Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Things are certainly going to get worse before they get better. Seems like Putin now wants to burn Ukraine to the ground out of frustration. While no one wants a direct war with Putin, I wonder how long the west will sit by and watch Ukrainian cities be sieged and carpet bombed for weeks on end. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6817

  • DRW50

    5991

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3465

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

I know people tend to hate any comparison to Hitler, but towards the end Hitler also destroyed the country he claimed to love - his own. Much of the rubble seen across Germany then was done by the Germans.

I can't help think about Syria and how the world stood by while Aleppo was turned to ruins, as the Russians killed civilians and crushed hospitals and homes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

To think that in my lifetime, I saw both the fall of the Berlin Wall and the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

Life comes at you fast, folks.

 

I've said it before, and I'll say it again: Putin has turned back the clock.  It's 1984 all over again.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Whatever happens I hope and pray that Zelensky comes out of it alive so he can continue to be a leader for the Ukrainians. He has really risen to the occasion.

Please register in order to view this content

A standing ovation is nice and all, but I wish that we could give Ukraine something a little more substantial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I read this whole thread.  The tweeter says he's describing millennial progressives.

All I can say is that I'm liberal? Left? progressive? (not sure of the modern label) and my friends of various ages who think like me ... are not isolationists.  Everything that happens in the world affects everything else, even if you've never met the people.  I mean, that's common sense, isn't it?  Shouldn't it be normal human compassion?

I love Obama but it was obvious we should have done something for Syria.  The people of Syria were asking for help.

Maybe I don't understand the label "progressive" ?

I grew up in the 1960s with a larger worldview.  I don't know how you'd label me? In the old days I'd be called left-wing, but in this whole SON politics thread it sound like leftwing means something different now than it did 50 years ago.

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There's a difference between being an imperialist interventionist who thinks you know what's best for another country..
.... and being someone who genuinely cares and *listens* to the people of the country you want to help.

Sanctions against apartheid South Africa worked - because the people of South Africa wanted the rest of the world to boycott the apartheid South Africa government. 

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Here's how I define the difference between progressive and liberal.

The current incarnation of progressivism is focused on economic populism. Every policy position is about how they don't want to pay their bills. (See: cancel student debt.)

Liberals are focused on civil rights. Issues like reproductive rights, LGBTQ issues, police reform, etc...

Just as a disclaimer and for context, I consider myself a liberal not a progressive. I'm a pragmatic, liberal Democrat and I believe in the credo of the Congressional Black Caucus.

"We have no permanent friends, no permanent enemies—just permanent interests."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think both sets of interests are more intertwined than the former Bernie wing would like to pretend they are - where they prefer to focus on economics because actually talking about social issues and/or Russia makes the white guys often at the center of the movement uncomfortable - but I am generally with marceline on these things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • She needs to learn to be honest with her husband about her lusty interests because being sex positive only works if you're not cheating on your spouse.
    • https://x.com/JermaineRivers/status/1922782226317529409       https://x.com/JermaineRivers/status/1931204864136396907
    • Very disappointed in the writers in the way they are screwing with Nicole, Ted,  and Kat to make Leslie remain viable. So many holes everywhere.
    • Somebody brought this up elsewhere which emphasizes why this NuTed appears as such a weakling. Why is Kat doing what HE should be doing? And that's everything he can to rid him and his family of this crazy woman. Kat is doing all kinds of things she shouldn't do but now I understand her more. She can't count on her father to eliminate this woman because he's a wimp. He's been too busy inviting her into his home and serving her drinks and offering her invitations to birthday parties. WIMP!!!!
    • It's Men's Mental Health Month.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • This is (maybe) overly simplistic and nonsoapy, but Doug needs to go to Gamblers Anonymous, to deal with the addictive neurological excitement hits that gambling gives him - and which control his life. Vanessa needs to go to therapy to find ways to remain healthfully lusty and sex-positive, but to stay away from anyone who would demean her.
    • YT keeps commending GL clips to me. I discovered Kathleen Cullen was on in Christmas 1987. Was there any talk of making it permanent  or was this just a special visit? I wish they had made the visit permanent. I liked her chemistry with Grant Aleksander.  
    • I'm not sure it's as unpopular as you think.  I just think the show knew they were in a bind, and needed a proven couple for the viewers to invest in. Trying to reunite Vanessa and Ross had just failed in 87. I don't think Ed and Holly's affair was well received, as Simon and Garrett had a brother/sister chemistry. Enter Billy and Vanessa, who give you history and an out not to try and do a Josh/Reva/Billy triangle, which would've really wrecked the relationship between Josh and Billy. I'd have been ok with trying Vanessa/Ross again, and doing a Vanessa/Ross/Holly/Billy quad for a while. I hated Nadine. HATED. She had to be the most insufferable also-ran before ATWT's Julia Lindsay. This is where I wish I knew Roger's history better.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • GROSS. Michael Swan was hot back in his ATWT days. Now he's 76 and WAY past his hot years.    
    • Since she kidnapped, locked up and tried to kill her father's wife I'd say that is still a pretty big deal
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy