had a problem of being false. They have all these issues they don't really discuss, a lot of the story is off screen, and what made me like Brandi was she brought it all up.

BH needs better stories. ATL two seasons ago was truly awful and boring and came back with the exact sane cast and was interesting and a great season. BH could do it, but these ladies need to actually have a story. People whine when reality shows create conflict and story, but it's needed.

And so much yes on that nene/Lisa comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Or Megan is shot by mobsters as retaliation for Dave's unpaid gambling debts.
    • Finland seemed such an odd choice for a location shoot. ATWT went to Greece and later Spain while GL had Tenerife and there were others in that timeframe. But Finland not being a known tourist destination or offering the tropical/sunny atmosphere usually associated with location shoots seems off brand. Maybe they were negotiating a deal with a tourist association and it fell through.
    • I was talking about 1986, but the glimpses of 1982 are about the same. 
    • I skimmed some of the 1982 synopses; Steve was planning on an opening an office in Finland, and I think Jim went there as part of the preparation. That probably was a big issue; AW had already gone to San Diego that year, with Rachel/Steve/Mitch. And to upstate NY with Pete and Diana. I wonder if upstate was as expensive lol  AW in 1982 has always fascinated me, because of how messy it was 
    • That makes sense. What a messy time for the show. And any changes they made were mostly for the worse.
    • The transition from Neal to Adam was very abrupt, and to be honest my theory is that the character of Neal was designed so that we think he is super shady but then it turns out that he was on the side of good all along so Neal could have seamlessly become a hero of the BCPD with no need for Adam. I don't know whether Robert Lupone was hired on a short contract or if he was fired from a longer-term contract because they decided they wanted someone who was more of a leading man type, but I can imagine a scenario where Charles Grant did both the undercover Egyptian treasure/flirt with Victoria and the straighter-arrow day to day police investigation. But in my imagined scenario the MJ prostitution plotline probably doesn't exist and instead he probably continues a relationship with Victoria. The story seems very odd to me. I assume that David Canary would have been included only because a plotline where Steve is going to Finland in which only Rachel is seen in actual Finland seems unlikely. The synopses explicitly mention that Alice can't go with Steve but would whoever was playing Alice at that time have had the kind of clout to get the remote cancelled? It also strikes me as unlikely that production would have approved the expensive location shoot and *then* cancelled it only because of jealousy. It seems more likely that they rejected it because of the expense but then the jealousy part got added to the gossip speculatively, possibly because while it was being worked out they justified not including more castmembers because of the expense. 
    • My comment has nothing to do with cast resentment, but does relate to the Finland location shoot: It may be a coincidence, but Jim Matthews died in Finland in 1982.  Hugh Marlowe's final episode was in April 1982, but the character probably didn't die untll May or June. (I'm unable to find the character's date of death, only the date of Marlowe's final episode). SInce Jim and Rachel had very little interaction after around 1975, it is unlikely Jim's death in Finland had any connection to Rachel's potential visit, but the choice to have Jim die in that location at that time is a head-scratcher.  I'm sure the writers sent Jim on an extended trip (and off-screen) because of Marlowe's illness.  But Finland seems like a strange choice considering the (then) recently cancelled location shoot.  
    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
    • Brooke did ads before ATWT too. That probably helped get her the job. After ATWT she seemed to branch more into hosting, along with ads.  I think I saw Kelley in an ad or two, but you're right she wasn't on as much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy