Jump to content

GH's 24...


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 345
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Well I didn't NEED to be impressed. I needed to see everything that was going on without it all being in quick flashes, choppy film editing, etc. These scenes would have had 10X more intensity had they left the theatrics alone and just let the explosion do what it was supposed to do.

VERY anticlimactic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah I thought the ending was good but it was very hard to see anything that was happening. I only saw Sonny and Carly on the ground and Liz picked up by Jason. I get that there was lighting and tear gas but the editing and all could have been better. It was still a great ending but the rest of the episode did drag a bit, much like alot of this has. I still give GH credit for doing this and I think it was an overall good effort and result.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The end on Fridya was awesome. I just wish the bad guy was somebody we knew..not this Mr Craig. Like, who? Haha..Spinelli has got to go, too bad he won't be killed off. I'm really sad about Alan, and those scenes with Monica were really sad. Sam is butt. I really love Maxie and that one guy together. It would've been awesome if Robert was the guy to save them all, but it always turns out to be Jason, haha.q

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They need to tone down Spinelli if they plan on keeping him. He's starting to become annoying.

Wow, I disagree 100%. When I first saw the explosion at the beginning of the 24 stunt, I thought it was lackluster. This time around I thought it was amazing. The slow motion is used as a reason to get the audience to get emotion from the audience. As I mentioned before with the 'Y&R JT/Colleen' thing, they did the same thing here. I didn't feel it was anticlimatic at all. That wasn't choppy camera work, but quite impressive, and a definite Emmy submission. That last scene was brilliant. But we can agree to disagree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

GH can do whatever they want for the rest of the month as far as I'm concerned. I got my payoff at the end of Friday's episode. Seeing the beginning of today's (Monday 2/19) episode drove that home for me.

Of course, flaws galore (Lulu, Natalia Livingston, Robin being coherent after makeshift surgery and bleeding for 10 hours), but overall, I think GH took a very ambitious storytelling approach and I am proud of them for doing their best.

It's not like McTavish's AMC which is really dragging its feet over there. We're watching recycled story inside of recycled story inside of recycled story. Nothing fresh or ambitious over there. I miss the days when I could applaud that show the way I've done with this show in the last six months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Friday and today are examples of the great episodes we should be seeing year 'round. Today's episode specifically was nicely balanced between Monica/Tracy/Alan, Sonny & Carly, Robin/Patrick, Jason/Elizabeth and then the rest of them. No one was forced down your throat and with the exception of Nikolas' hysteronics and plehgm flying out the corner of his Tylers mouth, today was excellently written. I'll even give the Liason tag an A. It would have gotten an A+, but we already have seen a paternity secret reveal in an elevator before. They don't get points for originality.

My only gripe is that I would have loved to seen Luke and Mac working together to make a last-minute rescue effort for their kids. But, beggers can't be choosers. I'll take what I can get. Do expect it to go back to crap tomorrow or even Wednesday? Sure. Not much we can do about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Cheryl was gone before Lemay came back but I agree with your thinking that he would rather a character from a family he introduced to the show than a family he did not originate.  I remember reading somewhere in the early 90's probably after DS left as writer, their was an either a writer or a producer who made a comment that their intent was bring the McKinnon family back to AW.  Would have made sense for the newer viewers from the 80's.  Much like Lemay's attempt to bring the Frames back from his writing in the 70's in his 1988 return
    • DePriest left in January 1988. According to the AWHP, Rose last appeared nearly a year before in February 1987 while both Sara and Peggy appeared as late as October 1987.
    • Annie was not brought in as an antagonist for Reva. Reva wasn’t even on the canvas when Annie first appeared in late 1994. 
    • The speculation……….very entertaining. 
    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
    • That would have made sense. Did all these characters get dropped when DePriest left or had they already been dropped?
    • The other issue with Missy: in June 2020, she "liked" some social media posts by Candace Owens -- things Candace said that were against Black Lives Matter.  That is described here https://tvline.com/news/melissa-reeves-racism-days-of-our-lives-instagram-controversy-2894568/ I don't know if that was ever resolved.
    • She appeared onscreen not long after Rose Livingston and Sara Montaigne, and we found out that Sara was Rose's estranged daughter. I wonder whether Peggy might have been part of that family group -- or else they were just juggling a few different potential mysteries so that they could develop whatever seemed to be getting the best response from the audience. They didn't do anything much with Rose and Sara really either. Maybe Rose would have become more prominent if Rachel and Mac had split up over Mitch, or if Sara had really flourished. In some ways I can picture Cheryl being affected by MJ's prostitution similarly to how Josie was distressed by finding out about Sharlene. But I can also see that Josie as a Frame being involved with Matthew would have different stakes for Rachel and Sharlene than Cheryl being involved with Scott. I do think the solution for Cheryl would have had to be a badder boy than Scott -- either a real bad boy who would do her wrong, or the kind of bad boy (not Chad!!!) who is essentially misunderstood and other people just don't understand. Cheryl would also have been better off with some friends her own age. Matthew and Josie benefited a bit from having other teenagers to interact with.
    • Sally Spencer was a decent actress, but the writing destroyed the "M.J." that Kathleen Layman had built. Layman had a quiet strength about her, and she and Osburn really felt like sisters. Spencer's character should have been either an unmentioned sister, or maybe Jake's that grew up close to Kathleen, M.J. and the rest, but was away for a few years before joining the force. Kristen Marie was o.k., but I always got a mousier vibe from her. Being pigeon-holed with Scott for most of the run hurt things for her, as well.  The Loves were also underserved between Rhonda Lewin and Philece Sampler. Philece would have been better as Nicole. Thank goodness Anne Heche  showed up for the next round of auditions. Christopher Holder was mediocre as Peter, but given a shot, I think Marcus Smythe could have stuck around for a while.  I would have had Peggy Lazarus be a Frame -- possibly an ex-wife for Vince with an agenda. Smythe and Hollen had  a fun chemistry that could have kept the two around.. Bringing recasts for  Cheryl and Ben back mixing it up with other Frames. Corys, Lawrences at the time might have kept all the families stronger. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy