Jump to content

Heroes / Heroes Reborn: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I appreciate all the articles being posted, I just wish more people here would talk about how they PERSONALLY feel about the show's choices. This thread looks like a Heroes media website, not a discussion thread. Are those posting the articles still watching? Have you turned off? If so, why?

I find that when I was watching season one, I'd see an episode and be thinking for hours after about what the episode meant and how dynamics were changed, what I learned, what pieces of the puzzle fell into place. Now, during season three, I find myself just a ball of confusion, trying to make sense of it all.

This whole eclipse mess was SLIGHTLY illuminating, and I suppose it gave a clue to something... I guess the powers are related to the sun as well? And Arthur Petrelli pretty much told the audience that we saw who these people really were deep down, without their powers. I guess that was the point of it? Because now we are back to where we left off two episodes ago, with Mohinder all slimy and disgusting, people repowered and ready for battle, etc. So it was just a two-episode detour from where they've been going this whole time? Just so we could see Claire die? Just so we can find out that Daphne had cerebral palsy? It was kind of a letdown. I was hoping that Daphne's secret was that she was much older and that the old guy in the house in Nebraska or wherever he was was actually her husband, not her father as it appeared, and her speed ability had reversed her aging process. I would have liked that MORE than learning she'd been on crutches her whole life. In the end, I do feel for Daphne more, so I guess that reveal had the desired effect.

I don't get what they are doing with Sylar. Is he good? Is he evil? Is he incapable of shedding his evil side? Is he good deep down, with a hunger that makes him do evil things? Is he a Petrelli? Are the Petrellis using him as Noah Bennet said in the last episode and he's not a Petrelli at all? Does he love Elle, or want to kill her? How is Elle suddenly over that he killed her father and taunted her about it?

What is Claire's issue? Is it abandonment issues because Daddy's always away hunting special people? Is it self-esteem issues because she's not like all the other kids at school? All I know is she just keeps getting mouthier and mouthier and making more stupid choices week after week. Where is her bio mother Meredith while Claire was at death's door? Is she going to learn that the Blue flame Redneck guy (whose name escapes me) is her maternal uncle?

I liked that they made a choice with Tracy Strauss, who seemed to be about self-preservation, which upholds her ice queen status, but then she was back-pedalling, telling Arthur Petrelli that she didn't take orders from him. Didn't she already choose to side with him?!

What's the point of Hiro thinking he's 10 years old? What's the point of Hiro taking Claire to the day when she was given to Noah? It makes NO SENSE to me how any of this is relevant.

I'm not understanding these characters anymore, or able to logically follow their changes in mood or direction like I could in previous seasons. I'm losing my connection to this canvas, and all these rapid-fire twists are just convoluting things, rather than making things more deliciously complicated. When the newest promo said "It's all been building to this moment..." I really couldn't figure out what the hell it's been building towards because none of it really makes sense or follows a linear path. The show is just all over the damn place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 503
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

That's pretty much how I feel. The characters are all over the place, flip-flopping from hero-to-villain-to-hero again (and the other way around with the "villains") and there's too many of them. They keep introducing these pockets of characters (like the ones in New Orleans, Maya and her brother, the villains that got set loose from their cells, the Haitian's brother (wth was the point?). They kill off Niki/Jessica, then we find out she's not just a twin, but a triplet. The Invisible Man comes and goes. The 500 year old Irish Samurai (or whatever he was) comes and goes. Claire's biological mother comes and goes. Angela is evil, no her husband is, no she is, no everybody is cuz they're all lying. Sylar is a Petrelli, no he isn't. Seth Green as the comic book store guy feels like stunt casting, or like somebody hiring a buddy. Mohinder is just boring no matter what shape he's in. Actors whose characters are dead (Takei, McDowell, Eric Roberts) keep coming back. The soaps make more sense than this. :P

Anyway...I've still been taping it but it's not a "rush and see" feeling for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

i *LOVED* tonight.

Claire & Hiro were super cute.

Yeah Elle is dead. damn this show. why her? So many more ppl needed to be killed first. Yes im looking at you Mya!

So they sai Sylar isnt Angelas & Arthers son. I wonder if that emans Claire can be Sylars baby daddy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think season one was amazing. I was really interested in all of the different storylines. I felt that I could empathsize with the characters because above all everything was rooted in reality. Claire was in high school and she dealt with storylines directed to that: the attempted rape/murder was must see television, Nathan trying to become senator and tango-ing with evil Linderman was must see stuff, Peter learning about his powers was good stuff. Episodes like "The Company Man" provided interesting character studies and analysis. I don't know it just seemed that everything gelled together and just fit and there were very interesting twists that fit as well. I remember when Peter went to see Mohinder and then encountered Sylar and that was an excellent cliff hanger. It was just perfect and everything built on top of another. From the pilot to the season finale.

Season two was really good at building things up and prolonging the excitement and was even good at delivering twists that made sense. However the concept wasn't well executed and it overall fell on a whimper with various storylines that just weren't interesting. It just didn't have a lot of momentum and it lacked a lot of the urgency and excitement season one had.

I feel that season three is the exact opposite. It has great concepts but they move so fast that they don't take the time out to show more indepth and take their time with each plot point. The concepts are great but it's the execution that has it's issues.

I think this is the crutch of the problem as well. Sylar should have been killed after the first season. He was the big bad of season one and they made a huge mistake in carrying him over to season two. Sylar isn't good. He may have been good through the ret-conning they are trying to pull now but he isn't. He was always supposed to be evil. He is capable of shedding his good side when he has people that "love" him as seen with Angela, Aurthur and Elle. But once that love is gone he reverts to evil. Which I hate. He isn't Aurthurs son. He may be Angela's. Who knows.

I never understood how Elle could not hate Sylar for killing her father either.

I don't know. I liked the very beginning about Claire feeling "raped" by Sylar and them going with that but lately they have transgressed that to her feeling abandonded by Noah which isn't nearly as interesting. It would be really good television to watch Claire come to terms with her "rape" and her not feeling human because she can't feel anything. But they don't want to go that far.

Exactly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

Why hasn't anyone posted the Fuller plan?  :blink:

Exclusive: Bryan Fuller's Rx for 'Heroes'

Michael Ausiello

Pushing Daisies fans will probably take a hit out on me for saying this, but something good has come out of the comedy's untimely death: It's freed up Bryan Fuller to rescue Heroes from the villain known as "What the Frak Have They Done to a Once-Great Show?!" In his first interview since rejoining the series as a consultant, the writer-producer-genius behind such acclaimed season 1 hours as "Company Man" reveals where it all went wrong, what it'll take to make it right, and who's gonna have to be sacrificed before that can happen.

AUSIELLO: Where did Heroes go wrong, in your opinion?

BRYAN FULLER: It became too dense and fell into certain sci-fi trappings. For instance, in the “Villains” arc, when you talk about formulas and catalysts, it takes the face off the drama. And I think the goal for everybody is to put a face back on the drama. You have to save something with a face; otherwise you don’t understand what you’re caring about. I thought the "Villains" arc started out very interestingly, and then became sort of muddy and dense and I couldn't get my hooks into the characters to understand their motivations. I also started to feel confused about what people's abilities were. One of the great things about the first season is that the metaphor for their abilities was very clear. Those metaphors seem to have gotten complicated in the past two seasons. I share that concern with everybody on the writing staff. It's not like I'm coming in and saying, "This is what you need to do to fix it!" Everybody knows what needs to be fixed and everybody is sort of rowing in that direction.

Your work starts with episode 19, yes?

Yes. I'm fortunate to be coming into a very exciting story line. [Former co-exec producers] Jeph [Loeb] and Jesse [Alexander], before they left the show, set so many great events in motion with the "Fugitives" arc [kicking off Feb. 2]. It really is a fresh start.

Are the "Fugitives" episodes leading up to 19 solid?

Yes. Episodes 14, 15 and 16 are amazing. The whole "Fugitives" arc starts out very strongly, and then it gets a little dense in the middle in terms of the mythology. So I came in right at the point where everybody was realizing, "Oh, we're getting too dense here and we need to put faces on stories because there is no face to a formula; there is no face to saving the world." So it's turning this big ship back into a character stream, and everyone on the writing staff shares that desire. We need to get back into a character place, because that's where this story started: Very clean, superhero metaphors to everyday life. That's the path that we're taking. But it is a big ship so it's going to take a little while to turn it.

Any plans to trim the sprawling cast?

We're also going to tell fewer stories per episode. We're going to limit it to three or four with one big one that you can wrap the stories around. We're altering the structure of the show so that there's a very clear A story that takes up a larger percentage of the show so that that story gets traction.

Are you looking at Season 4 as a complete reboot of the series?

It's not necessarily a reboot as much as it is going back to the basic spirit of the show and pulling people back in. I don't think the issues with the show have been about the serialization as much as about the density of the stories that have been serialized.  

Will you be part of the show next season?

That's the idea.

Will the recent behind-the-scenes changes at NBC impact the show at all?

It's really hard to imagine Heroes without [universal Media Studios president] Katherine Pope, because she has been such a proponent of the show. She was so instrumental in [setting] the tone and style of the show in the first season. She is as vital a piece as any of the players on the show at this moment. Her contribution can't be undervalued. It'll be very interesting to see how things shake out.

What's your working relationship with series creator Tim Kring been like since returning?

It's actually been very positive.

Who gets final say: you or Tim?

Tim. I’m a consultant. My job is to help facilitate the vision of the show, and the vision has been a little inconsistent. But “Fugitives” is such a great sea change. I think people who have been critical of Heroes will come back.

http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2008/12/exclusive-bryan.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The only reason I've never posted before, was because I wasn't sure how many eps we were out of sync with the US. I thought it was one, then it seemed to be two, and I got confused - a feeling that fitted in well with this season!

There wasn't any outstanding moments for me, just a lot of disappointment, mixed with some OK stuff. I liked when the two groups formed, Sylar & Elle, and the ep that integrated scenes from season 1 (even though that was good, it did all feel a little out of place, and slightly pointless to the overall story arc).

I hated the première ep - no show should ever start with the middle of the story, unless they're gonna spin it, and follow it with the beginning. Heroes didn't. We were shoved into the conflict between good and evil at hight speed, with future bad-ass Claire about to kill future Peter, which, by the end of Volume 3, had zero pay off (may be it'll crop up in Volume 4, along with that Hiro/Ando scene). I thought at some point we would return to that moment, but we never did. It was never explained how that scene worked in the grand scheme of the narrative, as all the way through, both Claire and Peter were on the same side. It was totally pointless (unless I missed something?). And why was future Peter, sporting that future-future scar, in the future scene set in the present future of Arthur's scheme? I realize that Arthur's death changed the future, but even if he had lived and succeeded in his plot, how would that have pitted Claire and peter on opposing sides?

Sylar is another aspect of Heroes, that doesn't work. I feel like he's fun his course. He just doesn't come off as threatening as he did in season 1. Sylar is a serial killer, who has no redeeming qualities, yet they keep trying to make it seem as if he does. He kills people for fun, and they still expect viewers to feel sympathy over his paternity puzzle! He's no Dexter. Sylar's flip-flopping aside, I also didn't like Nathan's sudden 180 in supporting Arthur's plan. It seemed too quick and easy - like Elle forgiving Sylar, in the same scene that she's blasting him with high voltage of energy!

Killing off characters with potential - Elle, Meradith...; Deaths that are repetitive and done for shock value - Claire and Sylar (Why? We know they can't die, so what's the point?); Lack of reality - everyone's forgotten their day jobs! Pointless plot points that lead nowhere - The catalyst (seriously, did that serve any real function?), Daphne's secret (doesn't really add anything to her character). ETA: The retcon of Jessica and replacing her with Barbara! Jessica was supposed to be Nikki's twin sister who died (as well as Nikki's alter ego).

I really hope Volume 4 is a major step up from Volume 3. It needs to be.

The ratings over here, have been pretty good. They stayed steady for most of the season on BBC2, up until the final three episodes, where they took a dive. But in contrast, the first run eps that air on BBC3, kept up their momentum. Heroes stayed as BBC3's #1 show, as well as #1 for most of the multi-channel market.

I thought The Office, had been granted the post-Superbowl slot?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I feel the same way, there was very little to really grab me and force me to remember any real distinct storyline. I feel that part of the problem was that there wasn't really an arc or any real story. It was just we have to stop this from happening and that's it. Nothing was woven together, nothing was truly compelling nor was there anything that made me feel any emotional ties to anyone. I feel everyone is just a pod and that characters could easily be replaced in certaint storylines and to be honest their abilities and their powers just aren't as riverting as they once were. The build up and twists were awful. They had a good premise in my opinon more so then season two, but my God. The execution was just sloppy.

The two groups forming really didn't do much. There wasn't really a battle between the two. More over the teams didn't accomplish or do much of anything. It was all just filler. I hated Sylar/Elle because of the fact that it made no sense. Elle as a character makes no sense because they change the basis of her character multiple times through out the story. When she first came on she was like the sociopathic Barbie, which was interesting. Then they decided to layer her character and give her more of a heart and give her more responsiblity at the beginning of season three and then they back peddled and destroyed her progess by having her step back in to sociopathic pikachu again. Her character had no direction and she was more or less just a plot puppet.

Sylar is another problem in itself. He should have died at the end of season one. Letting him live and then making him a part of the show (a bigger part then was necessary) hurt more then helped. Then making him indestructable, have the same power as Peter, retcon his character, his motivations and then try to make him good was the biggest fumble in the history of the show. I still don't get how that was supposed to work. :huh:

The eclipse episode was interesting. I felt that it was supposed to make us care about the characters again with out thier powers. However it didn't really accomplish that task. If anything it only showed how much the show has fallen since the first episode and it doesn't even make sense compared to the other episodes.

I actually thought the opening shot was very well done, It was interesting and pulled the focus from the disaster that was season two. Claire hunting Peter and Peter shooting Nathan was something that was needed to regain interest in the show after the fumble of season two. I will say they did a major bad but not following up on the alternative time line and not showing why and how this conflict and big bad occured. We only got vague answers as to why the alternate time line ended up so screwed up. We never really got an answer to why Claire turned "evil", why Peter was hunted, why Nathan felt compelled to give people powers, why Sylar turned good, ect. We never got an answer to all of the "changes" that took place. We really did need an episode to explain these things and express how the alternate time ended up the way it did.

Another thing how awful was Mohinder's storyline this season?

My guess is that eventually Aruthur would have gotten Claire into his side which would have led to Peter and Claire coming at odds, eventually. But yeah never explicitly said.

I agree. Kring has this issue where he feels the need to flop bad and good characters and then he believes that the characters should still be rootable. Nathan straddles the fence a LOT, in season one we are meant to see him as good but really he is rather ambiguous. In season two he is meant to be seen as good, a hero, the comeback hero. Then in mid season three he is evil again? I mean come on. Which one is he? He can't change this much in such a short amount of time.

I'll do you one better. Killing of characters that have been there since the beginning and don't deserve to be killed off: Isaac, Niki, Ted, D.L., Eden, Candice, ect. I mean why do they have to be killed off. More over if they are important to story and have potential why kill them off at all? I don't feel any love lost for Elle's death but Meredith shouldn't have been killed off.

I agree. However they really need to let Claire grow up, just ditch the cheerleader uniform.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • https://www.tvinsider.com/1180503/denise-alexander-dead-general-hospital-lesley-webber/ Alexander made her soap opera debut as Lois Adams on The Clear Horizon in 1960, but her big break came in 1966 when she was cast as Susan Hunter Martin on Days of Our Lives while still attending college at UCLA. As Susan, Alexander played a host of dramatic tales, including murdering her husband David Martin (played by Clive Clerk) in May 1967 after the death of their son. “She started out as the bad girl and was thrown out of boarding school for smoking and drinking,” recalled Alexander to We Love Soaps TV. “The character caught on and sparked something with the audience, and that is how Susan became an important part of the show. I was there for almost seven years…. I had such a wonderful time on Days. It was like going to camp every day for me. I loved the people, loved the show, and loved what I got to do. They loved the character and liked me as an actor and gave me lots of neat stuff to do. I didn’t even ask for a vacation for five years because if I worked 365 days a year, I thought I was great. It was a very good time in my life.” In 1973, Alexander was in contract negotiations with Days when ABC offered significant perks to the actress to join General Hospital to play Dr. Lesley Williams. Though Alexander loved her time in Salem, she decided to leave. “It was [Days’ Executive Producer] Betty Corday who sent me to General Hospital,” Alexander told welovesoaps.net. “She said, ‘You must do this.’ So when I went to General Hospital..."

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Now that GL and LOL synopses are being added I'd welcome requests for specific soaps from 1976.
    • By 78 NBC daytime was struggling. They knew what the issues were but failed to make the changes needed to get those young gals watching.  Jan 78 Plans for NBC's daytime programs - which are in third place -are apparently less well defined at the moment. Michael Brockman, a former daytime programer at ABC, took the position of vice president in charge of daytime for NBC just a few weeks ago. He and his chief assistant, Mary Alice Dwyer (an associate of Mr. Brockman at ABC), are in the process of analyzing the network's schedule to determine where to begin making changes. One thing Mr. Brockman knows, he said, is that NBC needs more women18 -49 (NBC is currently last in that category in daytime). "Whatever you design," he said, "has to fundamentally appeal to that demographic." He indicated, however, that he is less concerned with the network's afternoon serial block than he is with its morning game show and rerun mix, and, like his counterparts at the other networks, Mr. Brockman discounts the notion that recent drops in daytime viewership may be attributable to the one -hour serial form. The first changes were indeed in the morning. In April 78 Card Sharks replaced Sanford and Son reruns at 10am and High Rollers was introduced at 11am knocking Wheel of Fortune back to 11.30 replacing Knockout. Sanford and Son moved to noon replacing To Say the Least. On paper that looked like a stronger schedule. The next move in July was the disastrous America Alive at noon, replacing Sanford and The Gong Show,which set them back even further. Finally in October 78, Jeopardy was brought back at 10.30 and Hollywood Squares moved to 1pm replacing another flop For Richer for Poorer. The only major change for the soaps apart from cancelling FRFP, was Linda Grover as headwriter for The Doctors as of April 78.
    • Yeah, Ben and Evie don't start interacting in a 'we're going to pair them together as a couple' way until Feb/March 1977 when she recommends Ben paint a portrait for Jackie.  And Evie's working for Jackie so she and Ben interact and start to become friends.  That happens after Tim breaks up with  her and she's forgiven her sister.. and he and Hope break up after he covers for his younger brother for a crime that he had committed.  Jackie does come onto the canvas in December 1976 and the first months are her trying to snag Mike while she and Justin seem to play a cat and mouse game with one another as he's trying to restart things with Sara again. I often wonder if the Phillip story only came about because the show was going to be expanded to an hour.. and the Dobson's deciding that some of the new characters they were introducing could be tied to Justin/Jackie's back story.
    • Seems like the Dobsons were aiming for a Joe/Sara/Justin triangle or, having decided that Joe would be killed off, Justin would be waiting in the wings. But that never came to pass and I don't think there was much reference to Justin/Sara as time went on.That was something that could have been used later on but Doug Marland may not have known or cared. Also, when the show went to an hour they could add a lot of characters and not rely on the stalwarts, hence Jackie/Alan/Elizabeth. And after Leslie died, Mike went into Dad mode with Hope. Hope/Ben never took off and Hope was replaced and then dropped and Ben moved on to Eve, whose romance with Tim fizzled and Jordan Clarke left (by choice?)
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Would anyone have any of these Y&R episodes they could add to the vault? It would be very much appreciated. November 11, 1987 February 16, 1989 February 17, 1989 February 1991 episode - Brad vs Paul fight April 10, 1992 November 16, 1992 November 17, 1992 November 23-27, 1992 July 11, 1993 October 5, 1993 June 17, 1994  - english version June 29, 1994 September 15, 1994 May 16, 1995 August 4, 1995 October 27, 1995 March 11, 1996 April 8, 1996 September 6, 1996 November 26, 1996 January 3, 1997 January 27, 1997 February 17, 1997 February 18, 1997 March 5, 1997 April 22, 1997 June 16, 1997 September 23, 1997 September 24, 1997 September 25, 1997 December 11, 1998 January 12, 2000 September 27, 2000 March 5, 2001 March 6, 2001 March 8, 2001 - english version March 19, 2001 April 5, 2001 April 6, 2001 October 7, 2002 January 30, 2004 August 23, 2004 August 24, 2004 June 15, 2004 June 21, 2004 November 8, 2004                                          
    • When I was a kid, I would watch DOOL with my mom. I remember Denise as Susan so well. And later, of course, on GH. How sad to hear she has passed. RIP.
    • I have to dig that scene up on YT. I'm glad they gave them some kind of happy ending, even if it was really late. Interesting! I remember Justin and Sarah being involved, but I either forgot or never caught their backstory. The girl with money and social position of course turns out to be Jackie. He sort of did to Sarah what Vanessa did to his brother! I do remember Justin started out as not the greatest guy. Kind of a horn dog. It's only when Ross comes on that he becomes the "good" brother. I only have some vague memories of Ben and Hope, mostly of when they were in a positive relationship. He certainly changed over time. "Chill" would be the way I would describe Ben (along with "handsome but kind of a yawn") for most of his time on GL, so hearing he once had a violent temper is very surprising.
    • Yes. That's called good writing.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy