Jump to content

50TH DAYTIME EMMYS (2023) Any Guesses?


Joseph

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Melissa Claire Egan seems like a lock for Chelsea’s suicidal scenes on Y&R (and probably Jason Thompson getting another nod). Can’t say it wouldn’t be deserving looking at those scenes alone, even though the story hasn’t really lived up to its promise.

Nicholas Chavez (Spencer, GH) will probably repeat, as he’s had a lot of good work in the past year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Agreed With Both of YOU! I wonder if Amelia Heinle would get a Nod since she was pretty important last year, even if I can't think of any scenes in specific, maybe the Victoria/Ashland Break Up, I wish Sharon Case had better material last year, her richest moment was Rey's Death, but I don't think she got to do very much with that, Same with Michelle Stafford but I Think Susan Walters has A Chance, And Melissa Ordway, I guess she also had some Nod-Worthy Scenes this year.

On B&B, KKL might get a Nod as Supporting Actress for The Bridge Break Up, or stuff like that, Kimberlin Might also get a Nod, JMW obviously, Annika for her Confrotation With Thomas, Krista was a Good revelation! Unfortunately the men aren't as Rich my guess would either Tanner And Matthew getting nods

On DAYS AND GH, I DUNNO!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Remember that Younger Performer Age Guidelines are changing again this year to a max age of 18:

This was in 2021:

Younger Performer in defining Young Adult content and Younger Performer categories in other genres, the Daytime Emmys will be gradually changing the parameters for entry into this category. The current eligibility is for performers on a Drama Series who are under the age of 25. This will be the final year (2021) in which age 25 is the cut-off. Next year (2022) it will be lowered to 21 and for 2023, it will be lowered again to 18. Additionally, Younger Performer entrants are permitted to enter this category an infinite number of times while they are under 18, but once they turn 18, they are permitted to enter only three times before being moved to either Lead or Supporting. Being age-qualified to enter Younger does NOT mean an entrant is required to. Lead and Supporting acting categories are also open to performers under the age of 25.

 

https://theemmys.tv/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/daytime-emmys-whats-new-in-daytime.pdf

Edited by jcar03
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is the 2023 schedule ...

FEBRUARY 1 - Open for Submissions
FEBRUARY 21 - Open for Judging Sign Ups
FEBRUARY 28 - Early Entry Deadline
MARCH 7 - Final Entry Deadline
MARCH 20 - APRIL 10 - Judging
MID-APRIL - Nominations Announcement
MAY 1 - Gratis Credit Changes Deadline
JUNE 16 - Daytime Emmys Ceremony
JUNE 17 - Daytime Emmys Lifestyle & Creative Arts Ceremony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

From Y&R -- Melissa Claire Egan(Chelsea), Jason Thompson(Billy)

From DAYS -- Billy Flynn(Chad), Greg Vaughan(Eric), 

From GH -- Rebecca Herbst(Elizabeth), Cynthia Watros(Nina), Maura West(Ava), Nicholas Alexander Chavez(Spencer), Tabyana Ali(Trina), Brook Kerr(Portia),Jon Lindstrom (Kevin & Ryan), Allly Mills(Heather), Avery Pohl(Esme), maybe Maurice Benard(Sonny), Adam Huss(Nicholas), Laura Wright(Carly). 

Edited by David_Vickers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Your use of the word "apparently" would need to include a source. Just your use of the word doesn't make it true or valid. Where would you get the idea that something has happened if you hadn't already received an indication from somewhere else, specifically a valid source (including Tabyana herself)? By using the word "apparently," you are implying this was mentioned somewhere, either in a publication or similar.
    • I think Hotel would have the similar demos as Dynasty W 19-49 would have been strong. St Elsewhere survived b/c it attracted wealthier/urban viewers and The Equalizer was probably stronger with men and younger viewers. So each had their own niche-good counter-programming. As for Aaron Spelling's influence over ABC in terms of scheduling, I don't know if he would have been happy with Charlie's Angels moving to Sunday, The Colbys scheduled on Thursdays or Matt Houston moved to Fridays. I think he just had to roll with the punches.
    • Thank you @Broderick. That information was so helpful. I watched the first episode of the "Mansion of the Damned" storyline. I was extremely confused by Margaret Colin's Paige and her relationship to other characters. Your post helps me understand what's happening. The rest of the show was easy to understand and I'm enjoying it. Hunter's Nola is a good character for me since I know Kim Hunter from other work.  I must have seen clips of Edge of Night before because I remember seeing April. 
    • How is it back tracking when it was in fact the word I originally used? It's not.
    • You know what is a great way to stop these unclear "rumors"?  Just stop posting them and then back tracking with words like "apparently".   Anyhow, I didn't find the Tracy/Lois scenes as good as I hoped.    
    • Jason, in thinking this over, I realize that we look at this space, differently. To me it is a potentially collaborative space. Now that I've realized this, what I should have said, "I'm having a problem because what I'm seeing is not matching up with your descriptions. Maybe these files I just got are misdated. Maybe it's something else. I will keep you posted. Meanwhile this episode, its edit, is ready, even though I might have to issue a corrected date later. But, people can enjoy the performances now. 
    • Thank you for the constructive suggestion. 
    • But how is it "apparent" that she signed a new 3-year contract? Your wording had a voice of authority -- as if you knew it was true. A better way to post about it? Say you read online that she signed a new contract, but have no idea if that's true.
    • This interview actually reminds me a bit of Kim Zimmer’s press during the infamous clone storyline on Guiding Light, or Deidre Hall during the possession story on Days. All three were seasoned daytime veterans who made it clear they valued airtime for their characters, not just being part of a romantic pairing. It seems that idea was part of the pitch behind these bigger-than-life plots. They all took big swings in their performances. When I read Kim Zimmer’s memoir, I thought she captured it best — she wanted to be respected for being willing to take those risks. To paraphrase her, she knew it was ridiculous for Reva to think she was pregnant after menopause, but she still threw herself into those scenes and made them real. That’s what really struck me about Victoria Wyndham’s interview too. She responded like a real person. It felt like she was telling Michael Logan that she knew Justine — and a geriatric pregnancy with twins — was totally preposterous, but that she still deserved credit for trying to keep the show alive and entertain the audience. And honestly, I think that's more than fair. Logan is looking for a reductive answer for who is to blame.  And, she's telling him to accept that they were all well-meaning.  Which is not a defense of bad storytelling.  But, I understand that she's frustrated because she interpreted Logan's critique as a lack of commitment, and she wants him to know that she was committed! (maybe not for the best, but committed).
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy