Jump to content

Gotham: The Series


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

OK, watched it, and I liked it! They need to turn down the volume on the music but otherwise it was cool!

I liked the establishing of Michael Park's character having a daughter and someone threatening him, and his mother (?) not wanting him to see someone. I laughed at Martha Byrne giving herself a grand diva-ish first shot, but it was effective. I thought the gay guy was funny. I didn't think he was stereotypical or offensive.

The female friend character was meh so far, but I look forward to finding out more. We need to find out the names of these characters.

Then the cliffhanger ... Oooh, what's their connection?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree with the other criticisms especially the audio. Please, please fix the levels by the next episode or no one will be around for the third. And yes needs to be longer.

Pluses:

Martha Byrne can certainly work it.

Yay for the product placement. I'm glad to see she was able to get Nicole Miller and the Diamond Exchange. Stuff like that actually makes the lead character look like a wealthy socialite. Nice way to work their connections.

Bottom line, this is an experiment and I'm in it. I wish them the best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So far, based on what I read on other boards, people have mixed reviews about the episode. Of course, it's the first episode, but this whole "hiring friends" phenom is pity.

I think these web series need to be more music video driven storytelling than anything.

Overall, the production model look like a big budget '70's porn flick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What I realized is that web soaps with former soap stars will end up being what they think "soaps" should look like. For instance, Gotham will pretty much be a more updated version of ATWT with some Lipstick Jungle thrown in.

Venice will be a vehicle for gay girls, a la L-Word with soap stars.

Wedlocked,pretty much is a light hearted version of both of the actors real life (recently married) lives.

And the list goes on.....

What I won't expect is innovative or edgy storytelling or diversity from any of the major web soaps/series. Which is why I will probably continue to tune in elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Obviously, they should have developed a pilot, understood their mistakes and what was happening and then went ahead and shot a full season, edited everything together and then ran each episode back-to-back. This every other Monday is gonna make the show fall off the map with soap viewers.

Really?! Then that's not a webseries...that's a pilot or a short indie film that's been broken into segments. And that's so annoying.

Serials are known as such because, yes, there's a continuing story, but each episode should be self contained and have it's own beginning, middle, and end.

I didn't think Gotham was all that bad on a technical standpoint, but if the goal is to show that you can do it better than a daytime soap, then you've got to up the stakes on all levels, including technical. But for me, the story is more important than everything else. And there wasn't any here.

The Taster's Choice commercials had more story than Gotham and they were minute long clips every two-three months.

:lol::lol::lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Gotham was not exactly stellar but as I said in the Venice thread, at least it attempted, in its backwards, drunken way, to follow one old Irna Phillips rule of mini-radio soap - exposition and characterization under severe time constraint. That's what Gotham tried to do with MP in the car. Venice didn't bother introducing anyone. The vibe was "here's Otalia, here's Galen Gering, go."

They should've saved the Michael Park intro for later, though. Fact is I watched that first episode for Martha Byrne, and if your show is written and starring a grande dame of soaps, you need to have her in the pilot front and center for three to five minutes straight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I take back any compliments I may have given. Episode 2 was absolutely dreadful. Lisa Brown wrote this? Really? It's like they wrote a 60-minute episode, then decided to try and cram all of that script's story beats into under five minutes instead of doing what websoaps apparently hate to do: Accommodating for the length. Kissing in front of a crowd for no reason? The music? The sound? The slow motion? Martha looks high, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Maeve Kinkead was Vanessa, basically. She had to stand up there and make it look good while, in some sort of truncated display of soapy plotting, Martha Byrne turns away from the crowd of people to stare at the floor in the middle of Maeve's speech. Maeve was fine. Everyone and everything else was not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Claybon said Samantha and Tyrell were initially 6 and 7, but aged up for technical reasons, first aged up to 10 or 11, and then finally to 16 and 17. Is that the first time soap children have been SORASed twice before ever airing?
    • Please register in order to view this content

      Is this someone you should be dealing with? I got the drama on lock. Leave it to me. You are my sister. You have loved & protected me every moment I've been in this world. It's my turn to stand up for you.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      Is this someone you should be dealing with? I got the drama on lock. Leave it to me. You are my sister. You have loved & protected me every moment I've been in this world. It's my turn to stand up for you.
    • I just watched it, it was decent, looking forward to Martin's secret. Glad to get info on why the children were aged up!
    • !!! I felt the same. Martin secret has always been my favorite storyline.  I happen to Andre's wardrobe but it ages him. They have a grandpa vibe.

      Please register in order to view this content

      , Facts! I would like to see something like that in Daytime. Both of y'all can back up off my husband! Tomas couldn't shine his shoes.
    • Brandy was an odd mish-mash of a character. A radical during her college days, then a journalist/romance writer, I believe? But not so much of a radical that she had a problem chasing millionaire Alan, LOL. The actress, JoBeth Williams, went on to have a pretty good movie and prime time career.
    • Bill attempts to use Smitty to send a veiled thread to Martin.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      Thought I’d share this video featuring Cathy Carricaburu, now Foxhoven, who played Nancy Becker from 1976-1978.

      Please register in order to view this content

      She talks a little about her acting career starting around the 6 minute mark and briefly mentions Y&R. I’d be interesting to see some of her work on Y&R since it seems to be her most notable role.
    • I believe Henry Slesar intended that the Paige/Nola plot would play out over three to six months and Paige would be the new younger ingenue; but a few things happened. Sharon Gabet didn't renew her contract and the audience didn't like the Paige/Brian romance as it flirted with incest. Kim Hunter revealed in an interview that she as slated for 3 months but Henry asked her to stay on for an additional period. I watched Edge during this period when it originally aired and Margaret Colin was not great in the role. She seemed very green among the vets as was the dude playing Brian. He was poorly cast which was unusual for Edge.  I think Henry started to get pressure from ABC and P&G to jazz up the show given what was exploding under Monty on GH at the time. I loved Kim as Nola and all the stories it generated for others. Miles and Deborah in particular. But the next who dunnit plot in this period was not one of Henry's best (at least for me the culprit and explanation were lame for Henry). 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy