Jump to content

Neighbours: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

 

If the execs who'd shepherded the revival had stayed, then I could have seen them possibly giving the show more time, but given the contracting economy and how unsuccessful most streaming attempts of soaps are (other than some of the smaller indie soaps like The Bay), the cancelation did feel inevitable.

The Varga-Murphy family were the best part of the revival for me - I would have said the Rodwells but all of that was dismantled last year. I felt more invested in the family before the baby rabies plot, but still, I appreciate them, and they are easily one of the most believable same-sex couples on a soap as well as one of the few times a family headed by a same-sex couple hasn't felt like it was built on something offputting (like a one night stand or some kind of mishandled adoption). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

From what we've seen reported, I fully believe the change from Freevee to Prime Video (which I preferred in terms of ads, etc.) and changing of executives is what killed Neighbours, and the fact it happened so recently leads me to believe there was [some] kind of hope for a renewal from Amazon MGM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it's a combination of FreeVee going away, maybe soft numbers vs. budget, and new execs just not seeing the vision.

A year-round soap is long haul trucking. Most streamers do not understand that kind of commitment and the growth or retention factors unless they already began on terrestrial/network TV (like Peacock). They love to rely on massive backlogs of 6-12 to 15-20 years of sitcom or drama 'content' like Grey's, Cheers, Law & Order, etc. to keep subscribers, but having to maintain that kind of grind is new and alien to most streaming outlets. Which is why I have always advocated for doing it Gottlieb/PC-style in the US: Seasonal, 13-16 weeks on and off with several months' break. That at least allows a streamer to get used to the concept of serialized daily drama.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Neighbours and Home & Away would both take 2-3 months off in their Australian runs. I wish they'd considered the same with Neighbours on Amazon. The most they've done was a two week break this past December.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, but per TV Tonight's reporting:

❝ Neighbours has actually been successful on Freevee, but Amazon axed the platform itself late last year, moving the soap to Prime Video. During that time the execs who had originally championed the recommission had also gone, with a change of direction under the new regime. ❞

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I really did think they'd take a bigger break (maybe they thought with just four episodes a week, it wasn't needed?)

It DOES seem like suddenly streamers, but especially Amazon Prime, are all in with their main non binge-format programming being reality and game shows (I know Pop Culture Jeopardy has been a huge hit.)  I can't help but see the irony of reality pushing out scripted shows...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think he's been somewhat optimistic and very much choosing his words wisely this go 'round, given the reprieve they received from Amazon Freevee back in 2022. And he's been maintaining there are still stories to tell; I am sure he's searching for other avenues a bit more this time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree, @Liberty City 

As the spokesperson for the show, JH must have permission/guidance from Fremantle Media to use language such as 'this chapter' and 'we'd love to see it continue.' That has to be intentional, and am sure there's several discussions ongoing behind the scenes as we speak. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The way this show handled Nikolas' shooting Hayden, Austin's murder, the long slow delay to getting rid of Cyrus, etc. we're likely to have it revealed in a year when Nina is 3 weeks away from leaving and has had minimal airtime.
    • Interesting. I love my Roku.  No, I don't know. Who? I mean Disney def does. I would think a number of parties have stocks.
    • Is he still spamming demands that they hire the campy chick from The Haves and Have Nots? Or whichever show it was. I don't think it's an either/or. I happen to think Dana, Dani, Eva, Nicole, Kat, etc. are all great. Certain folks aren't going to be some posters' favorites and that's fair enough. But I would argue most of those characters above (and several others) have caught on with a lot of the online audience. I've even warmed up to Martin!
    • We get it, you don't like this show or the actors. You've said that over and over again, Mr. Vanguard America/VDARE.
    • Lol at the WSB hot guy asking Joss if she was okay with betraying her friends.  Of course she is! Chase coming in hot at Dante was a choice. It's also quite hypocritical since Chase is lying to him about Dante's own child and making Lulu the bad guy.  Talk to the grown woman yourself Chase.  Don't make Dante do it. Lulu and Laura had some great scenes. The Rocco/Danny party is obvious an anvil for something happening and probably the Gio secret coming out. The Willow/Drew/Nina scenes were kind of anti-climatic?  I get why Nina chose this path as the way to get rid of Drew, but will anyone ever find out Drew was sleeping with Nina?  
    • I was reading the NYT article on Roku's purchase of FrndlyTV. As anyone who has read my posting knows, I think re-airing old soaps is an imprudent idea. However, I will admit that if large media companies are looking for more streaming content.  And, if advances in AI continue to make the digitization process faster and cheaper.  Those of you who want the owners of the IP to release anything in their vaults may have reason to be hopeful.  Because the makers of TV's want to get into streaming in order to encourage young people to get back in the habit of updating their TV devices every few years.  And, Roku's plan is market exclusive content, that you have to buy a Roku device to view.  And you-know-who has a ton of content to sell.
    • This was  the messiest hour of television I’ve seen since Kenya Moore asked “who is this hoe?”
    • details of the current Health Secretary RFK Jr's insane beliefs - Doesn't believe that germs cause illness; suggests HIV doesn't cause AIDS; suggests antidepressants are behind mass shootings; believes that vaccines are harmful; suggests chemicals in water are changing children's gender identities... and is quick to promote supplements to prevent and treat diseases, such as recently recommending vitamin A for measles and falsely claiming children who die from the viral infection are malnourished. https://arstechnica.com/health/2025/04/rfk-jr-s-anti-vaccine-stance-is-rooted-in-a-disbelief-in-germ-theory/
    • Please register in order to view this content

      I missed the reference at the time, but those DAYS writers really like jokey character names.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy