Jump to content

Y&R Returns!!


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 28
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

I firmly believe Sharon is being drugged somehow. That would be far better than a *brain tumor* - it would absolutely make sense. Plus with all the new types of G. H. B. that are out there, it's both plausible and realistic. Though I will miss LA - the Sharon/Cameron scenes really are entertaining.

And it would be better than Daisy being the killer. Daisy coming back into Daniel and Lucy's life would provide plenty of drama. Of course, Lucy has no idea about the circumstances of her conception. I wasn't really watching much at that time, but I had no idea that Billy + Victoria adopted Lucy at some point! There's a lot of story to mine and with MG at the center, you know it's going to watchable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have said the same re: Sharon is being drugged for a while now. Moreso after Mariah revealed that Sharon has been taking her meds. It was the only thing that could make sense. So I'm assuming these two are behind it and I would like to see how and hope the reveal makes sense.

 

I would love it if it was Daisy. And it makes sense as well. Heck, I'm surprised Sheila hasn't come looking for her other grandchild yet. And before she left, Daisy was dragging Phyllis a few times which was a bonus. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I still can't believe they killed Heather off to begin with, but this is kinda confusing. Daisy would've made sense, but Jordan and Ian Ward? Ian Ward would've made more sense in a Nikki/Dylan/Paul story, but with none of them here? And if Jordan wanted to torment the Newman's, why would she pick Sharon and Heather as her vessel to do that? It doesn't make any sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I understand Doug isn't coming back, but why would you kill off a core characters daughter if you can't bring her parents back? Why bring back Ian Ward but Paul and Dylan aren't around? It's bad writing. Killing Heather is a waste of a legacy character who had potential and a bad story all around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I'm following the news in Los Angeles at https://laist.com (independent public radio and news) They had up-to-the minute accurate info during the wildfires in January.  
    • That's a bit murky since that happened during a writers' strike. Assuming Kristen Marie had a 2-year contract she left about when her contract would have expired and Sharlene and Josie showed up right before that. Lemay was officially credited as HW from September 1988 but it seems very probable that his anticipated tenure influenced events that happened during the strike which started in April. 
    • I've seen so many posters over the years who are bright, creative, well-versed in soap history, and who care deeply about the integrity of the genre. I'd put the shows' chances in their hands a lot faster than I would allow any of the "usual suspects" to take control of the dramas they've already helped decimate. When I returned to university in the 1980s, I created a bible for a new soap and presented it in my screenwriting class. It was in reaction to how badly I saw the network shows being butchered at the time. The creative process was thrilling; a total joy, and I still smile when I remember the positive feedback I received from the professor and my fellow students. I was used to seeing written commentary from professors on my work. This one wrote me a long, complimentary note on the final page of the bible, but also graded it 97%, A+. I was beaming ear to ear for days!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Thanks. I do wonder if Rose was meant to be more given the caliber of actress they hired. I remembered Sara and Peggy staying longer as they were still on when Soapnet started their repeats. I wonder if that was part of the reason they brought Jake's brother in. 
    • Speculation about Missy Reeves' potential evolution on basic civil rights doesn’t change my opinion of her. My view is shaped entirely by her public social media presence—which I find unpalatable—and I have no interest in learning more beyond that. I simply liked Jennifer’s hair and dress. That’s as far as my admiration goes.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Cheryl was gone before Lemay came back but I agree with your thinking that he would rather a character from a family he introduced to the show than a family he did not originate.  I remember reading somewhere in the early 90's probably after DS left as writer, their was an either a writer or a producer who made a comment that their intent was bring the McKinnon family back to AW.  Would have made sense for the newer viewers from the 80's.  Much like Lemay's attempt to bring the Frames back from his writing in the 70's in his 1988 return
    • DePriest left in January 1988. According to the AWHP, Rose last appeared nearly a year before in February 1987 while both Sara and Peggy appeared as late as October 1987.
    • Annie was not brought in as an antagonist for Reva. Reva wasn’t even on the canvas when Annie first appeared in late 1994. 
    • The speculation……….very entertaining. 
    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy