Jump to content

July 6-10, 2009


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I don´t understand how anyone can be happy the ratings fell. Sorry, but if this isn´t some temporarily fluctuation related with MJ burial or atleast summer and holidays it just shows all soaps will be done much sooner than we thought. The numbers are down across the board so no sane producer will read it as a sign another HW/EP change is needed. He will read it as the sign the genre is dying and there is no point to try to save it anymore. There is not even a glimmer of hope. If there was just one soap which would go steadily up while the rest is falling, TPTB would no doubt noticed and copy as they always do. But there is nothing. That some soaps which were absolutely awfull last year are a little better this year on one particular week really doesn´t count. There is still no sign of a recipe which could turn the trend around. It´s depressing.

I have no proof for this, but I believe any soap which gets below 2.0 in HH and 1.0 in 18-38 is in a direct danger of cancelation. So the numbers are terrifying. I don´t believe any ABC soap is profitable right now and the budget cuts which are no doubt coming will be drastic. Poor DAYS is still holding by a thread but let´s face it, there is nothing to cut anymore. The show is cheap as hell, with a few sets and poor production values. If they fall just an inch lower that´s it, the point of no return.

Not even Y/R is safe. The demos aren´t so much better than the rest and all these vets and lavish production values are expensive. Soon the show will have to start to cut too and unlike DAYS Y/R cannot exists without its vets. The moment the show starts to cut them, people will revolt and we will see the same vicious cycle of viewers leaving and more cuts coming we saw with all the soaps before.

Not good at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

GH has lost 600,000+ viewers in a year? That's sad. Especially after the big investment to go to HD. But otherwise it just seems like all the shows bump up .1, then drop .1, and shuffle order a little. Granted nobody should be popping champagne but it seems like most of the shows are fairly stable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Most shows are somewhat stable with a downward trend, but GH has been dropping hard in just in the last 3-4 months.

As for how I can be "happy" the ratings are down. I don't know. If they can't tell good stories anymore and they won't make an effort to save the genre, then maybe the genre deserves to die.

Am I happy about that? No.

It sucks.

But am I supposed to sit there and keep watching crap I don't enjoy just so that crap will continue to air and nothing will ever change?

It's a catch-22 and the fans are stuck being damned if we do and damned if we don't. The only difference is if we do watch, at least cast and crew keep their jobs. I feel bad that the industry in general suffers because the creative minds at the top are burned out or too egotistical to actually try to save things. Because I like the actors and characters. I'm sure the crews work really hard -- even moreso with budget cuts. It's all someone's livelihood. But that's not on me to maintain. That's on the shoulders of the people who make the decisions, set the story arcs, define the canvas, etc. And no one's holding them responsible . . . . except in the one way we can which is just to turn it off.

I'd much rather they save the shows, believe me. I think soaps can and should be a relevant viewing option. But they should be an entertaining one and, for me, more and more they're just not. And I'm so irritated by this point that I just have very little care left anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

ALL the current soaps turn a profit. Otherwise, they would've already been canceled. Even GL was turning a profit when it was canceled; but it wasn't a big enough profit for CBS, and CBS felt they might have better margins with cheaper programming there (which is why they're going with a gameshow).

There's no real number we can point to and say "that's the number" that can get a show canceled. It varies. For instance, the ABC shows can dip lower than the other non-network owned shows and still turn a profit. Before ABC cancels any of their shows, you can expect them to attempt to cut out all but the cheapest talent (in other words, look for Susan Lucci, Cameron Mathison, Erika Slezak, Kassie DePaiva, Steve Burton, Tony Geary, Maurice Benard, and others, to be long gone by the time their repsective shows have been canceled).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

ABC firing Geary, Bernard and Burton before GH is canceled? I'll believe when I see it. I see the 3 of them along with Guza and Phelps going down with the ship. They will take pay cut after pay cut to remain big fishes in their ever shrinking ponds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think what happened with DAYS makes me see ABC making such a move. They fired a bunch of expensive veterans who many thought were not expendable, and ratings are actually up.

I could see GH shifting the focus to the young ones, and offering MB and SB such low-ball offers that they have to walk.....or, taking a cue from DAYS, just not offering them anything except a "See ya."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, but CBS didn't own GL outright. ABC owns their soaps. I thought that made a difference in profit. So that may be why AMC and GH are still on even though they go heavily overbudget.

Supposedly ABC almost cancelled AMC several times over the past few years because of their budget problems, and only thing like Susan Lucci taking big pay cuts kept them afloat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It is painful watching GH. Spinnelli is so annoying. Now Maxie has turned into such an idiot and the actress has become so hammy. Add to that the fact that the show continues to reward really bad behavior -- I can't believe they are letting Claudia get away with shooting Michael -- and you have a really lousy show. GH deserves its ratings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • On the way to her own engagement party? I've read that the show had trouble getting the audience to sympathize with Rita, but...that seems bizarre. Maybe I can understand the issue with the censors, given that at the time, rape wasn't depicted the way it is now, and marital rape was even less acknowledged.  Wasn't Chris Brooks' rape one of the first honest stories on the subject?
    • Yes it was! My mom and I convinced my dad to get one. He was--how shall I put this?--on the thrifty side, but one day he came home with one as a surprise. To this day, I'm convinced it fell off a truck. (He knew people with "connections."

      Please register in order to view this content

      ) BUT, we had our VCR and we could watch our soaps. That thing lasted forever! It was built like a tank. Even when we got new ones with more features, we kept that one.
    • Please register in order to view this content

        Blasphemy!  (Haha, I get it.  But, you should try watching AMC! 80s-90s was so good.)
    • I thought about saying how I resented the fact that those two newbies were tripping up the Puppetmaster of all Puppetmasters, when the best others could do was a stalemate (or less...). But, well...*sigh*
    • I read years ago that both Zaslow and Lenore both complained that it came off as a seduction because of CBS censors, so Lenore asked if she could say, "you raped me" to leave no doubt with the audience, and that Zaslow insisted that Holly's rape played realistically 
    • Wow it’s official, Gatwa is out… https://www.avclub.com/ncuti-gatwa-addresses-doctor-who-finale-statement DW fandom on Reddit is in a furor over how things went down and apparent last minute scrapping of the original ending. Also…Billie Piper again really?
    • He comes pretty close, talkin' about how Reva is full of love and joy, blah blah....which is bilge considering he was the one responsible for throwing her out of Josh's life over working with Alan. 
    • Just watched the episode concerning Olivia's drug use and Abby's persistence, etc. Donna Mills did stellar work in this episode, as did Tonya Crowe and Brian Austin Green (Brian).
    • But by Dinah and Hart...Hart especially looked as if he could not tie his own shoes!  Ed, Holly, Alan, Alex Henry and Vanessa among others were not able to put Roger down....Dinah???
    • The preaching seems to end before the Barnes settle in late December, 1981. The stuff that felt overly religious (the Davidsons believing a miracle will save Lori rather than a surgeon, Jeff's miraculous recovery from a beam of light) was quickly nixed because it wasn't working. The closest thing that you get to that under the Barnes is when Dennis Fraser, the drunk driver who killed Nora and Scott, turns his life over to god. The born-again redemptions out of nowhere seem to stop fairly early into the Barnes' run. I do think Miriam's transformation was much more delicately done with her turning on her bestie Nancy because Nancy was seducing Charles, Miriam's wealthy father, so Miriam offers to testify for the Davidsons in the trial against Nancy over possession of Nora's house. In turn, Nancy repays the favor by pumping an emotionally distraught Miriam with barbituates while Miriam carries on her affair with low level thug turned political aide Norm Elliott. Miriam is used by everyone into her life and finally lands herself in the hospital becasue she has become so addicted to the pills. At the hospital, it is the friendship and kindness of the Davidsons that brings Miriam to a more peaceful place. The Davidsons ability to forgive is both appealing and, at times, dramatically limiting. In this case, the Davidsons lead Miriam to her new Mama, Ione Redlon. Now, under Vinley, Miriam is determined to reconnect with her son, Frederick, and her ex-husband, Paul.   My bigger issue with the Barnes' writing is that they write the storylines with twist endings that sorta come out of nowhere. I know the resolution to the Kate Carrouthers mystery sorta plays out like that so I am curious to see how I feel about that.  The biggest change throughout the writing teams has been the view of morality. Winsor had many characters who could be viewed purely through the lens of black and white, but others explored the shades of gray (often younger people). The brief head writerless period was much better at embracing an action doesn't make a person and there characters were much more gray or at least evil at a more local level (Nancy, in this period, only flirts with her brother-in-law where as later she is actively providing pills to Miriam to keep her addicted and away from her own father). The Barnes, for the most part, seem to embrace this level of political corruption that seems to permeate throughout the show making it clear that power (as well as money) is the root of evil. Even criminal Vince Cardello is presented as less evil than Charles Carpenter, though Carpenter's murder of a resident of his complex was rewritten to relieve Carpenter of any responsibility in the matter. Vinley's work seems more into exploring the why or delving deeper in general. Babs Farley, the hooker who is looking to reclaim her life, is such an intriguing character. She is given such meaningful monologues regretting her decisions and desperately trying to keep away from the hands of her former pimp, Ron Washington, who hasn't appeared yet. Monk and Fernandez seem to be wrongly accused of Lori's attack and there seems to be hints of racism that the show is looking to address. Marianne confronts Gil about his feelings towards God in relation to their mother's death years earlier.  There does seem to be a layer of misogyny to Vinley's work, but it's early so I'll be curious to see how this plays out. There are a lot of attacks on women (Lori is nearly raped, Babs was beaten, Nancy is on the verge of being blackmailed for sex by Tab, and the Russ / Marianne / Gil scenario has hints of toxic masculinity. It's very early so it'll be neat to see if that is maintained.  Jerry TImm lasts about a year I think (March, 1982 - March, 1983). One of the episodes on TouTube has a comment suggesting that Timm was fired by CBN because he had done something in his past that came to light. It didn't seem to be clear what that was.  I like what I've seen of Timm as Gil. He has such a presence that it covers up some of his weaker acting choices. It's unfortunate that he didn't get to play as much of the Gil - Stacey - Amber triangle as his replacement does.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy