Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members
Posted (edited)

People: "Soaps have sucked for the last 20 years, the industry is dying, we need a resurgence" 

*CBS boldly creates a new soap despite declining linear television and local news saturation*

People: "Eew no. The cast is the wrong color." 

You can't make this up

Please register in order to view this content

Even if you aren't interested in an all black soap, wouldn't you want to see the success of the first new soap a quarter century because it could possibly reinvigorate the genre? 

I've seen people suggest re-runs of ATWT from the 70s onwards... Honestly speaking, who outside of us niche viewers is going to watch that? The network also has to cater to the modern day soap audience. 

People have even suggested re-vamping old soaps. As much as I sympathize with that idea, a lot of those cast members are dead, and modern audiences may not remember some of the old stories.

Edited by Planet Soap
  • Members
Posted (edited)

Man, I don't know. Every year we have more and more of these ancient-ass SON accounts dating back 20 years coming out of hibernation, most with minimal to no posting history, to act deranged all over the board. Some of y'all know what I'm talking about.

Before he claimed full ownership of BTG upon its announcement and then began to turn on it for not being the show he made up in his head, vanguard's only post on this forum was complaining about Empire ten years ago. I don't know what this person is going through but I am through sanctioning it. He can join my very large Ignore filter.

Edited by Vee
  • Members
Posted

All I know is that I am looking forward to a new soap, and the fact that it is on CBS makes it easier for me. Other channel soaps, besides Hollyoaks, don't do it for me, and I don't know why.  

  • Members
Posted

CDN media

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTR1DpvIdOexv36nvXp-Me

 

But I agree. I feel like it's been said time and time again, but these weirdos only have power if we give them power. It makes me look at the people who willingly, and earnestly, go back and forth with them kinda differently, too.

  • Members
Posted

YES, lol!!!!!

For years, we've had to be messy vicariously, through larger-than-life characters like Erica Kane and Victor Newman.  Not that I don't still love me some Erica and Victor (or some "Miss Chancellor" with those fabulous nails and diamonds), but now we're up in the big leagues, gettin' OUR turn at bat; and I, for one, cannot wait.

Thank you, thank you and THANK. YOU.

  • Members
Posted

This right here is a life lesson I've had to learn. You can make your point, but after a certain while you have to realize people's minds are set and just walk away. 

Likewise the weirdos only have power if you acknowledge them.

Posted

I'm just gonna put this out there. Do I employ the stratagem "Just keep strolling on" Yes, of course I do, also been known to recommend it. Other stratagems vary from place to place. Whether it is Block or Ignore or Mute, I use them all.  But on occasion, not very often, I say to myself, This is such an uncomfortable situation, maybe I could defuse it with humor. Obviously high risk since it could be a flop.

  • Members
Posted

I haven’t posted much but I’m super excited for a new soap with a lot of people that look like me. I know audiences these days are so quick to drop stuff but I truly hope this is a success. The genre needs it and us fans deserve it.

  • Members
Posted

I think the biggest obstacle that Beyond the Gates will have is that it usually does take a while for soaps to properly gel and since linear is dying there's not really a lot of channel surfing and people coming across the show in the same way it used to be. Hopefully as the show starts building up a library of episodes people might start putting it on while doing other things and get hooked that way down the road. I know Netflix wanted recently mandated shows to have more "casual friendly" scripts for this reason.

  • Members
Posted

Regarding the latest pictures, my only pet peeve is that I hate it when there are no ‘shadows’ in the lighting. For example, the DAYS flat look or even the GH flat look bore me. I much prefer the B&B look or even Y&R because they have some contrast (ironically, I loved ATWT’s look in the early 00s and even GL’s light and pastel look in the Brown & Esenstein era… go figure!).

Another thing they should do: they should pack the weekly 5 episodes into a weekly 1 hour long ‘prime time’ edit. These days viewers are dying to go back to 20+ episode seasons. This solution would be ideal. 

  • Members
Posted

I think it's hard to tell how it's going to look, honestly. Unfortunately, the "modern" look isn't very pro-shadow in American daytime. But again, we haven't seen much of anything yet, so I'm excited to see how all sets will look in the "daytime" and during the "nighttime". It'll be interesting. Although, there are shadows within the sets (just re-watched the teaser), but I doubt they want to paint their actors with overshadowed lighting.

Glad others are noticing it, 'cause.... w h e w.

  • Members
Posted

I love the new shots and the new info we are getting. I love that angle they are exploring. MVJ is going to show all these tired writers... how it's f-cking DONE! I am sooooooo ready!  

Please register in order to view this content

My Anita is shining. The Matriarch of DAYTIME has arrived, and she is here to expose people and show their true colors! And look at that handsome man! He is ageing like fine wine!!!!!!!!!!!!!

P.S Speaking of showing true colors... I see this topic's disturbing presence has more or less completely shown their true face. And it aint pretty. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Seeing Peter Bergman (Jack) and Melody Thomas Scott (Nikki) act opposite each other really makes me mad that their short-lived reunion in 2012 was just that... short-lived. I've always loved the Jack/Nikki pairing.
    • No.  I recall there was also a mention about how distracting it was EOB's Gwen wasn't wearing nail polish as well.  That it was someone's pet peeve. And, yes, the fact characters can have a manicure in prison is the wildest continuity issue here.
    • Can anyone remember Mary Ellen Stuart's run as Jenny? I'm trying to fill in the cracks for missing stuff that we overlooked.  Bulletpoints:  * Dated Ross * Rusty's police partner * Directly responsible for Dinah coming forward about George Stewart (Cam's father)
    • But that's not weird... nail polish is allowed in prisons via commissary. Same with general makeup, haircuts, and hair colouring products.
    • This is DAYS, the show that said you could brainwash anyone with simple kitchen appliances.  An actor's nail polish or lack thereof should be the least of our concerns, lol.
    • It was not that she wasn't wearing nail polish, it is that she managed to get a manicure in prison
    • "We're Knot Done Yet": the name of this lovely podcast AND what JVA tells her plastic surgeon at every appointment. In other news, Michele Lee is reminding me more and more of my old music teacher from elementary school, and I couldn't STAND that bitch.
    • I apologize if this has been covered already, but does anyone know whether Douglas Marland was HW'ing by that point?  If he was, then I see what he meant when he said (in so many words) that he had inherited a mess when he started at GH.  Aside from Alan and Monica, none of that material seems very promising.  The story with Mark Dante and the Corbins is the wrong kind of predictable (y'know, the kind where you know what's going to happen, but you just don't give a crap?), the stuff with Scotty and Laura is cute but toothless, I don't know WHAT the hell Gina and Steve Carlson's character are arguing about and Rick Webber has to be the dumbest man alive not to see David Hamilton twirling his invisible moustache over how to make a killing off Lamont Corbin's declining health.  (By the way, "LAMONT CORBIN"?  What is this, "The Shadow"?  And "Corbin Limited" sounds like some jive I'd hear over on Y&R.) In a way, it's kind of like watching today's GH, right down to the dialogue that's serviceable and pushes plot along but says nothing about the characters' inner lives.
    • It absolutely was; the narrative was there, and they followed it promptly. Maybe that's back when women had babies at young ages?!?!?
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy