Jump to content

Texas! Discussion Thread


Chris B

Recommended Posts

  • Members

This is the development story that I wanted.

AW had been through three failed expansions/spin-offs: Somerset, For Richer, for Poorer, and the 90-minute expansion.  So, why was it chosen, once again, as the source material? 

I wanted to know more context about the culture of daytime TV.  There's a fun detail that the opening party was unusually sumptuous.  So, it might have been fun to hear about the PR roll out.  Why did NBC decide to use another soap rather than a talk show or a game show?  There's no reason given why Texas was put into development.

I wonder if we are capricious? Did too many people complain that the Ryan's Hope book didn't contain enough story synopsis?  And now we are saying there was too much in this book?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 580
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

 A quick look: Gail Kobe, Paul Rauch, Harding Lemay, John Corrington, Judy Lewis, Robert Calhoun, and Beverlee McKinsey have died. From the Texas standpoint, Joyce Corrington is alive, but is she willing/able to talk and does she have memory of all of this considering she's 88? Pamela Long is the only one alive at this point and she has spoken about her time on the show. She also wouldn't know about the creation aspect stuff so we may never know about how the show came to be unless there are people on the AW side who are still alive. And who would they be?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If you haven't caught her Canadian CITY LIGHTS interview, you need to! So candid & her sense of humor on view.

Until last year I'd never seen even one episode of it but my mother was a huge fan & she could not stop laughing at that storyline. She laughed until she cried. And, this was a veteran of NBC soaps & not at all her usual reaction.

I've just barely made a dent in the book but I'm still excited. I waited for the kindle & I think I might have bought the first one.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

NBC daytime was in freefall following Lin Bolen's departure in Feb 76l

Madeleine David lasted a year as VP before Michael Brockman took over in 77.

Lovers and Friends seemed like a sure thing but was a disaster. The decision to take it off the air after 13 weeks  and retool branded For Richer For Poorer as a dud from the get go.

Days and The Doctors were struggling. The Pollocks departing TD and Bill Bell no longer involved at Days seemed to have an affect.

America Alive was a disaster.

There was a series of flop gameshows.

Whatever they had in development(if anything) was probably  dropped when Brockman arrived.

AW was their only top rating soap at that time but expanding and trying a spin off only damaged it.

Had AW stayed at 3pm that timeslot would have been safe and they could have tried a 30 min show at 2pm or 2.30 adjunct to TD with the option of expanding it if it worked or if TD seemed terminal.

Or Days could have moved to 1pm when L&F came along and L&F placed at 2 or 2.30.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I’m done reading the Texas book and ready to pass it on for free, if anyone wants it. It was good. I enjoyed reading it because I watched the show. Like others have said, I wish it had gotten more in depth of the problems that made the show fail. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Couldn't have hurt.

Alex and Iris was supposed to be a sweeping love story but Bert Kramer didn't gel with BM.

Of course the decision to try and turn Iris into a heroine was also a fail.

Donald May was a popular soap star and maybe as Alex the chemistry with Beverlee would have been better,

But Texas had so many issues...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'd agree that that was TEXAS' number-one issue, along with premiering at sixty minutes (too much padding!) and trying too hard to be daytime's answer to DALLAS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

If anyone (who isn't named Megan McTavish) ever needed to write a memoir about their career writing for daytime dramas, it's Patrick Mulcahey.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    •   Like I said I wasn’t talking about characterization. It makes sense that Dani is in denial. However literally no one in the real world would accuse someone of faking a pregnancy. Why? Because it’s just not feasible. What is Dani supposed to expect from Hayley—that she’ll be hiding a pillow under her shirt 24/7? Come on. The accusation has no legs, and that’s exactly why nobody would ever go there. A far more plausible accusation—one that actually has been made for centuries—is that someone might lie about who the father is. Dani only vaguely hinted at that, but at least that angle would make some narrative sense. I’d go for a coworking space that would be home to these small businesses like Kat and Chelsea’s bag startup (the whole police station trope feels like copaganda to me)
    • I guess RTPP looked worse because it followed Another World, but it's a shame they didn't give it more time especially considering how the shows that were put on following it fared.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Durkin was awful. The writing did her no favors, but she was all wrong for the part, lacking the mix of mystery, steeliness, sorrow and hesitancy that defined Victoria. I still have the awful memory of Adam lugging her around like a rag doll. She looked much more like one of the Blue Whale dancing extras than Victoria. And her voice... Maybe I am too harsh. With that said, Curtis didn't seem as bothered. I see from a fan review mentioning Barnabas & Company that Durkin was asked to return for Victoria's final episodes and declined as she had a Christmas trip to Europe with her husband planned and wasn't interested in just a few appearances.  I refuse to believe Victoria actually died during the Leviathan storyline. If Barnabas and Angelique could come back 8 times, she could come back a few.
    • It's a shame she only appeared in three episodes for the purpose of being written out - I thought she was quite good in the little we saw. I liked her vibe better than Durkin that never seemed to quite capture Victoria as a character.
    • He did a lot of romance novel covers, so that might've just been enough for them to get their panties in a twist.
    • Pre-TGIF, ABC most successful 1980s Friday 8 pm comedy I'd say was Webster. Full House wasn't a hit its first two seasons but it started showing growth in its third season which overlapped with the launch of TGIF. Funny thing is, Full House became a Top 10 show with the 1991/92 move to Tuesday.
    • Oakland Tribune, 14 July 1985   AW is another show with Schenkel at helm By Connie Passalacqua For the most part, dictators of South American banana republics enjoy better reputations than executive producers of daytime soap operas. Total authority is vested in these producers, who can kill off a character (thus firing an actor) with a stroke of a pen, or completely change life in his or her soap opera dominion (both in its fictional locale and backstage at the studio) on any kind of whim.  Most rule despotically, inspiring fear in their actors and writers. Which inevitably surfaces on the screen and subtracts from a show's quality. Then there's Stephen Schenkel who became executive producer of Another World last fall. He's been described by one of his actresses as "a teddy bear." He has noticeably improved the show, mostly because his natural warmth encourages backstage cohesiveness, and he believes in personally nurturing his staff and cast. 'I like to be supportive', he said.' I like to generate a certain amount of enthusiasm. I love actors and writers and technical people. And I like to laugh..  ' Schenkel said that most of the factors that have led to the shows improved ratings existed before he took over. There were well defined characters, outstanding writers and excellent production values, he explains. 'These things were in place but needed to be stimulated. There wasn't a lot of excitement. What really was missing was an adequate story. We added Gillian Spencer as a writer. (she also plays Daisy on All My Children), who's wonderful, and it just coalesced. The writers energy and commitment to the show began to give it an emotional intensity and some real passion within the characters." Schenkel, a former ABC programming executive who helped develop Ryan's Hope, is a strong believer in stressing romantic and comedy elements in soap operas. AW is also one of the only soaps with an established group of comic characters, including Wallingford (Brent Collins) and Lily Mason (Jackee , Harry). Schenkel raves about the talents of all his actors, and even has something good to say about the Brooklyn location of the shows studio, which most of his Manhattan-oriented staff loathe. I like the people here. I like to walk down the street and feel their energies, he said. He also violateda soap opera no-no, ' inviting actors and writers to the same party. "Everyone got to know one another, he said. And I didn't get any complaints about actors ' begging for story lines, he said. 
    • Since it's pride month.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • National City Star-News, 5 May 1977 TV topics by Peter Blazi Lear’s ‘All that Glitters’—doesn’t The best thing that can be said about Norman Lear’s newest soap opera“All That Glitters” is that it comes on so late at night most people will miss it. Role reversal is supposed to be the big draw, with women the breadwinners, mainly executives of a huge conglomerate. The men either fuss with the housework or fidget at the office as secretaries to their bawdy bosses. A female fantasyland? I doubt it. While the role reversal idea has some possibilities, the show pushes too hard for laughs and winds up with raucous females and effete males. A confident, independent woman is indeed a sight to behold and attract, but femininity need not be sacrificed. Unlike Lear’s “Mary Hartman, Mary Hartman,” "Glitters” doesn’t, but you’ve got to give him credit for trying. Today’s experimental comedy is what tomorrow’s hits are made of. Better luck next time, Norman. (“All That Glitters” can be seen weekday evenings at 11 p.m. on Channel 6.) .
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy