Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Weigel's tweet interests me mostly because I'm pretty sure this is exactly what that phony Bloomberg is likely going to do. And the media will lap it up, as they spent years trying to make him happen (remember when he was going to run in 2012, or 2016, or when he was going to stop national gun violence?).

 

I'm not a woman so I have no room to speak about how they will vote, but in this case I do wonder how much of the Trump female vote is already locked in due to what he did in 2016. You knew what you were getting with him, to say the least, in terms of misogyny and harassment of women.

 

If he loses some of the female vote I think it will be on economic issues, or maybe, to a lesser degree, social issues. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6819

  • DRW50

    5993

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3466

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

 

I feel the same way.  As the saying goes, the fix is in.

 

No offense to any white women here, but I don't give a damn what y'all are gonna do in the midterms.  You made it clear whose side you were on when the majority of you chose Trump.  Ergo, I say, concentrate on getting more POC to bring the votes, along with independents who might sway to the left, or people who, like myself, chose to sit out the last election for whatever, foolish reasons.

 

ESPECIALLY go after folks like me, because, if 2016 taught us anything, it's that we can't count on white men or women anymore to do the choosing for us.

 

If Bloomberg ends up as the Democrats' candidate, then we might as well cede the next election to Trump.  Plain and simple.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I don't think he'll run as a Democrat. I think he'll run as a "third way" type to push this fantasy that many in the media have of some kind of dream party combining the GOP's fiscal conservatism with the Democrats' social liberalism. I remember when they got hot over this in 2016, only for it to go nowhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Chuck Grassley is reminding me that before he mostly became known for being a huge [!@#$%^&*] with too much power there used to be "fun" articles about his wacky social media adventures. Which apparently involve him tweeting like he's texting on the toilet.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The "liberal" Washington Post can't let the NYT outdo them. I know remember Kathleen Parker from her op-eds and her appearances on that PBS show To The Contrary, and she's always been a conservative.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/is-there-a-kavanaugh-doppelganger/2018/09/18/88418f52-bb86-11e8-a8aa-860695e7f3fc_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.f4e8ca3ece24

 

McConnell speaking to some loving, kind hearted, tolerant, right wing christians. I hate this man and it was a hard for me to listen to this without having some bad thoughts.

Please register in order to view this content

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

You're not alone.

 

I'm sure there are some women out there who come forward with "Mitch McConnell tried to force himself on me" stories...just as I'm sure every single one of those encounters ended with the woman-in-question collapsing into uncontrollable laughter over McConnell's clumsiness.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This should be disturbing to folks: Starting last year, the Afghan and U.S. governments started keeping the death tolls in Afghanistan a secret.  This NYT article posits that the death toll has only gone up since 2016.

 

The Death Toll for Afghan Forces Is Secret. Here’s Why.

 

"Seventeen years after the United States went to war in Afghanistan, the Taliban is gaining momentum, seizing territory, and killing Afghan security forces in record numbers."

 

"Last week was especially bad, with more than 400 killed, according to an account by diplomats. But even the average numbers in recent months — from 30 to 40 a day, according to senior Afghan officials — represent a substantial upswing from two years ago and appear unsustainable in a country that has been shattered by decades of war."

 

About 400 Afghan police and soldiers were killed last week, according to details leaked from a meeting between American diplomats.  400??!!!  

When questioned, apparently the diplomats said that they weren't talking literally but in terms of sacrifice. 

Edited by DramatistDreamer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

^^I saw that CNN video on social media and something told me not to post it here. 

It was just an instinct that I got and I searched the subtweets and saw that someone claimed to know a few of the women in the gathering and identified them as GOP operatives (they may have used another word instead of operatives, though).

I got a bad vibe after watching that video and ultimately decided not to post it here even before I had read about who some of who these women might be.

What terrible people these folks are!  Also, I'm glad I no longer subscribe to cable and that CNN gets none of my money and very little of my time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recent Posts

    •  Yeah, he is still dressed like Martin. He looks great, though.  Cute picture. Sober up, cause we need the tea.
    • Well, Claire did rig Rick's test results, but it was to flunk. They actually managed to get his correct results back after they were thrown into Cedar's furnace...I think? Everyone knew Claire changed them and Rick passed so that rewrite never made sense.   I agree. Pratt always seems "edgy" on screen (and her Locker Room interview prooved that it came from her personality.) I liked Claire causeing trouble and love Meta ringing her beads. Its just too bad that Abby left and they kinda just forgot Claire existed. 
    • Oh so they did sleep together. The retcon was just the medical boards? That makes sense. I think Susan Pratt, while a good actress, was just an unlikeable presence onscreen and soaps wrote to that most of the time. There was some potential for more with her when she returned in that stint, as Pratt was at least interesting to watch and caused some conflict for the stifled Bauers. Instead of pairing her with Alan and then disappearing I might have had her hook up with Danny. I think there was a lot of flirtation with Bolger's Philip, but they never crossed the line.
    • I haven't seen Melchior in the role, but it would be astounding if she's worse than Linn. Her rivalry with Stephanie was sidelined IMO because Linn was one of the few actors who didn't have chemistry with, nor raise her game, when paired with Susan Flannery. To be fair, she did show some signs of life in scenes opposite Darlene Connelly, but way too little too late. It feels like Bell finally woke up after the Thorne switchover and sidelined the Kristin character with Mick to 1 or 2 appearances a week. As a result, the show improved by leaps and bounds after she was inexplicably at the center of the show for most of 1989. Margo is so much more enjoyable when not tied to that albatross. Even Clarke is watchable with less Kristin interaction. She can't exit stage left soon enough. As for the new Thorne, I agree that Norcross feels like a Forrester a lot more than Thrachta, even if the latter is a better actor.
    • The cast said that scenes were filmed over a few weeks, with a preplanned hiatus in the middle, and it was all out of order.  I would *guess* that they used Chandler when they could get him? They also had to work around Leo Howard getting married around the time these episodes were filmed, but I guess they worked it out since Tate appeared.
    • Maybe there was a scheduling conflict or something. He still has the full time 9-5 in Atlanta, right? Julie was there. Idk if Maggie’s gonna be a part of it though 
    • At this point, the best nonpaywall coverage of Los Angeles (and anything political)  is in...the Tennessee Holler https://bsky.app/profile/thetnholler.bsky.social And as always, emptywheel continues to be consistent https://bsky.app/profile/emptywheel.bsky.social
    • Today Monday was the start of people arriving at the funeral, but the service hasn't started yet.  I know this is the nonspoiler thread but I think it's okay to say (in nonspecific terms) that the funeral episodes span a few days.  I won't detail it more here. Just sayin' keep watching.
    • Why am I only now hearing about what happened in L.A., lol?
    • While I agree that Reeves is Jennifer, I honestly do prefer Cady McClain in the role, as I feel she had/has a wider range of acting capabilities than I feel Reeves has. It's the strength of an actor, ultimately, for me, regardless of how I feel about Reeves' political/social views (which I widely disagree with). Plus, not to mention, they costumed Reeves like an old-fashioned frumpy farm/Moron wife, while McClain had some fashion-forward moments.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy