Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6820

  • DRW50

    5995

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3466

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Disgusting although I was more surprised that Japan voted against it.  I guess I always thought of them as being more civilized than we are.  I wonder why we voted this way? In support of Saudi Arabia? I wish the article more analysis.

Edited by Juliajms
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

SMDH.

 

Again: SMMFH.

 

Don't you know?  It's because, in THIS country, we regard homosexuals as being no better than pedophiles.  Lock up your children, America!  Before The Gays snatch 'em and brainwash 'em with their godlessness and their man-on-man sex!

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Oh, I'm sure we worked out some sort of backroom deal with the Saudi Arabians.  Something like...we vote the same as they do, and in turn, Trump gets to build another gaudy, phallic shrine to himself overseas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Saudi Arabia and our coziness is public  example number 1 of US chastising anyone violating human rights is total hypocrisy. They execute homosexuals in SA so of course why would the US condemn it. Plus our own LGBT policies.

 

 

 

Next Topic

Thoughts? I wonder why this guy is being categorized as a populist?

 

https://theintercept.com/2017/10/03/populists-are-on-the-march-in-the-south-bernie-backed-insurgent-randall-woodfin-defeats-birminghams-incumbent-mayor/?comments=1#comments

Edited by JaneAusten
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Suppose the homophobes are correct and homosexuality is a psychological disease like, say, bipolar disorder.  If that were true, then wouldn't it be more prudent to treat the disease (which practitioners of that abominable "conversion therapy" say they are doing) than to execute or even incarcerate those afflicted?  You wouldn't put to death or lock up someone who was bipolar JUST for being bipolar, would you?  Even if their disorder led to their committing criminal acts, you might confine them for a period of time at facility, but you'd also seek treatment for them (drugs, therapy, a combination of the two).  You might even declare them "not guilty due to diminished guilty or defect" and then rehabilitate them.  So why, then, are gays and bisexuals criminalized and stigmatized for behavior that, by the homophobes' own implications, they couldn't help?

 

Anyway, I'm just thinking out loud.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Except those same people really don't care about treating the mentally ill. They gut any funding and services available so yeah not or never have bought this. They only use the mental illness label to justify mass shootings by white men and then do nothing in terms of mental illness health reform.

 

 

NEXT

So interesting article on the gerrymandering case being take up by the Supreme Court. Gorsuch is even a bigger grandstander than Scalia but it's refreshing to see Ruth Ginsburg slap this fool back into silence. And the reports on this yesterday is encouraging as Kennedy's questions in particular seemed to lead to the gerrymandering from his position possibly being a violation of the first amendment. But of course no decision. At the end of the day it would be great to see this lead to what Schwarzenegger did in California.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/ginsburg-slaps-gorsuch

 

 

NEXT

the ACLU is taking the case of a Hawaii doctor suing the FDA so that women are allowed to get the abortion pill from pharmacies. 

https://www.buzzfeed.com/emaoconnor/the-aclu-is-suing-the-fda-to-let-women-get-the-abortion?utm_term=.ej8nGOZ1D&bftwnews#.nwL82GyZ3

Edited by JaneAusten
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • We all knew that TT is busy so if she's off screen for a bit except for phone calls and/or visits.. then it is what is. Ashley was nicely used as support... which the writers should have been doing since day 1 so that viewers could understand why exactly she's on the show LOL Chelsea/Madison.... seems too good to be true... we shall see. Shanice as a PT... if it means more airtime.. I'm good.
    • Yeah, he's a mobster with Vanessa while his wife cozies up to mobsters as the worst mayor in America. 
    • He's too busy in Maryland with a younger blonde woman. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • The rumor Zimmer writes about sounds like something Paul Rauch would have told Zimmer about Jacqueline Courtney as a way to discredit Courtney as Rauch loved to do that sort of thing. Zimmer probably just retroactively fit it into her story. Zimmer does not have good sense of time in her memoir. Who knows?!!? Zimmer strikes me as someone who always has to be competing with women.  Zimmer and 1986: If I had no context and someone told me that someone in the 1986 scenes would win four Emmys, I would immediately pick Denniston. Granted, I've only watched about a week's worth, but my word, Zimmer just fades into the background even when she's the main player in the storyline. There's no life in her performances. It feels that Zimmer is unhappy and that she's letting it impact her acting. 
    • I'm dreading going into the ninth season; I've got to be mentally ready for it. 

      Please register in order to view this content

       Does not help these seasons are damn near thirty episodes. Twenty-two should've been their cut-off.
    • True. I did enjoy the episodes surrounding Greg's faux death, too. @Liberty City Agreed, it started pretty slow, but once Jill falls off the cliff, I was more invested for some reason. Yes, I genuinely enjoyed the episodes surrounding Greg's fake death. I agree, it began quite slowly, but once Jill fell off the cliff, I became much more invested for some reason. I guess bc more of the cast was working together.  
    • Shouldn't Laura talk to Kevin first before agreeing to her brother Martin moving in with them? Her house is like a hotel for people she never sees -- like Lucky, who she's unaware of his latest departure as a man who runs away from everything. Meanwhile, Lucky is busy giving away his cabin to Isaiah, who we've barely seen him with.
    • With Sean Kanan as Carl Ivati.
    • These episodes have been delightful so far. I enjoyed everyone who stood at the podium today, as it reminded me of all the decades of history.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy