Jump to content

November 9-13, 2009


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 109
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

GH is the most poorly edited soap. The episodes are choppy and sometimes nonsensical because TPTB are so desperate to give the A list characters more airtime. The A list characters get repetitive inane lengthy scenes, while the B-list characters get 45 scenes stuck in between the the A-listers. The show has absolutely no balance which is why it makes me laugh when people say that the show is better. Yesterday's episode was so poorly edited that it was incoherent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah I know Y&R doesn't deserve to be that high.

Atleast I agree with you on how you put B&B, DAYS, and ATWT. I thought you didn't watch ATWT or am I wrong. I think I should change it to what you said, but I don't want any of the soaps to go down, just go up or stay the same.

I put Y&R that high cause they usually rebound after losing alot of viewers same with B&B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

General Hospital Is the Most Violent Show on Television

And why an A-list star would agree to be on it.

Posted: Thursday, November 19, 2009 8:00am

By Willa Paskin

There was a comment in the other ratings thread re: Franco not being picked up in main stream media

and here is another one of the many articles that have been released re: his appearance

it also lends to our discussion of how soap operas are viewed by non fans (I guess)

sorry if it doesn't belong here I'll move it to its rightful spot

the joint is so big I get confuwse-ted sometimes.

http://www.doublex.com/section/arts/general-hospital-most-violent-show-television

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I just read that article and anyone who thinks GH is the most violent show on TV doesn't watch a whole lot of primetime. GH has very fake violence and they hardly ever show anything graphic. I've seen much worse on Criminal Minds, never mind cable shows like Dexter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think some of them have big differences. B&B is unique, for better or worse. Aside from the horrible gender roles, OLTL is different from most of the soaps. DAYS is different from most of the soaps.

I think AMC is now more and more of a GH clone. The main difference is AMC has no mob, but then, they don't need an official one thanks to Ryan, Zach, etc. Y&R is also similar to GH these days.

GH wants to be different, but really isn't. All the tough guys are really pouty little boys, never able to do much beyond feel sorry for themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In production values and casting, I agree. In writing, they're both so bad. Every time I almost think GH might have a leg up, we get absolutely horrible weeks like this one, with Dante/Lulu ("HOW CAN YOU LIVE WITH YOURSELF?") and Niz. The way they squander opportunities keeps on surprising me.

The show wants to be much edgier than it actually is. Deep down, it's some parody of a teenage girl and her swooning over the pudgy guy who has a beat up leather jacket and has been held back in high school a few too many years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Note to makeup - Smitty’s eyebrows, bad clamshell look.  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Okay I can buy that when Brook Lynn was a teen.  Now she knows the child is a boy one would think she'd be slightly suspicious.  Then again, Gio looks nothing like either of them so maybe not lol.
    • I've been behind & just got caught up & the last 3 days were amazing!
    • Yeah.  The hot, poor bad boy with a chip on his shoulder but with a heart of gold was a common soap trope in the 80s 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's been an issue with me... the lack of a cohesive 'Have Not' crowd that has focus other than Leslie/Eva.   I would beef up Jan, Mona, Laura, Joey, and few other male characters.. and not just be out to overthrow the Duprees.. but co-existing and broadening the scope of the show since the show is called Beyond the Gates. I think the set up the show has with everything revolving around the Duprees will become predictable especially if they always win.   It would be like Victor Newman on Y & R for 40+ years.. always winning, hardly ever losing.   With MVJ/Guza.. both trained under that mindset... I fear that will happen.   I've always heard from a performer that is playing a character like Leslie/Dana that you have to find the victim/hurt beneath the surface in order to play a villain/villainess... and I think that's why I enjoy watching her.. because she brings so much more to the part than what the writers put on the page.
    • I figure that was really hard for Dom to do. I completely GET why they wrote it the way they did but I wonder if it was necessary. Meanwhile I have 2 really icky ideas in my head. Drew is going to blame Tracy KNOWING it was not her. Dante is going to blame Lulu.  After that, everyone else is going to be mad at Lois.  Tracy is going to double down on wanting to get rid of Sonny. Sonny's going to be more dug in to stay because he now has a new descendant. 
    • I can actually buy Brook Lynn being so self-absorbed and incurious that she never thought to question why her mom and grandma were so attached to Gio. 
    • It was overkill and the whole narrative Lois was too nice to the orphan kid when he was little, WHAT? Like Emma said no one thinks Gio is a troublemaker that gets 14-year-old kids drunk for fun. That being said, Lulu figured this Gio thing out in episode, but Brook Lynn never once questioned Lois and Gloria's attachment to a child that was the same age as the baby she gave up?  Ever?
    • Thanks for finding that. I may have been thinking of this blog entry.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy