Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6816

  • DRW50

    5989

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3461

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Actually, I'm with Whoopi Goldberg, who once said (and as always, I am paraphrasing), "If you don't want these women to have abortions, then let's them have those babies and we'll drop them off at YOUR house."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A former health insurance CEO explains why repeal and replace is doomed.

 

http://www.businessinsider.com/obamacare-repeal-and-replace-wont-work-2016-12

 

Seriously. These ideologues are going to send us right back to the Great Depression which, ironically, happened the last time the GOP controlled all the branches of government.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Maybe.

 

I suspect Republicans believe poor people choose to stay poor.  (As if poverty were a choice, right?)  To them, it's unfathomable for someone who is born impoverished to remain that way so long as he "works hard."  After all, isn't the history of this country filled with stories of men (which is to say, men who are Caucasian, heteronormal and God-fearing) who pulled themselves up by their proverbial boot straps, with absolutely no help from anyone but the Good Lord Above?  (Actually, for many of those men, God was the LAST thing on their minds as they lied, cheated, stole and even killed in their quest for success.  But that's of no importance to anyone still paying attention.)

 

I'm not saying the quintessential rags-to-riches story can't happen anymore.  It can...but not for everyone.  In fact, it never could.

 

For every man who is born into poverty, works hard and achieves that Gatsby-esque American Dream, there's another man who is born under similiar circumstances, makes the same sacrifices; yet when he dies, he's still poor.  It isn't anything they did or didn't do that would explain why they "failed."  It's just the hand the life dealt them.

 

Yet, for some damn reason, congressional Republicans, and even many average people, can't (or won't) see that.  No, poor people in this country stay poor, because they're lazy, and because the rest of us make their meager existence too comfortable for them.  (As if living on stuff like food stamps and Medicaid is the epitome of "leisure class.")  Which is how we end up with jackholes like Paul Ryan, who can't understand why many who work in fast food (like he did) don't have the luxury of seeing the job as a stepping stone toward something better (again, like he did); and who believe that the answer to all our problems would be to restrict and/or do away with entitlements and subsidies.

 

And if taking away their social and economic safety nets means they fall even further behind...?  Well, then, they just...hafta roll up their sleeves and work a little harder.

 

Because, hard work never killed anyone, right?

 

Except...it has.

 

You can work hard all your life -- sometimes, around the clock -- just to make those ends meet, or at least move closer together; and in the end, all you have to show for it are a nice-looking corpse and a grave your loved ones visit on major holidays.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

And all because the GOP wanted to stick it to President Darkie.

 

Again, many see them as mere "stepping stones."  You're not supposed to make a career out of working at the Gap.  It's only there to give teenagers spending money and teach them the values of hard work and self-discipline.

 

Ah, but remember: Trump's "historic" and "landslide" victory gave Republicans on Capitol Hill a "mandate" to do that very thing.

 

Sure, we're all about to suffer, but at least part of me will get a big(ly) kick out of seeing complainers who THOUGHT TrumpCo. and Congress would replace the ACA with "something really fantastic" realize that, in fact, they got nothing.  Even the diehards who will stand by their man no matter what will twist themselves into yoga-like positions to justify why their own government has left them stranded like the Pharoah's slaves in the desert.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

When it comes to people think, this is true. But, it couldn't be further from the truth, because when I worked in retail I worked with several older people. I was trained by a 67 year old woman who could barely make ends meet. The stores here are full of 40+ people and I see very few teens. Retail is no longer the industry of teens wanting pocket change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Exactly but Khan's right. Whenever there's a discussion of raising the minimum wage conservatives say that you aren't supposed to be living on those jobs but that ignores that fact that some people have to. Republicans always approach problem solving by talking about how they think things should be instead of how they really are. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Deadline is reporting that Jake Schreier, who recently directed Thunderbolts* (a return to form quality-wise for the MCU IMO), is the frontrunner to direct the MCU X-Men reboot.  I thought he did an excellent job with Thunderbolts* - in a way, that seemed like an audition for the X-Men revolving around a group of misfit character that come together under a common goal. ‘X-Men’ Movie At Marvel Studios Circling ‘Thunderbolts*’ Director Jake Schreier To Assemble New Team – The Dish
    • Laura was at such a cool place by season 7. There were many exciting avenues to take the character, I wish they had explored the different dynamics within the friendship circle. Watching Karen and Laura have more conflict, with Laura becoming the advice giver to Val is something I always wanted.  And why wait until she dead until you bring on her mom? Yep. Yup. I didn't care for it.
    • Thanks.  Yes, I believe this is his first time with the BDWs.  Was O'Connor still listed with the BDWs?
    • The flow of each episode has been so much better
    • And her evolution was so subtly done. There was nothing like the depraved shows later on, like Game of Thrones, where they said a woman needed to be raped in order to find empowerment. The layers of Laura were what got me hooked on Knots, somewhere in the season 3 repeats. And I agree that her becoming a therapist would have made sense - look at how much her trauma over her mother drove her decisions early on.
    • I think that the problem with Laura was that she had grown to love herself and saw her value in both herself, her career, and her marriage.  She had this inner strength and confidence that Lynn/Bernard didn't know how to harness/write for because they were more interested in generating conflict amongst emotionally immature people. Karen/Mac and Gary/Val were all immature/stubborn to a fault even though they all had grown/evolved.  So the Latham's could key into their essence/history to generate the standard soap opera tropes and stories for them. Even the season 8 conflict with Laura's pregnancy and Greg not being cool with it didn't diminish Laura's fire and strength.  You saw how she was able to move on and live her life as a single mother because she'd already done that after Richard took off.   I saw her response to Greg's kissing Paige as 'that's my husband and I can't change him.. but once I find something better, I'll toss himself'.  She wasn't emotionally tied to him nor his money.. and I think that was partly why she was such a unique and interesting character in the nighttime soap world in the 80s.
    •   They actually had great chemistry to as friends in the scene I felt. A shame it was the first onscreen interaction. Looks better than Bill/Hayley’s house. I absolutely loved that! I feel the exact same way. This is just facts. Those scenes today between them were electric.
    • If The Real Housewives of Dubai is on hiatus/pause (a.k.a. done), then we need a way for Caroline Stanbury to come back to Ladies of London.
    • I hate quick snip scenes.  Such a tired hold-over from the 1980s.  And that nonsense does not belong on BTG.  Bring back the long scenes.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy