Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6817

  • DRW50

    5991

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3465

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

 

It's not the fault of Democrats that this country is full of racists, sexists, and people who are happy to embrace authoritarianism. It's time for people to realize that the electorate is the problem. There isn't some magic formula that Democrats have to use that will reverse what these people want for this country. A lot of people in this country want a white nationalist country and want authoritarianism. They don't want democracy. The don't want to share this country with the rest of us. That isn't about Democratic messaging it's about the electorate. Blaming Democrats for "letting it get this close" is just another way of trying to fool ourselves. Millions of people in this country hate us and would happily kill us all if they could get away with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Well, for starters, it'd be nice if the Democratic Party were to renounce not just the far-left progressive types who arose in the wake of Bernie's so-called revolution and co-opted our party for their own grift, but strike any and all elements of their pie-in-the-sky agenda from our platform as well.  The right and far-right insist that we are hellbent on turning this country into a socialist nation -- which is so not true, but hard to argue down when we keep setting places for, say, AOC and the rest of the "squad" at our table.  I mean, right here in Oklahoma, all Stephanie Bice had to do was say Kendra Horn was BFF's with AOC (and with Nancy Pelosi, another highly-profiled Democrat who might be doing us more harm than good the longer she stays near the front of the line) and it was lights out for the first Democratic senator my state has had since God knows when.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

We did. That's what happened when we nominated Biden. When Biden kept saying "I beat the socialist" that's what he was doing. The Berners are losing their minds today because the truth is they wanted us to lose. BTW, when people talk about Trump getting more votes now that he did in 2016 don't discount how many of those might've come from far-lefties wanting revenge for being rejected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This.  I'm a Democrat but I could not take the Bernsters.  I'm sorry, but I paid for my college tuition by working and scholarships.  I know if I take out a loan, I have to pay it back and I did.  I know people who sent their kids off to college to places they really really could not afford.  That is not my responsibility to come with a bailout plan.  It's a debt.  Pay it back.  These pie in the skies ideas of his to have "free" college were never going to happen.  How many years did it take to get a national healthcare plan and now the Right is bent on dismantling it.  No way we're going to have free college.  And I've gotten into arguments with WAY far Left people who say - well, the more EDUCATION that people get the more likely they're going to be DEMOCRAT!  I'm like, UH.  I get the reasoning, but not really.  I know plenty of Republicans who were very well educated and are racist, dumb, and can't find the United States on a map and think Obama was born in Kenya.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

If that's so, then why do you have people on the right who keep insisting that he (and Kamala) are socialists, no matter how much or how often we keep insisting they're not?  Because, we aren't doing enough (IMO) to repudiate the far-left.  We keep letting them inside, in the name of bringing everyone under the same tent, instead of barring the [!@#$%^&*] doors against them.  We need to make it clear, or clearer, that their brand of progressive activism has no place in EITHER party, or we're gonna keep having close elections with razor-thin margins such as this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Leftists are right about a few things, one of them being that it doesn't matter how moderate a Democrat claims to be, many will still see them as a socialist. That doesn't mean I think Bernie was a better choice than Biden (I think Biden was one of the very, very, very few Democrats who could have won against Trump [if he wins]), but in places like Staten Island, Oklahoma, South Carolina, rural districts of Minnesota, etc. it wouldn't have mattered if Zombie Reagan was the House Speaker. There are some places that were going to be difficult to hold in an election year, especially against a figure like Trump who is beloved by many in these areas. I do think House Democrats bought into their own polling too much and got too overconfident, which, again, Biden's campaign people never did. 

 

Another thing I find myself agreeing with more and more with some on the left about is the establishment Democrats who are addicted to being in tears over how powerless they are. I cringed all the way through a long tweet thread a little while ago with Paul Krugman basically going on about how Biden winning was meaningless. So many people sacrificed their money, their time, their mental health, and potentially their lives to make this happen. That type of talk, especially from privileged people, makes me just say kiss my ass. 

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's far from meaningless when you remember what Biden can and will do about ICE and those children in cages on Day One. Day. One. So yeah, agreed, folks can miss me with that talk.

 

But I think AOC's clip above from last year is the core of the issue and always has been. And she's right, and I've said it before: The work is ahead of us, and it always was.

 

Meanwhile, in the bunker:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

We can't control what the right calls us. We can only keep pointing out that it's not true. The problem is that the left keeps sabotaging us and the right will always use that. You can't keep blaming our side for the fact that Republicans want to kill us and that the socialists want to help them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

AOC is not here to help. She's here to sabotage. She talks a good game but she will ALWAYS do what is most harmful to the Democratic party. That's her default setting. She doesn't really want to do her job. She just likes the spotlight. Frankly I'm looking forward to when she loses her district.

 

That said, it did hit me today that now we can get those kids out of cages. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I love my girl, but nope he's pathetic. 250K and now he's put her business at risk.   L O S E R    

      Please register in order to view this content

    • The whole town gushing over John Black as if he was a saint is eye rolling.  I guess death really colors people's memories over his many flaws, but I guess that is normal and human nature. I'm still confused as to why Leo hasn't been written out.  The actor stank up two soaps with his sub par acting, what does he have on TPTB's to remain on these soaps.   What's the point of Cat?  I hope the new head-writers figure out her purpose and develop her character. And I much prefer scenes not focusing on John's death because life does go on for the world when someone passes.  
    • Wasn't there a break in Zaslow's first run? I thought Roger was off-screen for a while, and when Zas came back, Roger was hiding at the boarding house and Nola figured out there was something hinkey about him. I'm pretty sure Simon chose to leave the first time and was replaced by RVV. I don't want to assume Jordan's issues played a role in his first departure, but Maeve said in an interview that at some point, it became very hard for her to work with him and she asked to work with him less. That seems to fit 1986, where suddenly Vanessa is essentially Ross' law clerk and not at every Lewis family moment.
    • He needs to divorce her arse with her constant cheating.   She's no better than Doug... she's F*cking pathetic.
    • I didn't know of any interruptions for Maeve Kinkead after her 1997 return. Her runs would then be 1981-1987, 1989-1996, 1997-2000, short arcs until the end. I knew Maureen Garrett second run was interrupted from a 2009 interview but I couldn't recall the exact year. Her runs would then be 1976-1980, 1988-2000, short arcs until the end.
    • As I said in May, I have no problem with Martin and Bradley being married. You can still do all the fun introloper storylines with them as you do everyone else. Both men of a certain age, and it is very believable for them to have either a first love or have been previously married. And, you can do it without either of them cheating!  

      Please register in order to view this content

       I said something similar during the premiere week. Bill was the perfect age to play Martin as Vernon and Anita's child. I would've much preferred this version, but oh well.
    • I don't know how you want to count Maeve. She "retired" in '00, but would come back for appearances. I don't know however if she made an appearance in '01 or '03. In '02 I believe she came back for Josh and Reva's wedding. I assume she came back when Gina Tognoni took over the role of Dinah. And I know she was back for Ross' memorial service. Maureen Garrett was around until at least '00. I don't think Holly was in town when Ben returned though. I just got pissed off about Jerry all over again.
    • So, pretty sure Zaslow, Garrett, Kinkead, and Newman all chose to leave the first time. (If that's wrong, please correct me). Bernau - not sure why he left the first time. Was it voluntary? Or did they decide to write him out? They were writing so many out during that time period. It always seemed odd to me that they introduced Alex, FINALLY giving him someone he could talk to, and then he was written out. Or maybe that's why they made Alex his sister, so she could take his place as the head of the Spaulding family? Would love more intel on that if anyone knows. Simon - was he replaced by RVV? Or did he voluntarily leave the first time? It seems to me like one of those times TPTB decided to sex up or glamorize a character (and it clearly flopped). If he was fired, interesting he came back. Again, would love if someone could spill the tea. Clarke - I've always assumed he left because of his personal issues, but not sure if that was the case the first time.
    • So Doug just leaves Vanessa there with Joey? He's a f*cking loser. Vanessa needs to divorce his arse 
    • Tina Sloan tied Jerry VerDorn record when Guiding Light was cancelled - 26 years uninterrupted 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy