Jump to content

AMC: Wednesday: 3.3.2010


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I had forgotten some of that hair. That next to last picture looks like Opal :o

I actually liked the short hair she had when she married Tad in 1994. I think it suited her, it was short, but not too severe, or an ugly color, like what she had in 95-96.

cheap21 I love that you said "Her hair only looked good in the 80s." Wasn't she only on the show in the 80s for like one year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

If the worst thing we can say about an episode is that Cady's hair looked whacked (how many countless other AMC episodes have people said THAT about?), I think we have a pretty good show going. ;)

Maybe Cady's hair was the second worst thing. They were using the steady cams in these scenes, but the camera operators SO could NOT keep the cameras steady - which is so much more dizzying to watch in HD! JHC, please don't put your viewers through this. It doesn't add drama or tension, it adds nausea.

By the way, I don't think anyone's being hysterical when discussing a production issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Haha oh boy --- that is a bad 'do for Cady. I remember reading Cady's blog years ago and she mentioned that she felt empowered to be able to change her hairstyle whenever she wanted - and that with each new chapter in her personal life, there comes a new hairdo. It gives her strength (or some BS like that).

Anyway - glad she's back - Dixie is my girl! Can't wait to watch later tonight.

Btw, I thought some of her best hair styles were from her last few stints on AMC (first ghost scene waving to Kathy; ghost scene during Angie/Jesse's wedding; even during the 98-99 era when she came back after the Holidays explosion).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was just going to mention her blog, that you just know she'll take to it when she hears all this scuttle about her hair... how we're totally missing the point and losing sight of a story that's actually powerful and touching in this current climate of daytime over something so trivial as hair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Exactly! When the episode itself is as great as it was today, the only thing to complain about is the hair and that damn shaky cam.

As for what happened, I loved Annie's reaction to Brooke actually helping JR by making a website when Annie can really save him and just couldn't figure out why she should. Asking Angie point blank really showed just how lost she still is. The Liza/Tad scenes were really good even if they did just highlight the upcoming triangle with Krystal and the camera couldn't stay still. I also really enjoyed the Damon/Opal, Annie/JR, Ryan/Greenlee (don't shoot me, I'm finding them watchable together these days)and Ryan/David scenes.

And imo she would be justified considering how fantastic the show has been lately. I'm not saying we can't comment on her hair at all, but that seemed to have become the focal point of this thread. As the pictures posted above demonstrate, it's not like Cady ever made good hair choices in the past anyway!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That sounds like an invitation! :)

I accept.

Brooke's return is boring. She's doing exactly what she was doing before she vaporized in the cemetery three years ago. Hand holding while everyone else has the drama. Oh, wait! She made a bone marrow website! Never mind!

Adam's invisible love child he allowed to keep hidden for decades is out of character and insulting.

There are only two main stories going on right now and they're moving at a snail's pace... and that's sad since we've just come off of an equally paced sweeps.

The Tad and Liza history lesson was heavy handed and rang extremely false with Turbo.

Damon's not interesting.

Frankie, the aspiring surgeon recovering from war injuries to his hands, continuously bashing his hand against large, inanimate objects is ridiculous! Why not do a story about a make up model who continuously rams her face into a door every time she gets frustrated?

Yes... there's more than just Cady's hideous hair that's left to be desired. Yes, I understand that it's the train of thought around these parts to praise all the "good" and ignore the glaringly negative aspects of the "storytelling" during this transition because, somehow, some way, it's supposed to make the soap gods see that Lorraine Broderick is a miracle worker and hopefully get her to, not only stay on the writing team, but also somehow manage to get a choke hold and on Swajeski and Kreizman and "keep them in check." I understand that. But it will take a lot more than "mentions of history" to get me on board this train. I would like to see actual STORIES being told... However, we won't get to see that because the new head writers are already in place, and over the next few weeks, things will be leading up to tell their tales. Not Lorraine's... even though she's not the head writer, anyway.

Well, since you're indirectly referring to a comment I made to someone else, I'll directly say to you that those were hand held cameras, not stedicams. Also, that was clearly a director's choice in blocking and taping the scenes in that specific location -- the hospital corridor -- because there were no use of hand held cameras in any other location... on the hospital set or any of the other scenes... which is why I said calm down to that particular poster, because there's no need to worry that steadicam and/or hand held cameras are taking over the show in another "experiment." No one said anybody was hysterical. From a technical standpoint, you can get a camera operator and a hand held in spots better than you can fit an operator and a pedestal camera. That's all. :)

And that hair is GROSS!

Just had to reiterate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This one will always be my favorite because Erica once referred to how Dixie was guarding David's office as it being like she was "a poodle on steroids". :lol: Every time I saw her with that hair after that, I realized how true it was and couldn;t keep from cracking up. LMAO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, at least I know you'll respond to me on here, though not on a PM - you know, like the PM where I politely, apologetically asked you why you were suddenly making snide comments toward my posts (wondering if I actually did something to offend you and hadn't realized it)? To which you ignored. You had no problem responding here...

I'm going to take a wild guess that my enjoying the show (maybe anyone enjoying the show, but for some reason, specifically me) is irritating you. Hindsight, your comments didn't start until I was openly enjoying AMC again - so it makes sense. Prior to that, I never had any negative interaction with you. In any case... Just because you may not agree with something, or even if you don't enjoy something others do, doesn't mean people are stupid or blind or that they lamely pray to "soap gods."

I'm sorry if my praise for a show or a writer doesn't gel with you. I can't change my opinion; I like what I like. But you shouldn't condescend to me or anyone over it, especially openly like that. Your comments about soap gods and miracle workers make people who disagree with you sound naive or starry-eyed. I wouldn't assume those people are, and I can assure that with me, that's definitely not the case.

If it were really about just me, personally, I wouldn't respond here. But what you're saying sort of rolls in a number of people here, visitors and posters alike, who may share feelings about the show that are similar to my own. I think the subject deserved an open defense.

I was. I was pre-emptively saying it because I, myself, had just commented on the same issue. You told someone to "calm down" because they commented on the camera work. Who would want to be characterized as the opposite of calm? I figured I'd batten down the hatch ahead of time.

Steadicams are actually the rolling mount, so you're right, I mis-used the terminology of "steadicam"... Sorry for that. What I was trying to say (along with others) was that the hand-held use of the camera was bothersome visually. I don't know if it shows up as intensely on other TV's, but on a 50-inch or 42-inch wide-screen, it's not a good thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Surely we (and Billy Flynn) are not going to be saddled with a character named Aristotle Dumas? This isn't 1970's Edge of Night.
    • What annoys me a little bit about the "day players" is they sound a bit too "Brooklyn-ish" sometimes.  Obviously, the show was taped in New York City, and the actors are all New York actors, but Monticello is supposed to be located in Illinois or Ohio.  Occasionally, they grab actors and actresses for small roles who have VERY distinct New York accents, which contrasts sharply with the main cast, none of whom have noticeable accents (except for our dashing European gigolo, Eliot Dorn, of course).  The heavy Brooklyn accent works fine if the character is a bookie, or the owner of a pawn shop, or a guy who's selling stolen guns on the street corner.  But when it's a steadily recurring character -- such as the first Mrs. Goodman, who worked for Miles and Nicole -- it's pretty jarring to me sometimes.  And you'll see it often -- such as an "under-five" character who witnesses a car accident, or a character who witnesses a shooting, or the occasional desk clerk, or waiter.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I'm screaming at those clips and gifs.  THIS IS PURE GOLD.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's always been my thought. I can't imagine that the show would play up the unseen AD so far in advance without them casting a *star*. After today's episode, I wonder if he'll somehow be connected with Diane. It was strange that Diane mentioned her very distant family today. I can't recall Diane ever talking about her backstory. Maybe he's her much younger brother?  It's also possible he's connected to Diane during her time in LA. Sally's already said she crossed paths with him. OC, I think Dumas is Mariah's mistake.... As a side note, it was good to see some mixing it up - Adam with Clare/Kyle and Sharon with Tessa.
    • Here's the place to share some memorable criticism. You don't have to agree with it, of course (that's often where the fun starts). Like I mentioned to @DRW50, Sally Field was a favorite punching bag in the late '80s and early '90s.   Punchline (the 1988 movie where she and Tom Hanks are stand ups): "It's impossible to tell the difference between Miss Field's routines that are supposed to be awful, and the awful ones that are supposed to be funny." -- Vincent Canby, New York Times. "It's not merely that Field is miscast; she's miscast in a role that leaves no other resource available to her except her lovability. And (David) Seltzer's script forces her to peddle it shamelessly." -- Hal Hinson, Washington Post. "As a woman who can't tell a joke, Sally Field is certainly convincing. ... Field has become an unendurable performer ... She seems to be begging the audience not to punch her. Which, of course, is the worst kind of bullying from an actor. ... She's certainly nothing like the great housewife-comedian Roseanne Barr, who is a tough, uninhibited performer. Sally Field's pandering kind of 'heart' couldn't be further from the spirit of comedy." -- David Denby, New York   Steel Magnolias: The leading ladies: Dolly Parton: "She is one of the sunniest and most natural of actresses," Roger Ebert wrote. Imagining that she probably saw Truvy as an against-type role, Hinson concluded it's still well within her wheelhouse. "She's just wearing fewer rhinestones." Sally Field: "Field, as always, is a lead ball in the middle of the movie," according to Denby . M'Lynn giving her kidney to Shelby brought out David's bitchy side. "I can think of a lot more Sally Field organs that could be sacrificed." Shirley MacLaine: "(She) attacks her part with the ferociousness of a pit bull," Hinson wrote. "The performance is so manic that you think she must be taking off-camera slugs of Jolt." (I agree. If there was anyone playing to the cheap seats in this movie, it's Shirley.) Olympia Dukakis: "Excruciating, sitting on her southern accent as if each obvious sarcasm was dazzlingly witty," Denby wrote. Daryl Hannah: "Miss Hannah's performance is difficult to judge," according to Canby, which seems to suggest he took a genuine "if you can't say something nice ..." approach. Julia Roberts: "(She acts) with the kind of mega-intensity the camera cannot always absorb," Canby wrote. That comment is so fascinating in light of the nearly 40 years Julia has spent as a Movie Star. She is big. It's the audience who had to play catch up. And on that drag-ish note ... The movie itself: "You feel as if you have been airlifted onto some horrible planet of female impersonators," Hinson wrote. Canby: "Is one supposed to laugh at these women, or with them? It's difficult to tell." Every review I read acknowledged the less than naturalistic dialogue in ways both complimentary (Ebert loved the way the women talked) and cutting (Harling wrote too much exposition, repeating himself like a teenager telling a story, Denby wrote). Harling wrote with sincerity and passion, Canby acknowledged, but it's still a work of "bitchiness and greeting card truisms." The ending was less likely to inspire feeling good as it was feeling relieved, according to Denby. "(It's) as if a group of overbearing, self-absorbed, but impeccable mediocre people at last exit from the house."
    • I tend to have two minds about Tawny (Kathy Najimy) fainting during Soapdish's big reveal. You're the costume designer, if anything, you should have known the whole time. I guess it's an application of what TV Tropes calls the "Rule of Funny." Every time I watch Delirious, I always want the genuine romance in John and Mariel's reunion at the deli counter to last longer. Film critics had their knives out for Sally in this period. I'll start a separate thread on the movies page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy