Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6816

  • DRW50

    5988

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3458

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

I've already said that the claims of the two women who settled with Cain (or more accurately, with the National Restaurant Association) should be taken very seriously. However, I'm pretty skeptical of the third--and now fourth--woman who all of a sudden popped up out of the woodwork and stated that she was sexually harassed by Cain. Why are they all of a sudden talking when they remained silent for all these years? Furthermore, why didn't these additional two women say something prior to the press reports about Cain's settlements (with the other two women), or say something back when Cain was a long-shot candidate?

Playing the race card is reprehensible whether conservatives or liberals do it.

Edited by Max
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Cain, along with the entire GOP candidate list, IMO, don't mind making fools out of themselves. I remember a few Dems who did it as well, but off the top of my head, I can't remember the last time a Democratic candidate was pushed by the CNM having so many flaws as these people do. Cain is the black Clinton. And even though he lied under oath (which I feel he should have never done), Cain seems to think in his arrogance that he will fore peole to stop talking about it.

And the ultra-right wing of the party is continuing to show where they are on race. It's no where close to where the majority of Americans (I assume) are at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Money can be that circumstance. But, seeing this man act like he is could be motivation enough. Although, when Alred attaches herself to someone, it's nothing about anything else but dollar signs. She just so happens to be right on some occasions (Schwarzenegger).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For some reason, I see any involvement by Gloria Allred a credibility-damaging event. I think most people don't think much of her or her tactics. Who pays this woman and, correct me if I'm wrong, but I can't recall a time when she championed a cause against a liberal. It's also interesting that she always pops up in cases where the accused is a conservative/Republican.

Are the polls indicating less support for Cain over these allegations? I haven't seen polls today... but yesterday's information indicated the public could care less about these accusations.

So, not much has been said here about the Occupy Wall Street protests/sit-ins/riots/whatever. I'm particularly interested in how my more left-leaning friends in the forum feel about the movement...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, even though I understand what you mean, Brian, liberal, conservative....no matter what, I find her an ambulance chaser against the rich and powerful. Now, if you decided to do whatever foul crap you are doing, then don't be surprised when your dirt comes out now. Cain deserves what he's going through, and now, there may be women coming out of the woodwork because of the way he handles himself. It's never what you do....

It's always the cover-up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The polls show Cain staying with Romney, even though Romney has now gained 5 points over him. Many who support Cain really don't care. Which says something about me when it comes to how much some of his supporters blame the women for what happen. As far as OWS and the other movements throughout the country, hell, right on if they can keep it going. The same thing happened with the civil rights movement. Sometimes people get so damn fed up that they feel they have to beat the streets and shout to the heavens about how they are being treated in their own country. The inequality is worse now than probably at any time in our nation's history. All these charletons we have sent to our Congresses better take heed.....we are mad as hell, and we're not going to take it anymore.

Love Network. One of my all-time favorite films.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's beyond hypocritical for Cain to attack his accusers for making unproven allegations of sexual harassment while he himself suggests that Perry supporters or liberal Democrats are responsible for leaking these stories (despite failing to provide solid evidence that this is the case).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Elections today - Kentucky's state officers such as governor, treasurer, AG - thanks to Steve Bashear (Dem incumbent) being popular, and David Williams running a disastrous campaign (his closing act has been criticizing Bashear for participating in a Hindu ceremony for a new business venture in KY, leading Williams to tell people to come to Jesus), it looks like Democrats will win most of these races.

Virginia - elections such as the house of delegates and the state senate. Republicans favored to win the senate and pad their majority in the house.

Ohio - repeal of widely hated governor Kasich's union-busting law, which went as far as to even bar cops or firefighters from having unions. Polls show the repeal will pass, but you never know. The union-busting law is favored by most of the Presidential candidates, aside from wishy-washy Romney, who was for it, sort of against it, and for it.

Mississippi - Personhood amendment on the ballot, which would likely ban abortion and birth control in the state. All major Presidential candidates in favor, including Mitt Romney. 50-50 chance of passing. I'd say it passes with about 54%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In NJ (which I'm surprised Carl forgot to mention), I fully expect the Democrats to retain their majorities in both houses of the state legislature.

If Republicans make legislative gains in VA (a crucial swing state), that's a bad sign to come for Obama in 2012.

A number of heavily partisan states have a governor from the minority party (or recently have had one); such victories (excluding re-election victories) are almost always flukes. In KY, a Democratic governor was elected in 2007 because his Republican precedessor was engulfed in a scandal.

Edited by Max
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I always forget they have off-year elections for NJ's legislature.

There's also a recall election in several states - one in Michigan, one in Arizona. The Arizona one is interesting mostly because it involves Russell Pearce, who wrote the anti-immigration law that helped rescue Gov. Jan Brewer from sure failure, and which became a national lightning rod. This is the last election before the new maps, which Brewer is trying to have done in the most partisan manner she can, to the point of impeaching the chairman of the redistricting commission (Arizona, at least before Brewer, was nonpartisan in their maps).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • In my usual account on my most used video hosting site with the video title  DAYS 1-8-15 Will & Paul Sex This is an edit I began when I was first teaching myself to edit & at that time I couldn't make it do what I wanted it to do. I pulled it up & finished it this morning. 
    • Or Megan is shot as retaliation for Dave's unpaid gambling debts...while Julie confesses she's the biological mother of Special Guest Star Barry Bostwick's little boy.
    • Finland seemed such an odd choice for a location shoot. ATWT went to Greece and later Spain while GL had Tenerife and there were others in that timeframe. But Finland not being a known tourist destination or offering the tropical/sunny atmosphere usually associated with location shoots seems off brand. Maybe they were negotiating a deal with a tourist association and it fell through.
    • I was talking about 1986, but the glimpses of 1982 are about the same. 
    • I skimmed some of the 1982 synopses; Steve was planning on an opening an office in Finland, and I think Jim went there as part of the preparation. That probably was a big issue; AW had already gone to San Diego that year, with Rachel/Steve/Mitch. And to upstate NY with Pete and Diana. I wonder if upstate was as expensive lol  AW in 1982 has always fascinated me, because of how messy it was 
    • That makes sense. What a messy time for the show. And any changes they made were mostly for the worse.
    • The transition from Neal to Adam was very abrupt, and to be honest my theory is that the character of Neal was designed so that we think he is super shady but then it turns out that he was on the side of good all along so Neal could have seamlessly become a hero of the BCPD with no need for Adam. I don't know whether Robert Lupone was hired on a short contract or if he was fired from a longer-term contract because they decided they wanted someone who was more of a leading man type, but I can imagine a scenario where Charles Grant did both the undercover Egyptian treasure/flirt with Victoria and the straighter-arrow day to day police investigation. But in my imagined scenario the MJ prostitution plotline probably doesn't exist and instead he probably continues a relationship with Victoria. The story seems very odd to me. I assume that David Canary would have been included only because a plotline where Steve is going to Finland in which only Rachel is seen in actual Finland seems unlikely. The synopses explicitly mention that Alice can't go with Steve but would whoever was playing Alice at that time have had the kind of clout to get the remote cancelled? It also strikes me as unlikely that production would have approved the expensive location shoot and *then* cancelled it only because of jealousy. It seems more likely that they rejected it because of the expense but then the jealousy part got added to the gossip speculatively, possibly because while it was being worked out they justified not including more castmembers because of the expense. 
    • My comment has nothing to do with cast resentment, but does relate to the Finland location shoot: It may be a coincidence, but Jim Matthews died in Finland in 1982.  Hugh Marlowe's final episode was in April 1982, but the character probably didn't die untll May or June. (I'm unable to find the character's date of death, only the date of Marlowe's final episode). SInce Jim and Rachel had very little interaction after around 1975, it is unlikely Jim's death in Finland had any connection to Rachel's potential visit, but the choice to have Jim die in that location at that time is a head-scratcher.  I'm sure the writers sent Jim on an extended trip (and off-screen) because of Marlowe's illness.  But Finland seems like a strange choice considering the (then) recently cancelled location shoot.  
    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy