Jump to content

Eden Riegel getting hate mail!


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Why should Eden extend to continue to play out an insulting story towards the lesbian community where a lesbian is not really gay just because they have not met the right man yet. ER did right for viewers who tuned into AMC in the belief that a real honest lesbian love story was going to written by AMC and refuse to play along.

There is no reason for her to help AMC/Pratt when they purposely wrote Bianca as a supporting player in her storyline.

As far as the contract, it was stated in SOD that AMC tried everything to get a certain actress to extend in January and that she would leave next month. That was obviously ER.

When JHC already spoiled in February the happy ending for Bianca/Reese, AMC already knew probably by December that both TB and ER were leaving. It would have been already decided.

I am frustrated with AMC being so cavalier with ER when she signs on, then to expect her to extend in order to continue their degrading storyline for Bianca.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

There are many reasons why Bianca is a beloved character and why ER is cherished in the role. When ER stumbled upon the scene in 2000, I, for one, was happy we finally had a Bianca who was halfway decent acting-wise. TPTB had cast some perfectly wretched little girls before that time.

So we have a character who is a "legacy" character of one of the best-known characters in daytime. We also have a major "coming-out" storyline and some intriguing storylines centered around the character that are dramatic (the baby switch), sensational (Zarf) and fresh (initially, the lesbian wedding). We've grown up with the character and have seen her through many trials and tribulations. Ironically, Bianca may be the classic heroine in daytime tradition, although she is a lesbian and not the goody-goody (read: bland), no matter how the writers try to paint her.

Not only that, but we have a green actress who, again MHO, grew in her acting abilities on the screen as we were watching. I'm not saying ER is Meryl Streep or even "up there" among daytime's greatest actresses, but she does more than fill the bill of whatever the storyline is requiring. She is (maybe has) been a very likeable actress, both in her portrayal and in her dealings with the press prior to leaving. I, for one, enjoy ER as Bianca and am usually interested when she is onscreen unlike some of AMC's performers.

I do not fault ER for her yo-yo commitment to AMC. I think it's a sweet gig for her, and I'd do it too, if my job let me. I dare anyone to say who wouldn't. Take a job that is a steady paycheck, but lets you off every so often to take a wonderful vacation, pursue side projects and yet know that if the paycheck is there, you could always go back. Obviously ER is interested in doing "bigger" things, but let's face it, she's done this for several years now; no one is biting, save the occasional appearance on Law and Order or CSI. Her husband had an ingenious idea with IB, and that could also be a new avenue for ER.

I fault AMC somewhat, because of the way they trot her on to lure viewers back in. We've lamented over and over on these boards about soaps not "playing the beats" these days. How we're treated to one sweeps stunt after another with nothing of substance or rushing to the next in between. Bianca is AMC's sweeps stunt. I think it works for them too. I don't know who was freakin' fooled by Bianca leaving in February of this year. I thought I initially read she would only be around so long, so I wasn't surprised. So why was Pratt? I blame the writers for not plotting the story out so that it made sense when she left. Instead Bianca was yanked out from underneath the story and Reese was left dangling. Pratt has great story ideas, but he has poor plotting. He has no concept of the beats of a storyline; he is a premature ejaculator as a writer. Why should this have been any different for the Breese storyline? I didn't see the Zarf storyline end abruptly under McTavish/random writers and that was during a transition!

And I don't think it has anything to do with the lesbian storylines either. I do think it has to do with why ER chooses to come back sometimes, but she comes back for one-day stints when it's not about lesbianism too (Kendall's trials/comas/etc.) Are people angry about how AMC has treated its lesbian storylines? Sure. However, I think that has nothing to do with why AMC won't recast or why they won't "write for Bianca." OR why ER doesn't stay or "leaves abruptly."

So ER is getting hate mail? Whatever. Without knowing what the mail is for, it's not my place to comment on whether it is deserved or not. Is she using AMC moving to LA for publicity? Sure she is, but so do a zillion other actresses. Just this week, I was watching something and Tom Green was making a comment. Why was he there and what for? Publicity, plain and simple. To stay in the public eye. That's the name of the game in Hollywoodland. I don't fault ER for doing it; the public is obviously begging for a comment. Alexa Havins management gave one too. Any day now, so will Budig's. It's par for the course. Let ER rest.

If Bianca wants to come back full time or wants to show up for periodic storylines or wants to never come to AMC again, I'll live with it. It's just a show. There was an AMC pre-Bianca/ER and there will be/has been one after.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Eden can and shall not pipe down. It is her duty as Patron Saint of Lesbian Viewers and Living Embodiment of the lousy GenX/GenY work ethic to continue to play the gay press, soap press and fans. Tweet, Eden, Tweet.

How brave she is to still be able to mock the petty concerns of her former cast and crew when she, yes She, has had to endure a nasty letter or two. I don't know how she goes on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know, right? She's a fave of mine but I have no problem with the thought of her never returning to AMC. Recast and move on if that's what they want. I started backing off on Bianca when they used her to prop Babe.

But this level of venom? Who knew?!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She ain't holding the show hostage. There are no people on the show that are being held back by her being gone. If you want to look at an example of a show being held hostage by as actress, the best one I can come up with is Nadia Bjorlin and Days. They wouldn't let Brady move on to someone other than Chloe because of Nadia's coming and goings on the show a few years ago. They had to put Brady in a obsessive story with Nicole that was just Broe angst even though NB wasn't on the show and lasted till NB came back for significant amount of time so they could marry off Broe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

ER isn't holding anybody hostage. TIIC are the ones who playing games. You can tell by what they done to all her love interest. The reason why the character was front & center in the past because they didn't have to write her a love interest. Now she needs a love interest the character can come & go as they want her too. It's up TIIC if the characters stays or go that's why they don't recast the part because that means writing a love interest for the character.

Like somebody post when they want the character to return ER doesn't have a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No. I think Kelly and Daisy stopped dropping by because there was no one left in Pine Valley under the age of sixty to whom they had the slightest connection. Who are they going to visit: Ryan? Randi? Even the octogenarians they knew had basically become once a year drop-ins themselves. It was a stretch for Kelly and Angie to pretend to know each other at Myrtle's funeral since their time on the show didn't overlap. Maybe we'll see Daisy if Palmer ever dies, but I think we're more apt to see Gaskill's Bobby than Spencer or even Miller.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • Andrew sure has hard nips.
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy