Jump to content

Bravo's The Real Housewives of....


Cheap21

Recommended Posts

  • Members

:(

Makes her reaction to Kristen all the more understandable for me personally. Who has time to deal with idiotic children who can't understand basic English? If I'm already on edge cuz my marriage may be falling apart and I ask you to not do something and then you do it.... Don't be surprised and act the victim when I react!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 40.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Cheap21

    4961

  • Taoboi

    4020

  • Cat

    4011

  • NothinButAttitude

    3972

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Ramona supposedly going to spy on Mario doesn't change the fact that she attacked someone then made up a long story about her childhood abuse for sympathy and to leave AFTER hiring a plane to come get her. Not to mention it was clear she was going to that party along as she sponsored it and that's the reason she was pressed about getting her hair wet... While in a lake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You really love exaggerating don't you? First Ken "attacked" Yolanda. Then Ramona has somehow attacked Kristen? She threw a glass at the girl.....a plastic one at that. Hardly bodily assault. Its NOT an attack. Ramona didn't even lay a finger on the girl.

Porsha attacked Kenya....that's an attack...textbook definition.

She didn't make up a story about her childhood....she may have used it to get out of the trip but again with this new revelation I'm honestly don't care. She clearly looked uncomfortable the entire time they were at the Berkshires (sorry if the spelling is incorrect). And Mario's dumb reaction when Heather revealed the getaway she had planned to "steal" their wives is so obvious now....the guy was looking forward to be alone and cheating on his wife. How terrible.

You can try to paint Ken and Ramona and etc how you like but you can't just make up facts like some birther or a Tea Party Republican who denies climate change....its just illogical. Again no one is denying Ramona did something wrong. But her reaction was justified and it wasn't the biggest crime of the century....and this news about her catching Mario and having all this emotional stress during this period makes it more than obvious how dumb Kristen's decision was. Especially after she was told to NOT throw something at Ramona...

Edited by ThePrinceOfSunspear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Right. Ramona is trying to make it seem like it was some red color cup she tossed. That [!@#$%^&*] if plastic was that hard plastic fancy [!@#$%^&*]. Regardless it busted her lip. Yes that's an attack. If I throw something at your face and make you bleed I've attacked you. It's not hard to understand.

The excuses people will make for this trashpot are amazing.

But yes big bad evil Kristen. She had the audacity to splash someone while in a lake. It's too bad Ramona didn't hurt her further, after all she deserved it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know girls that will bust a bitch if you mess with their hair. I didnt like how her feelings about it were being diminished. "Oh its just hair". Well it is, but its hers and it obviously means something to her. Kristen was told not to wet her hair and she went after it anyway, despite what went down the previous week. Why is it okay for her to rock the canoe and splash Ramona repeatedly, despite being told to stop and get away from her? The cup was the only thing that literally stopped Kristen dead in her tracks. There is no denying that Ramona was wrong to throw the cup (she was), but why does Kristen get a free pass for initiating the altercation and going out of her way to antagonize and provoke Ramona?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In my mind it isn't. Exaggerations and lies from people similar to jp are why the criminal justice system in America is such an absolute joke. A gay black man could walk past a middle aged white woman (lets say Yolanda for example) and just glance at her and certain people would scream that the black guy visually raped her or assaulted her. Its absolutely ridiculous.

Like Cheap said you and payton are simply minimizing Ramona's feelings and her POV. She didn't ask for Kristen to throw water on her person or hair. She even warned her. I don't know what else to say except that's Ramona's wishes were well know. Her emotional state at the time has just been revealed. All that taken into considerationI think her reaction isn't a big deal. On a strictly legal manner when you throw words like "assault" or "attack" I highly doubt they would stick.

Ramona didn't lay a finger on her. She didn't even grab her hair like Porsha did Kenya. In the end tho it doesn't matter. Kristen might not even be on RHONY this time next year and in the grand scheme of things this whole argument is pointless. Ramona will remain the fabulous, strong, independent, no nonsense lady that she is and the haters will stay hating....its the natural order of things!!!

RE RHONJ is it two new housewives or is it 3? Melissa was surprisingly quiet in that trailer. And Joe Gorga stays a nasty man...

Edited by ThePrinceOfSunspear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I skimmed some of the 1982 synopses; Steve was planning on an opening an office in Finland, and I think Jim went there as part of the preparation. That probably was a big issue; AW had already gone to San Diego that year, with Rachel/Steve/Mitch. And to upstate NY with Pete and Diana. I wonder if upstate was as expensive lol  AW in 1982 has always fascinated me, because of how messy it was 
    • That makes sense. What a messy time for the show. And any changes they made were mostly for the worse.
    • The transition from Neal to Adam was very abrupt, and to be honest my theory is that the character of Neal was designed so that we think he is super shady but then it turns out that he was on the side of good all along so Neal could have seamlessly become a hero of the BCPD with no need for Adam. I don't know whether Robert Lupone was hired on a short contract or if he was fired from a longer-term contract because they decided they wanted someone who was more of a leading man type, but I can imagine a scenario where Charles Grant did both the undercover Egyptian treasure/flirt with Victoria and the straighter-arrow day to day police investigation. But in my imagined scenario the MJ prostitution plotline probably doesn't exist and instead he probably continues a relationship with Victoria. The story seems very odd to me. I assume that David Canary would have been included only because a plotline where Steve is going to Finland in which only Rachel is seen in actual Finland seems unlikely. The synopses explicitly mention that Alice can't go with Steve but would whoever was playing Alice at that time have had the kind of clout to get the remote cancelled? It also strikes me as unlikely that production would have approved the expensive location shoot and *then* cancelled it only because of jealousy. It seems more likely that they rejected it because of the expense but then the jealousy part got added to the gossip speculatively, possibly because while it was being worked out they justified not including more castmembers because of the expense. 
    • My comment has nothing to do with cast resentment, but does relate to the Finland location shoot: It may be a coincidence, but Jim Matthews died in Finland in 1982.  Hugh Marlowe's final episode was in April 1982, but the character probably didn't die untll May or June. (I'm unable to find the character's date of death, only the date of Marlowe's final episode). SInce Jim and Rachel had very little interaction after around 1975, it is unlikely Jim's death in Finland had any connection to Rachel's potential visit, but the choice to have Jim die in that location at that time is a head-scratcher.  I'm sure the writers sent Jim on an extended trip (and off-screen) because of Marlowe's illness.  But Finland seems like a strange choice considering the (then) recently cancelled location shoot.  
    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
    • Brooke did ads before ATWT too. That probably helped get her the job. After ATWT she seemed to branch more into hosting, along with ads.  I think I saw Kelley in an ad or two, but you're right she wasn't on as much. 
    •   Thanks for sharing these. I wonder if Charles might have been in the running for Adam. I know Preacher was a bit of a bad boy at times on EON, but Neal seemed to be a step down, and Robert Lupone had played a similar part on AMC. Given the huge cast turnover at this point I wonder who thought they had been there long enough to go.  Laura Malone/Chris Rich would get a remote within the next year. 
    • Interesting.  It seems to allude to that statement that Warren Burton made around that time about some AW actors getting special treatment.  I wonder who was resentful about not getting to go. 
    • Good morning, boys!  I figured that it was time that our Gio was introduced into the hotness thread

      Please register in order to view this content

      @ranger1rg I even included a close up of his face for ya!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy