Jump to content

February 4-8, 2008


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 171
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

You know regardless of opinions, people should know better by now than to engage with any type of conversation with a certain poster. We run into some crap like this every week and its always about the same thing, I've participated in the past, but I've come to the realization that its not worth it to get into it with fanboys and fangirls. I also find it funny that a certain poster only posts in the ratings thread and hardly any thing else, but oh well....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Their idea of thinking outside thedamn box is giving us leprechans running around town, heriones possesed by the devil, retconning someone's identity 8 times in 25 years (and counting), blowing up half the town, having a plane crash every year, or erasing someone's memory and putting it on a computer disc.

Not to mention having a aborted fetus running around town alive and grown and hyping a huge event where a town is destoryed in a gas explosion, but the only thing that happens is no one dies, the characters talk to each other and one of the show's heroines does a Curly from the Three Stooges and ends up in a coma after getting knocked in the head with a rock.

Oh yeah......we just LOVE that [!@#$%^&*]. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Malone thought so "out of the box" that he destroyed his own past reputation. I should know, I used to be his biggest fan. With a few exceptional storylines or characters, by and large most of what he did at OLTL last time was sadly an embarrassment. Mitch? Keri's death? Gabrielle? Flynn? Tico? I could go on and on. There was new insanity every week. I would only want him back at OLTL as a consultant or staff writer.

Also, if this is about what I think it is, you ought to know he created the dreaded Jolie vs. Jovan with his 90s model of John as Patrick, Natalie as Marty, and Evangeline and Paul Cramer as Blair and Dylan Moody. He would not have made Evangeline queen of the show in quite the same way Dena Higley did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Me too. I was saying on another board that it's like there's someone else writing for Jesse and Angie. When Angie passed out at the graveyard after seeing Jesse everyone told her that she was imagining things but when she was alone she asked herself "Why would I see Jesse looking 20 years older? Wouldn't he look the way he did when he died?" A smart question from a smart woman. And the type of thing that we the viewers would've torn her to pieces for if the show hadn't addressed it.

Everyone keeps saying stunt casting can't save AMC only better writing can do that. Well hold on to your hats folks the writing has gotten better even if it only for 10 out of 42 minutes.

As for OLTL, the only thing RC really had going for him was the fact that Dena sucked. The average squirrel on crack could pen better stories than she did. And now the show isn't living up to all the post Dena-hype Frons paid for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

skate are boring. good thing Claudia came in just in time to stir up trouble with that couple. I'm still hoping the writers pair Claudia/Sonny. they have the potential to do the whole mr/mrs smith S/L. sleep with the enemy. but at the same time trying an kill each other. :lol: since Guza likes to do shootouts. it could be done if he really wanted to do it. interesting how things may be. that's probably will there going with this S/L with Claudia. and sonny fighting over Lorenzo's waterfront property.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Believe it or not i agree with you to a point. Malone f*cked up BIG TIME and those mistakes are best summed up in three word Summer of Santi. I don't know what you think this is about and maybe I am remembering wrongly Jolie v Jovan was a Higley thing. Malone wrote John as damaged and complicated but he still capable of smiling, conversing and showering. I believe that left to Malone, Van/John/Nat wouldn't have been a romantic triangle but an examination of John's hero complex. It was the great geometrist Higley that turned them into the hot mess they became. And you're right Malone wouldn't have made Evangeline the queen of the show. He would have made her a consistent fleshed out character with a backstory that might explain the stuff we saw her do when she was on screen. Complex characterization was Malone's strong suit. But please let's get away from the Jowars because that wasn't my point

When I think of Malone I think of the spring fling rape of Marty, Billy Douglas and AIDS quilt and Megan's lupus. These are the stories OLTL still points to when they try to position themselves. What I liked about Malone is that he wasn't afraid of controversy or to let his characters act ugly if it made sense. Remember how Clint didn't like the idea of Joey hanging out with Billy Douglas because he was gay? That wasn't pretty but it made sense. Writers don't have that kind of bravery anymore and with network suits breathing down their necks they'll never develop it.

But I contend that a OLTL with Malone as a consultant or cowriter would be a whole lot better than the festival of tedious boredom that greets viewers every day at 2:00 EST.

Of course nothing good can happen until Sweeney gets enough sense to put her foot in Frons ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I grew up watching Malone's first run and still love what he did, but the fact is suits or no suits he destroyed himself at AW and then again at OLTL the second time. He had good ideas but could not execute properly without a strong EP - without Linda Gottlieb or Josh Griffith to rein him in he consistently went OTT or childish, and even when Griffith was there in 2003 and 2004 they did some baaad work. He also brought us John who became the monster who ate Llanview and every woman's brain.

I far prefer OLTL today to him in charge, but that's me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Malone brought us John but its Frons' that turned him into the omnipresent, preverbal, devolved scourge his is now. (And I'm a fan!). Frons has such a mancrush on Michael Easton he'd shove old ladies into the East River just for the chance to spend a moment in his presence. I haven't seen such an obvious case of boylonging since Rebel Without a Cause.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Actually I don't give a [!@#$%^&*] about you. I can not think of one time when I have watched a soap opera, or for that matter any television show, movie or anything else and thought hmmm, I wonder what Shawn Perez at SON thinks. Does that answer your question?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • There has been some confusion about Michael & facial burns. Please see this post: https://bsky.app/profile/shallotpeel.bsky.social/post/3lqkrryu54226 I've chosen to put this here instead of the Classic Thread because it is now with the appearance of recast Michael that this has come up. Different places online, including at least one podcast, remarks have been made about how remarkable it is that he is without facial scarring. Other fans say it was clear from the first that he did not have facial burns. What is included in this post is 2 screengrabs where you can see his face at the hospital & a very quick edit of that day in the hospital. 
    • Put me in the LOVE KMH camp. As a poster alluded to above, her detractors seem to come from people who first experienced the 80s Emily actress. And that's often the case with soaps, myself included. I enjoy the original actor so much that I just never take to the recast. However, KMH played Emily far longer than the original - for almost 20 years - and when she had great material, she was great. I get the sense she didn't like playing the whiny oh-woe-is-me Emily which was all the material she got from about 1996 until she took over the Intruder in late '99/early '00 and got to play a stronger kiss-ass woman who didn't care what anyone thought of her. (Some would call that a bitch but, if a man was in that role, he'd just be called a smart and savvy businessman.) Her relationship with Hal was great. The transformation was done realistically and I thoroughly enjoyed those years the best out of all. Once the writers decided to break up those two, they went back to writing Emily half the time as whiny and pathetic. I preferred when the writers made her stronger.
    • Hahaha - I do. I've always been the type, though, that can't miss anything. I get FOMO, so I'll not skip episodes or fast forward anything. There are only a few TV shows I've dropped because they got so bad vs. sticking it out to the end.  The promise that GL 1997 is better is what keeps me going. I especially want to see the fallout of Blake's lie about her twins and then Annie's descent which I believe won Watros's Emmy.
    • Rita's rape is an episode i constantly search on YouTube hoping one day that it will show up. I always feel like I may have seen it, but I was only 6 at the time and can never figure any of the things I have vague recollection of 
    • FROM THE VAULT: NON-SOAP DAYTIME RATINGS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM FEBRUARY 1973 & MAY 1973:

      Please register in order to view this content

        FROM THE VAULT: NON-SOAP DAYTIME RATINGS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM AUGUST 1973 & NOVEMBER 1973:
    • The rape was in 1979 after they were married. Blake was the result of Holly cheating with him while she was married to Ed. I believe she was born in 1975. 
    • No. Ed and Holly were married and having problems. She had an affair with Roger and that's when Christina--Blake--was conceived. The rape happened much later, after Holly and Roger were married.
    • Was Blake the product of Roger raping Holly, or did that come after when they were a couple?
    • I really wish we could see that episode...absolutely, my memory could be faulty, it was a very long time ago. I'm not going to contradict what the actors said--there has to be a reason it made them so uncomfortable that they talked about it in the press and complained to TPTB. I think that was the first one where they made the point that they wanted to educate the audience about the subject.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy