Jump to content

General Hospital: August 2023 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Well, Jordan sticks out slightly less than old lady Molly, but that's the faintest of praise here.   Listen, I think TH is miscast and Jordan is a very dull, useless character.  I am not trying to change your mind about her.  I just don't see what you are seeing.   I think Portia is a much better character with a much better actress and the show just isn't utilizing her right.  BK/Portia have potential and I think Jordan is a dead end.  

I would assume by your username that you have good taste in GH characters, so we will have to agree to disagree on this one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 236
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Gh couples that work, and those that don't

The Good-

Sonny/Nina, Dante/Sam, Molly/TJ, Chase/Brook Lynn, Anna/Valentin, Michael/Willow, Cody/Sasha, Finn/Elizabeth, Mac/Felicia, Robert/Diane, Kevin/Laura, Martin/Lucy, Scott/Liesel

The Bad-

Ava/Austin, Alexis/Gregory, Ned/Olivia, Spencer/Trina, Drew/Carly, Dex/Josslyn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

All this talk about casting errors just reminds me that I think almost everything wrong with GH in the last couple of years has been on the production side. Poor casting decisions- a couple of good ones in there like Trina, Spencer, Esme (which I know not everyone agrees with) surrounded by miscasts like Jordan, Molly, the former OLTL folks, Gregory. Then we have stragglers with no real purpose just there. Followed by people like Nina who should have been gone ages ago.

I have thought many of the big stories sounded great on paper, and were then produced with a severe lacking of energy. So my complaint isn’t just the writing, although there are issues there. Poor Sasha, one character where that trauma could have been shared amongst many characters story wise to spew her being a tragedy all the time.

The show looks good but is lifeless, and I blame Frank for that.  The characters that naturally should be there are not like Jason (I agree with the reason SB is gone), Lucky, Lulu, hell even Serena. They have excellent players being wasted- Dante, Liz, Cameron (should have been locked down), Alexis, the list goes on. It’s ridiculous that we see Olivia more than Dante, and the show is clearly more invested in her. And I like Olivia just fine- she’s just not central and somehow 

I would love for some returns, but I think the garden needs serious tending before I would add more people.  We wasted serial killer Ryan without using him to thin the herd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I enjoyed Ava and Austin in February when they conspired to hide the "death" of Nikolas.  I like the dynamic when two smart, outcast, desperate, neer-do-wells team up in a scheme.

But, I'm still stuck on Roger Howarth from OLTL, so it is difficult not to think of him as having malicious intent as Austin.  For whatever reason, I can separate from Maura West from ATWT Carly, but Roger's role as Todd made such a strong impression, that I can't imagine him as a romantic, well-meaning, doctor.  I know he's played many other character since then, and it may be unfair, but he is typecast in my mind.

So, I am always waiting for the shoe to drop and Austin is found to be just as evil as his cousin.

@AbcNbc247 I enjoyed the pacing of this week, but I wonder if we'll begin to feel like the show is trading water within the next month or so if the scabs feel as if they aren't able to resolve any mysteries or begin any new plots until the strike is over?

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Maybe treading water in some storylines; the surrogate stuff immediately comes to mind when I think of that. 

But this arc that Valentin may be the one who burned down Anna’s house is actually kind of interesting. Idk if Chris/Dan would have done something like that if they were still writing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I know Passions used this trope with Ethan and Sam to drag out the paternity, but GH seems to speed through certain stories while dragging others.
    • For any other soap, I think I’d agree, but GH, I don’t know

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Agreed, that there was some strange choices in the episode, especially at the end, but overall, that was some great drama that opens up the potential for so much future storyline. Kat vs. Eva having the most potential, especially over Tomas. I have mixed feelings about Martin/BC though. I thought he did pretty well in scenes with Smitty/MM, but the scenes of him confronting Leslie and of him throwing the books were bad lol she acted circles around him.  It’s similar to what Harding Lemay said about George Reinholt at AW; he could be brilliant in one scene, but then mediocre in the next. 
    • I know some of y'all really like Brooke Kerr, and so I've tried to give her a shot, despite her frequent flat line readings and distracted "did I leave the front door unlocked?" facial expressions. But lord, she is so bad at playing a tough-talking badass that I was actually rooting for Brad today to spill the beans to Drew. 
    • Googling does tend to ruin it.  For those of us who were teens in the late 1970s and early 1980s, you can't imagine how much fun it was to watch the show in the afternoons.  (It came on right after school.)  There weren't any "spoilers" at the time.  We would always try to anticipate how each crime and each mystery would be resolved, and we were ALWAYS wrong, because the stories are filled with so many weird twists and turns.   The head writer (Henry Slesar) and his dialogue writer (Steve Lehrman) invariably toss genuine clues directly into your face in the most unlikely ways, but then they provide a host of "red herrings" to completely confuse you and send you off on the wrong path.  Once the story reaches its conclusion, all you can think is Why didn't I figure that out weeks ago?  lol
    • Does the vault have the original scene and not the short flashback?
    • I appreciate that you are using AI with the knowledge of it's limitations. Some posters take everything it produces as fact.
    • And of course Mama Ru herself appeared on All My Children.
    • The Saturday 8pm slot usually had the lowest rating of the NBC 4 sitcom lineup for some reason. NBC let Saturday night fizzle, They used 9.30 pm to launch 227 and Amen, both of which moved to earlier in the evening but they  kept Empty Nest following GG for several seasons.  Empty Nest should have moved to 8pm with their strongest new sitcom at 9.30, anticipating that GG would eventually falter. Instead they left them there and stretching the sitcom pool too thinly on other nights. When Grand talk over at 9.30 Thurs maybe Night Court and Wings could have been used on Saturday.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy