Jump to content

BTG: History, Behind the Scenes Articles & Photos


Errol

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Please register in order to view this content

Not only has Beyond the Gates inspired me to reactivate my long-dormant SON account but all of sudden I am finding myself once again immersed in the art and history of the American soap opera. I wonder how many other lapsed soap fans who have been turned off by the dismal ghost towns of Genoa City, Salem, Port Charles, and Forrester Creations might be lured back by the promise of a brand new soap. I am thrilled to rejoin you all for this journey. I have so many thoughts to share, but I will start with this one:

Do we think MVJ has followed the tradition of Irna Phillips and Agnes Nixon by penning an epigraph for her bible? Something like, "We do not live beyond these gates alone, but beyond a thousand other gates."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Webmaster

Although not by timeslot, the soaps still compete among their genre. It would be very noticeable by CBS should Beyond the Gates outperform B&B among the demos, and viewers overall. So, while not direct competition since they'll be on the same network, the performance of both shows (and Y&R) will be closely watched, followed and studied by CBS execs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think BTG has an uphill battle if we talk pure ratings. It has direct competition from GH in that timeslot, and obviously the 2pm timeslot is less desirable in terms of getting an afternoon audience. Not to mention, it will follow a creatively bankrupt BOLD in most markets.

That said, more telling is how the show resonates and does with Black demographics from the onset, the demographic the show was originally created to serve. That is the main audience they hope to aim advertising $$$ to and if they don’t support it, that will be a major issue. 

Edited by BetterForgotten
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

One thing it has that other new soaps didn't is a second window on streaming. Passions would have likely never gone off the air if it aired in the streaming era. In terms of live ratings, I want to see it at least do better than The Talk which was averaging about 1.3 million viewers. The CBS soaps are averaging around 3.24m and 2.81 for the past season, but it's hard to say how a new soap would do. I just hope for the best. I'll admit, the only thing I'm nervous about is ratings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Webmaster

Not to taint the thread, but I am seriously getting annoyed with the phrase "Black soap." Therefore, I'm personally not going to refer to the show as such.

Does the show have a predominantly Black cast? Yes, but it is not a "Black soap." There shouldn't be such a thing, IMO. Just like there isn't a "White soap."

For me, the phrase is a huge turn off for general audiences and I hope it doesn't deter people from tuning in, thinking the show can't be consumed by them simply because they aren't "Black." This can be said of White, Latino, Asian, or any other ethnic background.

I've been thinking about this for a while, not just in terms of Beyond the Gates, but in general. Media and politicians like to place things into categories but only do so to fit certain key narratives, and I'm tired of it.

For me, Beyond the Gates is just a daytime soap opera with a predominantly Black cast. Its storylines aren't going to be any different than the ones featured on other shows, with rare exceptions, and it shouldn't be put into a bubble where the world thinks it's just a soap catering to a specific demographic (an underrepresented one, yes), whereas the other soaps are geared towards everyone else.

One of the things that has always bothered me about "Black" being used to refer to race when talking about shows or movies, is that the term "black comedy" doesn't refer to race at all.

Dictionary definition:

Although the same definition doesn't apply to "Black drama," I'm sticking to my stance on the matter overall.

Ted Talk over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • "And OMG, watching the scenes of Roger's return in comparison...the quality in the writing really nosedived. The stupid mask." Very much agreed.  Having Roger hide behind a mask for weeks/months, with it culminating with him swinging in on a vine at Blake/Phillip's wedding....geez.  So juvenile. IMO, Guiding Light never did a good job reintroducing major characters, either from the dead or elsewhere.  Masked balls = awful.  Amish = awful. When Reva was brought back from the dead, she should've just showed up in Springfield as Reva, and informed everyone that she had been gone for years because she felt like it.  She had a four-year fling with some dude who ended up dumping her due to disloyalty. Josh would be pissed and declare that their love is not *always* but *sometimes* and he'd act accordingly.  Her kids would hate her.   
    • Agreed. The Emmys next year are gonna be a pretty tough competition and I hope we get a Days sweep lol  Not only does Deidre deserve a nomination for these last few weeks, but I also think Paul Telfer, Raven Bowens, Carson Boatman, Dan Feuerriegel and Alison Sweeney have good chances as well.
    • It’s not about a lack of faith and trust in MVJ, it’s about a a lack of faith and trust in Ron Carlivati, who I think can be very sneaky and manipulative when he wants to be.  And, all that “He’s just a breakdown writer” talk never changed my mind about anything, because at Days, it was “just a breakdown writer” that gave us some of the worst episodes I’ve ever seen. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy