Jump to content

Days: February 2023 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I liked that, too, and I have hated that they let Challie be so isolated that neither of them had anyone to talk to but Johnny or Alex. Allie needed to have Nicole to talk to in the past months & I thought we should see Allie talk to Nicole before leaving for New Zealand. But, very apparently the show did not keep up with that relationship. A pity. 

Nicole was good again today as a thinking human being, not just a bed warmer. Finally EJ is going to get onto Stefan drugging him & then it will really hit the fan. 

The show, in the Salem dimension, was good again today. We had the brothers, Eric & Brady, communicating again & today taking action, which they must have planned on yesterday's show. I'm not sure why they decided to tackle both the Rolf problem & the Stefan problem but it's welcome action. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 708
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I found the devil stuff way worse.  

Agree about Craig/Leo too.  The dead/not dead stuff isn't overtly offensive like that story was.  

It's just dumb.

And lol! I low key forgot Ron wrote the cryo crypt stuff with Lulu and the stuff with her embryos, but GH let him!  He also wrote the Lucy the vampire slayer stuff.  GH takes itself much more seriously and is much more grounded in reality, but some wacky things have happened in PC too.  There was an alien once lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, they are obviously two different shows, but as a GH fan I was never put off by Days silliness and I don't think it's jarring to watch both shows.   If anything it's much easier to watch Days because the characters are mostly the same and have been for decades lol.  GH has been great, but there are so many characters and so many of them are brand new with wacky backstories so I sometimes get confused if I miss episodes.  

Anyway, I do understand everyone's frustration with Days on here and most make valid points, but I just don't personally find it much worse than it has been for the last 20 years or so.  It has a lot of issues, but I don't find it boring and there have been plenty of regimes and writers that have made Days boring which I think is worse than ridiculous and improbable.  I don't think Ron is particularly good, but as I have said before I do think he has some good ideas.  The execution just fails more often than not.    I really think if Days could figure out how to edit/pace stories correctly it would seem so much better.  It feels like a shoestring budget show while GH still feels like a real production with money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

DAYS has never been a show I’ve loved, even though I watched (and was entertained by) the first Reilly era. Soaps already require a healthy bit of suspension of disbelief even when they are more grounded. Sci-fi/fantasy breaks the spell for me, especially when the sci-fi rules are so often inconsistently applied. It’s not like watching something like Doctor Who, which can be silly but is a contained story that breezes by in an hour and dazzles you enough with wit and cleverness that you don’t consider the logical inconsistencies. 

For me, RC lazily uses sci-fi as an out when he can’t come up with compelling story complications. Let’s have people run around in masks and pretend to be other people in order to break up couples instead of organic conflict rooted in story. Nothing is believable or worth getting invested in. And it doesn’t help that the show is so shoddily made.

Edited by Faulkner
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's true. And I don't have a problem with sci-fi on soaps in doses, or with craziness or camp. I've defended a lot of Ron's wilder stories on OLTL or GH (like the gay marriage fest on OLTL which was ahead of its time, or the 1968 time travel arc which was fun and above all short). But there has to be roots in character, and in rootable couples and their human motivations before the wilder storyline. That train left the station for Ron with most stories and characters years ago. These days he often just leans on the same bag of tricks, throws up his hands and waits for his longest-running stans to say 'it's just for fun, don't take it so seriously, it's a soap opera'. I say that a lot too! But not when everything is wall-to-wall masks or poorly handled rape or the Devil hopping 3 bodies in a week, or whatever else. That devalues the show and the genre. The key to doing weirder stories on soaps, be it sci-fi or horror or fantasy or whatever, is to ground it in character and stuff the audience already loves, believes and can buy into. DAYS doesn't do that much anymore.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My "rose" of the show from this week's episodes, (which were undeniably poor in terms of quality), is that unlike the past "wacky" plots, this week I appreciated the dynamic between the real and the absurd.  For example, the contrast between the cryo-pods and Anna's grief has grounded the drama in a way that was not as well balanced during the possession or the nu-Renee plots.

I realize that's not a strong defense, and I don't expect others to agree, but it was notable to me, so I wanted to share it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So much truth in that.

And Ron is not alone in this.

Evil twins, fake deaths,mind control etc all used to break up characters and create obstacles. So much easier than creating consistent characters whose personal flaws could be used to propel plots.

That's what old school writers had to do. It didn't always work of course but was far more believable and worth investing in.

The closest they got in those days were those ridiculous misunderstandings where one character assumed something and went off and got a divorce or had an affair when one simple conversation could have cleared things up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Lemme see if I follow ... is it the juxtaposition of "Caring Anna" making a traditional grief visit to a person in mourning with the other-worldly wacky techno-astronaut-like tubes? These are the choices we have: the one person who feels the need to reach out to Roman who she knows best of the 3 or a B-movie scifi lab probably hidden on a likely non-existing floor on the elevator? If so, I definitely get your drift & my reply, not to you, but to our higher soap power is why can't we ever have nice things?!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I just can't wait until next week when we can go back to a full weeks worth of episodes. 3 episodes and a mid-week gap has been so difficult to deal with, especially in light of how good the show is.
    • I always hoped they'd change Parker's paternity back to Phillip.  I guess it doesn't matter since Chloe is off the show currently.  I don't recall Holly or Maggie mentioning Parker, so it's not they are close to him. 
    • I’ve reached the summer of 1998.  Until now, my impression has been that the show has steadily improved since the great quality dip of 1994, reaching as high as 8/10 in 1997. Sure, I could complain about a few things in 1997 (Claudia got wasted after her initial storyline; Thorne’s feelings for Taylor were a bit too sudden; the storyline where Sheila lived with James and Maggie while pregnant got rather boring; Mike periodically revisiting Sheila despite being on the run from authorities), but overall it was a very strong year.  I liked the Thorne/Taylor/Ridge triangle, the mystery plot about who shot Grant, the sham wedding to trap Sheila, Stephanie/Eric/Lauren, and Clarke manipulating his way back to working at Forrester. I even liked the Greenland storyline with Eric/Lauren/Rush, although I had expected to hate it. Maybe 1996 tops 1997 in raw soapy excitement (especially as Sheila got a chance to interact with a larger canvas of characters), but certain problems with overall storyline cohesion puts it somewhat below 1997 for me. Unfortunately, 1998 has turned out to be a bit of a speedbump, perhaps on par with 1995 levels of quality: - Maggie’s character really got trashed after James left her to be with Sheila, and the early 1998 storylines where she imprisoned Sheila in the house from Psycho, or installed those wires and mikes and such in her house to make her think she’s going crazy, were total GARBAGE. So much so that the latter storyline (and Maggie with it) pretty much disappeared into a limbo.  - I have mixed feelings about the twins plotline with Lauren. No way did Rush survive being shot with a crossbow through the chest, and the romance between Lauren and Rush’s good twin brother Johnny was rather dry to me. I did however enjoy the camp aspect of Rush taking his brother’s place to be with Lauren, and Eric rescuing her. But it doesn’t appear like Bell cared too much about the Johnny/Lauren romance beyond the twin storyline gimmick, and it too disappeared in an unsatisfactory manner (come on, why not hire Johnny’s actor for just 5 more episodes for an arc where he realizes Lauren is not over Eric, or JUST SOMETHING?) - Clarke wormed his way back to FC in late 1997, which had exciting storytelling potential, but then he disappeared almost entirely. Sad to see my favorite character wasted in this manner. Does he get anything interesting to do between now and the Morgan saga of 2000-2001? - The Thomas saga was entertaining in 1997, but it got stretched out too much, and made some of early 1998 tiresome, with Ridge having to decide YET AGAIN which woman he wants to be with. On the plus side, I like the plotline of Thorne being neighbors with Macy and Grant, and we’ve finally been introduced to the SORASed Rick/Amber/CJ crowd. The Stephanie/James/Sheila triangle is also starting, and it makes me excited (I remember seeing some if it in my childhood). I know Sheila, Grant, and James are all leaving soon, which I honestly kind of dread - between them and Clarke’s near-absence, it feels like herd is going to get culled too much in the near future. But I know there’s the familiar 1999-2002 to look forward to.
    • LOL - this is a perfect description, and that's what I loved about it! May be a bit campy, but it immediately caught my attention in a good way.  I'm not familiar with the Fishing Trip storyline, I'll have to look that up. I've noticed that about Josh, which has made him less attractive to me overall. He just yells a lot when he's not happy. Wow, Reva was married to HB!  LOL - "Always... eventually, and again"
    • I love your ideas. I would love to see Jack grown up this confused unhinged individual. He should hold a grudge against both Brooke and Taylor.   
    • @chrisml

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Lois's return has been a bust. So disappointing that the writers have never written for her. As with Tracy, the pool of GH vets is so thin, there's no one to pair her with. Doubtful they would go to the trouble of properly recasting a legacy character and then sticking  him with Lois; they're obviously not that invested. If she wants to be on this show, it'll be as a noisy grandma who stays in the background. 
    • I love me some Anita and TT. They need to give her a good storyline and I know that it's coming. 
    • @Franko Thanks for tagging me. A few days ago I was talking in another thread about the rise of "snarky" critics for TV shows in the '90s online recaps, but this is just more along the lines of a mauling. There's also the unspoken reality that films like Steel Magnolias were seen as movies for women, so therefore they sucked. Pauline Kael also had her share of blunt, at times incredibly nasty remarks, but the vitriol is often balanced by her love for film. I'm not seeing that here.  With that said, the comment about Field's work becoming unbearable describes how I felt when I tried to sit through her and Maura Tierney on ER. 
    • I skipped most of Daniel too. I think it's awful he has kids with Nicole, Csrky5 and Chloe and Brady, Bo and Philip do not. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy