Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Soap Opera Network Community

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.
SON Community Back Online

Featured Replies

  • Member

I feel like Queen's "Another One Bites The Dust" should be the theme/anthem of this wreck of an administration.

Edited by Wendy

  • Replies 46.3k
  • Views 4.9m
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Member

I want to know how people like Maggie Haberman are any better than Michael Wolff who they all complain about. She's no better than he is. Her entire reporting on the white house is fluffing up Jared and Ivanka and making excuses for everything that goes on. At least Wolff's stuff seemed more accurate than her fluff.

  • Member
1 hour ago, DramatistDreamer said:

When the lying gets to be too much, I guess.

When the lying could send you to prison.

  • Member
37 minutes ago, JaneAusten said:

I want to know how people like Maggie Haberman are any better than Michael Wolff who they all complain about. She's no better than he is. Her entire reporting on the white house is fluffing up Jared and Ivanka and making excuses for everything that goes on. At least Wolff's stuff seemed more accurate than her fluff.

 

She's done some good work, but she's also completely amoral about keeping her access. I think she still mostly knows they're all crooks and awful on some level, but her access depends on placating them and defending their stories. She will push any PR line, like this claim that Hicks always meant to leave (after five months) to keep her conduit to the WH and then, like all key staff at the Times, Haberman will passive-aggressively attack any critics. She also was very upset about Wolff because let's face it - he scooped her and her upcoming book on Trump. IMO her relationship with Trump and his administration is now partly Stockholm Syndrome - she has gone partially native. She sympathizes with too many of them.


She still gets roasted during her passionate defenses over her stories, so that's good. IIRC her father is old school NY journalism and she used to work for one of the gossip rags, she got grandfathered in. Because of her family I think she is entirely too close to the city's society set and therefore Trump to have enough objectivity and awareness of how glib she really comes off.

Edited by Vee

  • Member

This is how she treated a very mild commentary from Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo:

 

 

Meanwhile, in The Adventures of Young Jared:

 

 

Edited by Vee

  • Member

Topical:

 

 

  • Member
  • Member

Bye bye:

 

 

  • Member
  • Member

The New York Times seems to be eternally confused about what they are supposed to be (or as some say, they just seem more confused because they are now called out by social media, which wasn't an issue until the last 5 or so years). I was reading this about their editorial page editor, James Bennet, who has gotten most of the attention for bumbles and stumbles this year. 

 

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/02/new-york-times-op-ed-crisis-james-bennet

 

The most recent (aside from Bret Stephens repeatedly Twitter bitching about people who criticize his cool kid friends at the paper...) flap involves the Times briefly hiring a woman with ties to a white supremacist.

 

https://splinternews.com/the-new-york-times-just-hired-and-maybe-unhired-a-na-1822978000

 

11 hours ago, DramatistDreamer said:

Too bad that approval ratings drop didn't happen in 2016 when Rubio was up for re-election.  I don't know why folks keep electing him. SMH.

 

A lot of Republicans benefited from it mostly being a good year for the party. They also nominated a flawed Democrat to run against him, and I think the Democrats were hobbled by him dropping out and then coming back in.

 

Media darling Marco has also benefited from a decade of gushing press. He was supposed to their hero. He was supposed to reach young people because he listened to Tupac. He was supposed to bring in more Hispanic voters. They were still gushing over him after he made half-hearted, obviously false promises at the town hall - oh he stood up so well to criticism, and so on.

 

They'll never fully give up on him, just as they never will on other forever friends (like McCain, Romney, "T-Paw," etc.) because it means they will lose face. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.