Jump to content

Amped-Up Comebacks


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Correct me if I'm wrong (which I might be) but I would nominate Marco Dane's 1992 return to GH.

Although, Gerald Anthony won an emmy on a strong initial story pairing with Tracy.  I recall an unseemly story where Marco was going to abscond with the funds from Lucy Coe's annual Nurse's Ball AIDS fundraiser.  It seemed irresponsible to take an event that meant to be GH's annual public service episode and pervert it with the story about stealing charitable funds.  (Here's where I am uncertain, if Marco wanted to steal the money, or was that someone else's scam?)

I would further argue that the Marco who showed up in Port Charles possessed all of the worst parts of the character that were derived from other's writers trying to make him a comedic figure.  Certainly, Marco had a wacky side, but he was so much more complex during his relationships with Karen and Katrina.  So, to write him as essentially a buffoon, or side kick to Luke and Sonny, robbed the 1992 audience of what made the character so revolutionary in the first place.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not to go off topic, but am I correct that someone tried to scam the Nurse's Ball charity?  I don't remember how that whole story got resolved

What I do remember is that Marco was involved with Sonny during his strip club days and that there had been no character development, or call back to prior events, in his treatment of Karen Wexler versus his treatment of Tina

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I should have been clearer with my intent with this thread. I intended it to be about actors who noticably overacted (or to be charitable, added extra flourishes) upon their returns. There's been some good examples throughout the thread, but your mentioning Marco stands out because Gerald Anthony was specifically called out by Michael Logan in 1992. Something along the lines of Gerald's talent being undeniable, but that this time around, he was coming across as subtle as Jackie Gleason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

How are we defining amped up?

re: Robin Strasser, whose mid-‘90s Dorian is perhaps my all-time favorite portrait of a soap character from the acting to the look… I noticed that she was suddenly inexplicably playing to the cheap seats and I did not care for it. On her hotline, she mentioned that she NEVER watched herself but did end up catching herself on the air and felt like she was underplaying, not doing enough. Dommage. That’s when she started amping it up and the character was never the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Brenda Dickson - Although on her intial return to Y&R she was mostly the same with some over the top moments, as time went on she started overplaying more and more and by her last year it was ridiculous. The definition of playing to the cheap seats. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

@DRW50has mentioned this lately, but I've talked about it a lot as well. As Robin has said more than once, her forced exit by JFP rattled her terribly and made her intent on 'upping her game'. I heard that and it made a lot of sense to me re: what had happened to her work while the show was still on the air. I think the exile hurt her a lot and I personally don't think she ever recovered performance-wise; I think she felt she always had to go to the limit or very big most of the time in order to prove her worth to the show and the network.

OTT Robin Strasser is still great, of course. I would never begrudge her coming back. But yes, I think she had less and less quiet moments and stillness once she returned in 2003.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I admit I am curious about amped up as well when we mean amped comebacks. Does it mean that we are referencing returns that are just as good as the first run or just returns where they came with a lot of thunder regardless of how it turned out.

 

Because for the former, I naturally have to mention Vanessa Marcil's as Brenda to GH the first time. And how well done I remember it being and how it touched on so many people in her short period. Of course, I could also mention her third return (and the advertising surrounding it) for the latter.

 

Or something like Sydney Penny's Julia's return to AMC. That got some good advertising from what I recall as well...coming back to find Noah's killer.

 

And speaking of Michelle Stafford...her return as a tech whiz, Jack's new love interest, and behind the Jabot Glow by Jabot, mentoring young vixen Brittany. 

 

I love that someone already mentioned it, but H#LL TO THE YES to Eileen Davidson's first return to DAYS...a decade in the making...like VM's Brenda on GH...and that lived up to the potential from the moment, her head tilted upward in that hat right up until her destroyed wedding (honorable mention to the stopped first wedding) to Brady leading to where it should lead...a final showdown with Marlena. 

 

And H#LL TO THE YES PART 2 on Eileen Davidson's return to Y&R. I was not even watching when she was Ashley in her first run. But I knew of it, saw the remsemblance with BE, and knew her from DAYS. So when she came out of the shadows to Rafael...it was kinda of a wink to the gothic-ness of Kristen Dimera, but her presence of elegance was also apparent for who Ashley is. I was in awe. 

 

I also lived for Princess Tina on OLTL...even if the road to her getting to have scenes with the people she should have scenes (and Cord) was a long road to get to, but never toooo boring...but worth it for me. 

Edited by Taoboi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was going to say Vanessa's first return as well, but I wasn't sure if it counted.  I am not sure Vanessa amped up anything as far as her acting, but definitely her style, presence, and overall writing helped as well.  But I would definitely say she lived up to her own hype in that run.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Yes, of course, all of those servants added to the overall picture at AW & also people had relationships with those servants! I like it when Anita asks after one of the servants at the club, how their children are doing & like that. 
    • Great scenes between Marlena and EJ today. Paula and Jeanne are making EJ have more depth than Ron had during his long drawn out tenure.
    • Might as well say it, Minority opinion, granted, but I like Joss & I'm okay with this WSB story & i hope that Emma will be their next recruit & she & Joss can be partners.
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven  The Arlene/Ben/Betsy triangle is one I wish I could see for myself as on paper it doesn't tend to excite me but I can see how well-constructed it was. I wish I could see the Rick/Meg relationship too, although I wish they'd had him genuinely fall for Meg after he gets together with Cal. The whole Brooke/Deacon/Bridget story on B&B was horribly damaging to Brooke as a character but it was dramatically very sound because I could completely believe Deacon would fall for messy and vulnerable Brooke after finally settling down with the more docile Bridget.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • According to the head writer list, it seems the show may have started to fall apart while either the Schneiders or Upton were writing.  And when it started to crumble, it crumbled fast.  It was sad to see everything Labine had brought to LOL be disassembled.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Abraham!!!!!

      Please register in order to view this content

      Welcome back!!! And I see Abe and Paulina got a new apartment too, which is just a redress of John/Marlena’s, Steve/Kayla’s, etc. But it looks kinda nice. And I enjoyed his scenes with Chanel. It added another perspective to everything that’s been going on with her and Johnny. And Abe using his own history with Lexie to comfort Chanel was a good idea. Plus, it also provided us with more suspicion/red herring about Johnny possibly shooting EJ. I’m looking forward to see what happens between her and Johnny. And I’m so glad that the two of them are on the frontburner now.  Speaking of Johnny, I still have no problem with him going to work for Titan. The drama could be so good, especially once EJ finds out. To me, it seems like another realistic reaction to everything that’s been happening to Johnny lately. It doesn’t seem random and over the top either. And I like that they remembered to have Johnny tell Xander that he has no corporate experience whatsoever. Surprisingly, the two of them work well together. And so do Carson and Deidre. I love how the Marlena/Johnny relationship has been featured so much.  Kayla was still strong and kicking ass today too. The writer change has helped her/Mary Beth so much. But I do admit we should’ve seen Steve trying to get into Dr. Russell’s lab rather than Kayla instructing him over the phone.  And unfortunately, Chad and Cat still don’t seem to be doing much for me though. The cliffhanger was ok too.   Btw, Days was trending at #4 this morning on Peacock
    • There was a huge outcry when we learned that JFP intended to off Donna.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy