Jump to content

What is As the World Turns went to the CW?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Just a thought that I am throwing out there to see what people think. What is ATWT was picked up by The CW? After Tyra Banks Show goes off the air, The CW, will not have a daytime schedule as it stands at the moment. CBS does own half of the network, it would be possible to have the show transfer to that network and continue on. I have been thinking about this for awhile and just thought others may have a view on the show. I am one of those fans of ATWT that does not want to see the show go off the air. In my opinion it needs to continue as the longest running daytime show and not let the title be given to General Hospital.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

it would be a piss poor version of what the show has already become.

it would prob have to lose half the cast, and by half the cast im talking about the vets and big characters people dont wanna lose.

it would be much more youth focused.

it would lose prob half or so of the audience.

it would end up cancelled again, like passions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No, because obviously people didnt care about Jarlena & Payla! lol. I mean, how else do you explain ratings going up with their exits? lol.

And DAYS is not youth focused, not teen youth focused like The CW would make it. Days has 4 teens who are on around 2 times a week in a minor to supporting storyline.

And days happens to be better now than it has been in over a decade, IMHO.

Fact is, Days got lucky. They got a team of ppl in there who plotted out a good soapy story and it worked out well. It was a fluke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Fans need to start pimping the idea of a spin-off, not the original show moving to another network because that isn't going to work. Too expensive and there is the soap stigma. As I've said many times if you put together a pilot using material aired on ATWT, you could probably launch a new show based on the Snyder family or Jack and Carly moving to another city. It could be produced like a regular primetime show and would be appealing to a network like Lifetime. Hell, they could pitch tv movies to air on Hallmark. But moving the entire show would be expensive and the budget cuts would have fans complaining too mcuh. Plus the ratings wouldn't be there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't see why someone doesn't think of doing, as you said, a spinoff with say Jack and Carly moving to a new city. In what would probably be the most cost-effective solution ever why not have them move to New York with the kids, and do a daily websoap of 7 or 8 minute episodes which are then edited into an hour long episode shown once a week on a cable channel or something. It doesn't have to look cheap, Gotham and Venice have both shown you can have a good level of production values using digital handheld cameras and real life locations. Setting it New York City would prove ideal. Have Carly take on a job at a fashion PR company whilst Jack joins the NYPD as a detective. Throw their kids into the equation, add a handful of new characters (Carly's demanding, Kelly Cutrone-esque client, and a shady character Jack is investigating, a new love interest for Parker), create a mystery storyline to kick things off, and boom, you've got yourself a nice little treat for ATWT fans whilst opening the show up to a new audience on a network like, as you said, Lifetime. Who knows? Maybe it could stir up interest in the ATWT brand and it could return in some form.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Soap-related TV movies are something SoapNet should have tried their hands at years ago now. I remember bringing this up on WoST when they first started rerunning AW, they should have explored the idea of doing an AW TV movie or even a miniseries (5 one hour parts/two two hour parts?). OR have executive producers from the past like John Conboy or Linda Gottlieb get behind original telefilms, casting them with several familiar faces from daytime. I am all for the idea of them doing something similar with ATWT, they WOULD get the viewers, no question, and honestly, it could be a great pioneering effort for other shows that have already been cancelled or are most likely facing cancellation within the next few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That is just silly--'pale version of greatness'. The genre needs some form of 're-invention' and change isn't always a bad thing. As for the vets, they are never seen anyway so if a new network chose not to renew the contracts it would not greatly change the program. A budget needs to reflect revenue collected via ratings and, by that standard, World Turns is bloated and might be better served by a smaller cast. A good writer could really focus on a core grouping of characters and do them justice. I would rather see a great story with four characters involved than cheese with six and a vet tossed in for five minutes. There is no reason for any soap to have 25 people on contract. If we want the genre to survive and, maybe thrive, there will need to be some sort of major shift.

We like ATWT; however, a lot of people clearly do not or the ratings would be higher. I'm all for somone wrafting a show with broader appeal. I highly dislike when people just assume doom whenever a new idea pops up. Stuff like, 'the CW would ruin it!' or 'The should would die within one year' are silly statements not backed up with any sort of fact. The only fact that is clear is that all the soaps will be dead soon if something radical does not occur. Younger/new viewers are not avoiding soap like the plauge due to the disregarding of history. They do not even know the history. The only way soaps will continue is if someone can figure out why they have been rejected by an entire generation.

I do not buy Goutman's ideas about short attention span. I think the problem has more to do with the manner in which soaps are only aimed at female viewers in a time when gender roles have entirely changed. Soaps can't just be about candle light and romance anymore. They need to touch on broader ideas. I'd like seeing a storyline in which a husband feels uneasy with his wife making more money than him. Maybe a story about a stay at home father. Maybe a story about a guy dealing with his family breaking up and father's rights. A lot of men are at home during the day and are being totally ignored. Also, we need soaps that actually look like America in regards to race.

Moonves would never let ATWT onto the CW but it is a great idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm not really saying how the show would do on the CW, but it's never going to be picked up by the CW. Chances of the entire show being picked up by any network is slim. Even SOAPnet won't touch soaps. There is a bias against them and nobody is championing them, even in the industry. This is why I think it would be smarter to re-launch as a primetime spin-off. That way you can use all the press from the finale to launch the new show on Lifetime, SOAPnet, Hallmark, whatever. Also, it's easier for the new network to launch because new viewers who don't watch soaps wouldn't have to know all of the history and what not. Plus it's cheaper than re-launching a 50 year old soap. Has a soap ever had a successful network switch? I know with Passions the show DID do well. DirecTV used that show to launch it's 101 channel and kicked it to the curb as soon as it could. Other than that, SFT and EON struggled.

So I guess to sum things up, I'm all for the show continuing, but if you want it on CW or Lifetime or whatever, fans need to start talk of a spin-off or tv movies. If someone from the show sees that and thinks about pitching it a network might take a risk. A TV movie or pilot is cheaper and a more logical solution for now. We need to try something that makes sense in the age of declining ratings.

I also think how Hacienda Heights does, as the first new syndicated soap in decades, will decide a lot about the future of soaps off network.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy