Jump to content

OLTL: Discussion for the week October 19


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 127
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

UGH I dunno why I even bother, but today in the Rex and Gigi story we had a perfect example of the one thing I really hate in RC's writing.; I am not even REMOTELY convinced that Rex, after how badly lies have ruined his life, promises not to keep secrets, etc, wouldn't tell Gigi that he had to do very important business for his sister and simply not to mention it to John--and that she couldn't keep her mouth shut. It's such a piss poor, obvious way to make them again at odds with each other and have Gigi take off with Sky Yes it's just one tiny plot point but it feels to me like a tiny repeat of the whole hated plot contrivance that got us here in the first place--Gigi's lie to Rex.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They took the Leah Bauer route!

When they did this with Leah, it was crazy and insulting to fans, but Rick had not had any real storyline for years anyway, and the son he had who was born several years before Leah was not seen oncamera.

This girl is now quite a bit older than Jack, who was born over a year and a half before her, and she's only a few years younger than Starr, even though the custody battle over infant Starr was the entire reason Todd and Tea got together in the first place. So now are we supposed to believe that Todd and Tea and the island happened only a year or two into their relationship? Is this a way to whitewash more of that ugly history between Todd and Tea (the punch and the glass coffin and all the rest)?

Then we have Rachel repeatedly refer to Todd as this child's "real" father. I'm not going to claim this is an insult to Ross, because he's not a good father either, but like with the Rex/Shane stuff last year, it's kind of sad to repeatedly get the idea that being a sperm donor is all you need to be a great dad. Look at how much good Rex has done Shane since then. They also did this with Starr keeping her baby even though she's really not in a great position right now to raise a child. OLTL was one of the few shows which for years presented a picture of adoptive parents as truly being a parent, not a temporary solution or an interloper or a distant memory. I'm sorry that daytime no longer allows that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, the kid is Danielle, who IS 15, haha. They did some major SORAS messing up this time. However, I'm going to believe that she had twins or something and Tom is also Tea's child, but possibly with Ross. Or the other way...either way, they're each kids of Tea's with different fathers.

I actually think it's funny how absurd Kim is. I thought the Matthew line was supposed to be endearing, not sickening.

And yea, Tea and Rachel are good together. But since when were they roommates? I thought Rachel's only roommate was Marty...unless they've swapped Tea with Marty for whatever reason, or she had two. Tea and Rachel as roommates was never shown, right? Either way, Rachel and Tea look closer in age than Rachel and Marty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I haven't watched todays episode yet and was wondering are we 100% this girl (who I don't believe I've seen yet) is the child? I thought it was going to be up in the air whether the boy or girl was the child, but everyone seems sure it's her. I'm confused.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ugh! I could not agree more. I'm not adopted and I don't know anyone who is, but the way soaps portray adopted parents is so offensive to me. I think if I were an adoptive parent I wouldn't watch any soap at all, I would be so pissed at the insensitive, unrealistic portrayal they receive. I just don't understand wth these shows are thinking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Blair is PATHETIC. I cant beleive she threw herself at Todd. Her lie was so dumb. Tea doesnt love Todd and was only trying to scam him for all his money. Tea has her own money! She's not bleeding for cash as she's a very successful lawyer and is independetly wealthy. I cant beleive she was really trying to convince Todd that Tea was out for his money. Bitch please

nah we saw the girl today. She called Tea. Danielle came across as a brat and little b-tch, not the sweet little angel she described to Rachel. In fact Id describe her as the teen we all thought Starr would have grown up to be!

I have no issues with SORASing but they must ALWAYS keep it in order, espicially when it comes to siblings. Any child of Todd and Tea's concieved on that island should be younger than Jack. If they wanted Todd to have a 15 yr old daughter, then they should have SORASed Jack to 16, which is bad in and of itself. This girl should have been no older than 8. Todd JUST went through the teenage daughter storylines with Starr; another isnt needed yet.

I didnt realize this either but it all came out during Matt's trial when Tea had her on the witness stand. Their past friendship was brought up
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Which is strange, since she has the most propped parents in all of Llanview. We'll be getting more of those Tea tears when her daughter calls her a whore, or whatever.

I guess they will have her come to town, clash with Starr, try to make a play for Cole.

On the roommate thing, I think Georgie moved in when Tea moved out, right?

I'm surprised they've never considered bringing Georgie back, at least in Rachel's nightmares. I guess she moved on to giving Port Charles residents nightmares.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think OLTL has it right with Jess/Clint, although that's not exactly an adoption. I've only been watching the show about 5 years and I don't even know which of Vikki's children are biologically Clint's because he acts like they all are, which I really like. I even like Natalie/Roxy's relationship. Roxy wasn't the best Mom in the world, but Natalie still loves her and she still considers Rex her brother.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The Buchanans, but also Cassie, Andrew, and River, and then more recently, Dorian and Langston.

Over the past few years OLTL has moved further towards the whole "real parent" cliche. They tell us that biology means you're a brilliant parent. They really pushed this with Rex and Shane, even though the only lesson Shane has learned from Rex that calling Gigi a slut and a whore is perfectly acceptable.

I guess this is more of the Frons narrative. We got the same garbage over at AMC, where Julia was brutally murdered for the "happy ending" of Tad being reunited with Kathy, only for Tad to neglect her, expect Krystal to raise her singlehandedly, and dump her off on Opal.

I don't even really get how Todd's storyline is enhanced by bringing in yet another child. Do they think a child somehow validates a relationship? He has two children with Blair and that relationship is beyond dead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

GL managed to do it with Susan on GL, she still loved her adoptive father Jim Lemay. They ignored all that, and took about 5 years off her age, when they brought her back as Daisy.

Even when stories aren't about adoption, OLTL still ends up turning it into some "he's a good parent because he's the biodad" contortion. I guess they think if we see some third party that we obviously aren't supposed to root for, like Brody with Shane, Ross with this girl, then we will be reminded of the "real" parent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • It seemed to be your intent. coming into a thread I started and making multiple posts saying my data was wrong. In the next paragraph you say "Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why." That certainly didn't stop you from immediately saying the data was wrong, until I provided additional receipts. Why did you not check the daily episode guide (for instance, this one for the 1980's) I posted for the world to see for exactly this reason...to help confirm airdates: http://daytimeroyaltyonline.com/days-daily-summaries-1980-1989-t15361.html? That is what you should be checking BEFORE you make any posts in the future like this, trying to suggest something from my data is incorrect. You could have also messaged me and asked me why your dates weren't adding up with what the correct data is. I would have fast forwarded through that video you posted, spotted Roman and Hope and immediately have told you that was the 11/1/83 episode.
    • Jason, just let me say that it was not my intent to any way impugn any of your data  or research. I'm very sorry if it came out that way. Obviously the person I got these 4 November episodes from has mislabeled files, multiples, which I was certainly unaware of.  When I am editing it is all about what I see & hear. Later, I find time for greater reflection.  Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why.  If you find you are no longer interested in the edit, that is fine. I have no ego in this. I did it only to share it.
    • I feel like Vernon and Anita need to not be hypocrites and try and take the heat off Bill in this case. It's clear that the family used him as a fixer and especially knowing he helped with Martin's situation, they need to either be quiet or support him. BTW...with Vanessa being in the hospital for food poisoning, am I the only one who thought Shanice was gonna say she's pregnant or had an STD? The only reason I say STD is because she hasn't had any memorable sex partners, but I definitely don't believe she just had food poisoning.
    • Yeah, I mean I know that the name still pertains. I just laugh at it not now being called Arizona Dust, but, I admit it simply does not have the same ring to it. Above, that is interesting that Arizona had already come up before the crisis. 
    • Leslie and her family are from Chicago? Anita's background also includes being a former Chi-Town native? Might they connect this and go somewhere with it?
    • Honestly who's to say Leslie even birthed Eva, I mean she's a liar, I wouldn't believe a word she says about Eva being Ted's(or hers)
    •   1. 11/1/83 cast/set list:  

      Please register in order to view this content

          The "11/2/83" video you posted of Ruth Buzzi's scenes includes Roman and Hope in them, meaning the video you posted is actually 11/1/83, since Roman and Hope aren't in 11/2/83.   2. The video you posted of "11/2/83" has scenes with Roman and Hope. As you can see from my cast/set list, Roman and Hope are not in the 11/2/83 episode (see above note):   4573...11/2/83: Cast: Mickey, Julie, Doug, Maggie, Neil, Don, Marie, Alex, Liz, Andre as Tony, Gwen, Chris, Eugene, Sandy, Letitia, Charlene, Mrs. Whiting, Wanda/Guard, Dave, Delia, Saleslady # 1, Saleslady # 2, Figure in Dark, Raven/animal, Cats/animals, Birds/animals.   2.  11/3/83 :My video collection starts with 11/4/83. so I don't have the 11/1/83 or 11/3/83 video, but in addition to the cast/set list for 11/3/83, here is also the parking clearance call sheet for that day, showing Ruth was not only in the cast/set list but did work that day:     They even had hired the animal trainer and all the animals for the day, so It's sort of a certainty that her scenes were not cut that day, or it would have been a big waste of the budget. 3. As for 11/7/83, I just fast-forwarded through that whole episode myself. Letitia is in it from start to finish. It's her big final episode where she is killed. She starts the episode saying "Eugene, are you there?" In the next act, Marlena shows up and meets Letitia's lion. Later in the episode, Letitia is killed by "Eugene" (the Salem Slasher in a Eugene mask).   So, as we can see from your own post, the 11/2/83 date you have listed on that video is incorrect, since Hope and Roman are in that video but not in the 11/2/83 episode.It seems the dates you have on all your early November 1983 episodes are incorrect.   When you post videos and suggest that my data is incorrect, do you not first compare who is in the scenes and see if that matches who is in the episode? You didn't do that with the "11/2/83" episode, which based on Roman and Hope being in it means that is actually 11/1/83. Best to do something like that first before suggesting my data and research is incorrect.
    • Within the Dupree family, I predict Vernon/Anita will be conflicted about what to do about Bill and his role in the whole Ted/Silk Press Sheila situation... especially since Bill knows where the particular bone about Martin is buried. Dani, Chelsea, and Naomi's reactions to what Bill possibly did isn't hard to guess.. but Hayley's reactions will be interesting to hear.  Especially given her recent pregnancy scare.. she might not be so much on Bill's side, or she'll totally surprise us and be totally on Bill's side.   Either way, I think Martin's secret will be the main focus in May sweeps.. with the fall out of the Eva secret playing out in the background... while the Joey/Vanessa/Doug thing continues to boil/develop.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy