Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Speaking of odd language, can the Jan 6 committee (and all government entities) stop using the term "gentlewoman"?  Given that it is derived from gentleman it doesn't make it seem as politically correct as intended.  Perhaps they could just refer to all members as the "elected official" from where ever?  It has the same number of syllables and it is much more gender neutral. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6817

  • DRW50

    5989

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3461

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

I feel the same. While I believe the heart and mind are in the right place, I think the 'pregnant people' messaging is going to be a problem for a general public that just isn't there yet. There are better ways to lay these identity and rights issues out than to lean directly into frames like the ones Hawley sets out beforehand, especially when meanwhile you have publications like the NYT leaning into op-eds playing devil's advocate for anti-trans/LGBT stuff complaining about this language, trying to set women against transwomen or transmen. There has to be a more unifying frame. But I also can't blame trans people for not giving a fùck about that right now, when they're becoming Public Enemy #1 with the rest of us next.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, I know. We're talking like what? .02% of the human population as a whole?  I just do an eye-roll because I feel like it's always being brought up around election year. After that, it goes away for about two years and then it comes back up again. To me, it's a constant cycle. To this day since 2016, I don't talk to my older sister because of her ignorant Facebook memes towards the trans community. And the more I have discovered her past actions, the more I realize what a disgusting human being she is with an ugly heart, and I refuse to talk to her. I still talk to my nieces, but her name doesn't come up during phone conversations.

I cannot stand hateful rhetoric towards marginalized groups of people and I'm very vocal about that. I don't care if it's family.

Edited by Noel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Unfortunately they can't.

I get why it chafes but that's the standard designation for women in the House. These hearings are historic and the term will matter in transcripts.

Notice how the Senate doesn't have this issue. Men and women are both called "Senator." But that won't work for House members in red or purple districts.

This.

Also this.

(I still can't get used to us agreeing. 

Please register in order to view this content

)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Don't worry, we can keep arguing about the WH response! But in seriousness, however we differ on the particulars of the next steps I think we're all just trying to get through the days right now and process it in our own way, I don't have the stomach for much else. Between Dobbs and the J6 hearings it's been a very hard time for my mother. She had some very difficult experiences with abortion well before Roe was law, and she's also never really has gotten over watching her former workplace under siege live on television.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes! When I lived in Tampa I had a trans woman friend. She was pre-op and about 6'3.  We ended going through the drive thru at McDonald's one night. I was the one ordering and I felt such a cold, hard wall of hate from the order taker. It was palpable. 

At first I just thought it was a black/white thing.  I was so used to Jackie I didn't even think it could be about her. Then I saw the cashier look over at her with such disgust and she did not try to hide it at all. It has to be awful to deal with that kind of random hardcore hate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It just feels like such a cruel use of "culture wars" to distract from the congressional hearings, in order to not have the people who were so easily mislead by conservative social media for the past decade realize how often they've been conned into voting against their own civil and economic interests.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know people get defensive about collegiate snobbery, but it is hard not to notice the effect of education (and gender) on opinions about Trump from today's NYT polling when almost twice as many people who didn't complete a university degree still believe Trump's big lie.

 

Please register in order to view this content

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The next Jan.6 hearing is to be on July 21.

According to NBC, it is "expected to air in primetime."
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/jan-6-committee-expected-hold-hearing-july-21-prime-time-rcna37943

WASHINGTON — The next Jan. 6 committee hearing will be July 21 during prime time, according to three sources familiar with the planning.

The hearing will be the eighth in a series that started in early June.

The committee's chairman, Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., declined to say after Tuesday's hearing whether next week's hearing would be the last of its investigation. He said it would be “the last one — at this point.”

-------------
Other news sources seem to be all citing NBC on the primetime.

It's not (yet) up on the committee scheduling site:
https://www.congress.gov/committee-schedule/weekly/2022/07/18

----------

UPDATE, it's now confirmed for Thurs July 21
at 8:00pm EDT
https://www.congress.gov/committee-schedule/daily/2022/07/21

 

----------------
Preview of July 21 hearing (from GMA3 interview of July 14, 2022)
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/jan-committee-member-previews-hearing/story?id=86743927

Rep. Elaine Luria, a member of the House's Jan. 6 committee who will be co-leading its next scheduled hearing, spoke to "GMA 3" Wednesday to give a preview of what's to come.

The Virginia Democrat and Navy veteran, who will be co-leading the July 21 hearing with Rep. Adam Kinzinger R-Ill., said that Americans can expect the most detailed timeline of the Capitol riot.

"Mr. Kinzinger and I plan to go through that 187 minutes. What happened between the time that [former President Donald Trump] left the stage, gave these inflammatory remarks and gave people the impression...that he was going to himself march with this crowd to the Capitol," Luria told "GMA 3."

"[And] what happened between that moment and then around 4:17 in the afternoon, which is about 187 minutes later, when he finally made a statement to the nation, to the people at the Capitol to go home."

The congresswoman said that the evidence shows that Trump wasn't emphatic in his call to the rioters to stop the violence and leave the capital.

"He didn't take the leadership role as the President of the United States, as the Commander in Chief. We're going to talk about dereliction of duty," she said.

Luria said she and Kinzinger, who is also a veteran, take that role of duty seriously. The congresswoman served two decades in the Navy, retiring at the rank of Commander before she was elected in 2018 to the House.

She is the House Democratic Caucus member with the longest active duty military record and is the vice chair of the House Armed Services Committee and a member of the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs.

"I think that while serving in uniform, I felt like the threat was clear...to protect our country, our homeland," Luria said. "But to see something come from within that is such a threat, it's really disheartening. It gives me a fear about the future of our country."

The eighth hearing is expected to be "the last one at this point," according to committee co-chair Bennie Thompson, D-Miss.

-

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Manchin was always going to do this, and any senator, official, aide or advisor who seriously thought differently at this point needs their head examined.

Manchin is like Michael Biehn said in The Terminator: "It's what he does! It's all he does!" Negotiating with him in earnest and hoping for good faith is completely pointless.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • OIC Thanks. I saw thzt & looked for a prior  ... never mind. 
    • I imagine Brad will blow through all the money in a year and come crawling back, just as Portia warned him not to.
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • That's a name I haven't heard in a minute. Thanks! 
    • Well, since I'm still up unexpected past my growing-into-it bedtime. lol.   I finally got to rewatch Monday's. I even rewatched Friday's to take it all in. Now that we got the reveal and hit the climax of the SilkPress Sheila storyline, now we get to watch the aftermath and/or turns that come with its climax. So far, so good. Friday left us with three cliffhangers. And what I found surprising was how I felt about them over a rewatch.    I know some of you all felt a way about the dialogue during Kat vs Eva. I remember liking it more the first time around and it was nice for them to have these scenes to establish more of a frenemy vibe for them going forward. That still held up. But I found myself agreeing with you all about that dialogue. lol. Still, it was nice to have both of their POVs.   Second up was Silk Press Sheila vs the Duprees. And I was happy to get a brief spat with Dani in there. But the rest standouts for me was Anita and Martin. Haters can hate and given the tail end of the episode, I will agree to a fault, but Brandon has impressed and he was on fire on Monday and had great subtle work on Friday. And that subtle work made it all the better. Like I believe I said when I was watching...BC has a much better grip on his character and seems to be realizing what his tics are so has started to be able to know when to turn it up and when to dial it down. And for the most part (emphasis on most), he got that. Meanwhile, TT was giving fierceness, and I was here for every minute of it. Her reading SilkPress. Her being quip about it. Her 'BE STILL.' Ooooo she had a chokehold on me as Anita gave what I was expecting her to SilkPress. WORTH THE WAIT. I also loved Vernon's CHOOSE SILENCE. I wonder though if SilkPress will figure out Martin's condition from her observing Anita and Vernon with him.   And speaking of worth it...Oooo YES Nicole vs Ted was worth totally worth it. Oooooo I knew DD would nail it, and it was all so well done. The fight between the part of Nicole who is a therapist vs Nicole as a woman who wants to express how she feels. And being so angry. And how there would be moments when it would shoot out of her. And how she would restrain herself. But how she felt she should not be restrain. Just the levels of processing and layers. And DD played it all so well. I do wish Maurice gave just a little bit more, but overall, I thought he did a good job even if it was just Ted coming across as a deadbeat and not at all redeemable. And Kat being there for her mother was so beautiful.   Minority, but I love the montage though yes, it did run a little long. Given how the Duprees like to bond (and also as I mentioned from my own very recent family experiences), it did not seem out of place to me.     That said...let's see how the aftermath worked in today's episode. Overall. Cuz RC can be hit or miss. 
    • I wonder whose brilliant (

      Please register in order to view this content

      ) idea it was to do an almost complete rip-off of the "who killed Tom King"-storyline. That's some quality style writing right there.....  
    • The show is done. It got canceled at the end of January. https://www.soapoperanetwork.com/2025/02/fox-first-run-cancels-dish-nation-person-place-or-thing-pictionary-759232
    • I believe it. ESPECIALLY that last one. 
    • Aristotle Dumas. Just thought I'd throw that out there!  
    • Lol is that like an AI type of thing that popped up?

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy