Jump to content

Y&R: Week of April 06, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 480
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Mark H, I don't mind the Baldwin/Fishers, but they need to stop dragging their story lines on to point we overdose on them. The Kevin storyline should have been a week, not a month and he is so damaged they could have accomplished his break down in that time. I don't think they are interested in redeeming Gloria because of her reactions in the train car scenes. That woman really should have come on the scene proclaiming that it was all her fault, she's the one who didn't protect baby Kevin, when she was the only one who could, and if she had, none of this would have ever happened. Instead she comes on in a grand look at me in my helicopter gesture and immediately goes to support her bastard husband instead of being a mother to her son. That tells me they want her to remain completely unsympathetic. Hopefully Victor will get her to do something and she'll finally go up the river for years off screen, or escape to LA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was. I really was. Until this kevin storyline.

They NEED to go. Gloria, Jeff, Kevin, and Jana HAVE to go. NOW. Michael they can rebuild.

But the fishwin family really is just too much. they do to much, they get away too much, they add nothing. and i love the entire cast of family, but the characters do not work for me. not anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think after this storyline, Kevin needs to be done with the Terrible Tom stuff. I mean, DONE. The only time I can ever see it coming back is when he and Jana eventually have kids, with Kevin struggling with his instinctive reactions to discipline, based on Tom, and how he overcomes that to be a good dad.

But otherwise, if that never happens, they need to find something new and different with all of the Fisher-Baldwins. Much like Todd and the rape on OLTL, they keep going back to the same well with this family. And the best thing they can do is explore new storylines, create new iconic moments in their lives for the future... instead of going back. I think it would do wonders for all the characters.

Like MarkH, I find great enjoyment in all of them. We may be in the minority, but I think shining a new light on each of them individually will help a great deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I see it from a totally different perspective. I think her choosing her over the top expressions, makes the character more understandable. Picture a non-campy actor in this extremely campy character? Gloria stands out the most in the Fisher-Baldwin clan because she is almost used as the root of all their evils. I feels as if the show laid the foundation for what was the Fisher-Baldwin villains in Gloria's lap, I don't know if the actress made any of her choices based on this but I think the camp and over the top nature of the role goes along long way in helping the true evilous nature of the character. I think this is what helps the character stay on canvas, just my take

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought Rachel Kimsey was adorable and full of personality. Not like the previous two Macs. CF seems like a sweet girl -- but geez, her lack of personality is painful to watch. I'm wondering if this is the way she's being told to play the part -- too bad because it's reflecting poorly on her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You said a mouthful there, though I didn't really care for her from Raul on. Raul belonged with Rianna. Period.

:lol: I adored that.

And all I gotta say is- MAN, that Sharon Case is giving one hell of a performance. She injects nuance into every word that Sharon breathes. I've always liked Case, but never have I been this mesmerized by her. My eyes are glued to her in every scene she's in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know eh? I always appreciated her too, but she has taken her work to a whole other level here. This is the type of storyline that some people wait their entire careers to play. It just screams emmy. I also think it really adds depth to the character of Sharon as well. Who knew after 15 years there could be such unexplored territory here that compliments the character and doesn't destroy her... like other soaps when they try to change up a long standing character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Junior and Adam, WORD to every. single. thing. that you said! I've always enjoyed Sharon, and her tendency to self-medicate with sex, but I have never, never, seen this type of brilliancy with the character as I see now! Exquisite character writing, and great performances by Sharon. I, too, just am glued on the screen whenever she comes on. She is LOVE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
    • That would have made sense. Did all these characters get dropped when DePriest left or had they already been dropped?
    • The other issue with Missy: in June 2020, she "liked" some social media posts by Candace Owens -- things Candace said that were against Black Lives Matter.  That is described here https://tvline.com/news/melissa-reeves-racism-days-of-our-lives-instagram-controversy-2894568/ I don't know if that was ever resolved.
    • She appeared onscreen not long after Rose Livingston and Sara Montaigne, and we found out that Sara was Rose's estranged daughter. I wonder whether Peggy might have been part of that family group -- or else they were just juggling a few different potential mysteries so that they could develop whatever seemed to be getting the best response from the audience. They didn't do anything much with Rose and Sara really either. Maybe Rose would have become more prominent if Rachel and Mac had split up over Mitch, or if Sara had really flourished. In some ways I can picture Cheryl being affected by MJ's prostitution similarly to how Josie was distressed by finding out about Sharlene. But I can also see that Josie as a Frame being involved with Matthew would have different stakes for Rachel and Sharlene than Cheryl being involved with Scott. I do think the solution for Cheryl would have had to be a badder boy than Scott -- either a real bad boy who would do her wrong, or the kind of bad boy (not Chad!!!) who is essentially misunderstood and other people just don't understand. Cheryl would also have been better off with some friends her own age. Matthew and Josie benefited a bit from having other teenagers to interact with.
    • Sally Spencer was a decent actress, but the writing destroyed the "M.J." that Kathleen Layman had built. Layman had a quiet strength about her, and she and Osburn really felt like sisters. Spencer's character should have been either an unmentioned sister, or maybe Jake's that grew up close to Kathleen, M.J. and the rest, but was away for a few years before joining the force. Kristen Marie was o.k., but I always got a mousier vibe from her. Being pigeon-holed with Scott for most of the run hurt things for her, as well.  The Loves were also underserved between Rhonda Lewin and Philece Sampler. Philece would have been better as Nicole. Thank goodness Anne Heche  showed up for the next round of auditions. Christopher Holder was mediocre as Peter, but given a shot, I think Marcus Smythe could have stuck around for a while.  I would have had Peggy Lazarus be a Frame -- possibly an ex-wife for Vince with an agenda. Smythe and Hollen had  a fun chemistry that could have kept the two around.. Bringing recasts for  Cheryl and Ben back mixing it up with other Frames. Corys, Lawrences at the time might have kept all the families stronger. 
    • shoot...he said in that Locher room with Krista. I think he met her before that---she was doing Broadway and they had mutual friends or an agent maybe?
    • Yes. And I assume he met Mary Ellen Stuart at GL.
    • That's an odd coincidence. Yeah, Roger would turn anything he could to his advantage. At the time, he's just taking the pictures to bank leverage over Reva, Billy or the Lewises.  I'm kinda squeamish about 1986 episodes myself. I'd love to hear the original version of Ross/Vanessa/Dinah, but the Cain story is bad, and I don't want Billy and Vanessa to break up.
    • Eeek. I didn't know this either! I will say, though, even though they skimmed over a lot of Roger's past, I will give them props for not trying to turn him into a hero. Yeah, I was hoping we would get more 1986 episodes than were available on YT before, but now I'm wondering if I really want to see that. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy