Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

I thought of this topic with the news of Ingo Rademacher being fired from GH. It's amazing he lasted so long on the show, being so deeply tied to Brenda and ultimately being her second choice.

Nicole on DAYS has been on the show on and off since 1998. She started out as a generic Titan model and became so much more.

  • Replies 160
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Webmaster
Posted

Might be a little controversial, but I'd say pretty much any character on soaps. I'm of the opinion that no character/actor should have a lifelong job or storyline on soaps. It's nothing personal against anyone but a lot of times you find that the show struggles to write something new or fresh for characters that have been on forever. While you can always come up with something for them to do it's not easy to create long lost children, supposed childhood experiences, friendships or exes out of thin air when viewers have watched many of these characters on the show for decades, and still make the storyline beats believable -- if that's even the intent. 

  • Members
Posted

I don’t disagree.  I think they have lost their way over the last few decades of letting the characters mature or fade away if there is no longer a story to tell.

Look at someone like Alice Horton.  She didn’t often have a story, but she added a lot to the show over the years and had a point of view and important place.  Now compare her to someone like Marlena- while I think Tomlin was using her well with Will and Sonny, I don’t think she and John should be in these action adventure stories they keep putting them in.  Doesn’t mean they can’t have a place, but to try to have them be front burner for 40 years is not feasible.  But they haven’t developed/invested the next generations enough to let them take over their natural place.

  • Members
Posted

have to agree in general.

Watching Y&R and seeing storylines created just to serve vet characters even if logic and past experiences get thrown out the window.

Most characters can stand 10-15 years as frontburner at which point they have to take a back seat or be dropped altogether.

It's great to see Jack Abbott onscreen after all these years but 3 days a week is not necessary. If the shows were structured properly, he would be the patriach at work and home to family and employees, not mooning after his twice ex wife who has betrayed him multiple times.

By choice/necessity Bill Bell revamped Y&R after several years and gave the show new life. It's a pity he didn't follow through in the 90's and introduce a viable set of new characters and drop some others along the way.

  • Members
Posted (edited)

I would add Y&R's Michael Baldwin to this list.  Someone recently posted that it will be 30 years since he was introduced.  I could not have predicted after his introductory story as sexual harasser turned rapist that Michael would have not only gotten more airtime than Cricket in the last decade, but would also get an entire family built around him, and a romantic partner.

Helena Cassadine (GH) started as stunt casting for L&L's wedding, but she has driven story since the late 1990s

Abe Carver (DAYS), Abe's been backburnered so many times that the actor left the show at one point and nobody noticed.  However, looking back from the Reilly years to today he has been a part of most major stories.

Honorable mention to Marlena Evans (DAYS), in a show where families dominate the town we've only met her kids (and briefly her sister Samantha and niece Trista).  She is an honorary Brady, but there's never been a family built around Marlena.  Coupled with the fact that the actress has been fired for being too expensive and the character killed half the town at one point, it is an unexpected trajectory that she would still be a leading lady in 2020.

Edited by j swift
  • Members
Posted

Think about if they had let that next generation of Abbott’s and Newman’s actually age and have the correct storyline trajectory.  I think there is years of story with Victoria (I’m talking back in the day, when HT was still there) slowly taking over her father’s business and he has decided to just be married to Nikki and enjoy his life.  And he hates it.  But he can’t get back into power at Newman.  So he starts from scratch again.  You get to introduce new characters to set up his new venture, he gets to squabble with Jabot and Newman a little.  Nikki has an in character reason to be upset and turn to let’s say Jack- because she finally had victor’s full attention and he has told her (bluntly as he would) that she is not enough.

Told correctly that could be five years of story where everyone grows, and we slowly pull Victor away from everything having to revolve around him.

Look at trying to keep Nicolas and Sharon young by killing Cassie and the other stories they have been through in the last 20 years.  Same with Hope on DAYS- they have been stuck and the shows just keep putting them in stories like they are still 30.

  • Members
Posted

I am shocked people are saying Marlena.  She is Days to me and deserves silly front burner stories.  I would rather watch her and John over 90% of the cast.  I do agree they haven't built up the next generation well, but I don't think Marlena has ever outlived her usefulness.  She carried Days for 20 plus years.

If we are talking about Days characters that have outlived their usefulness I would nominate Kate, Roman, and Victor.  All amazing characters in their day, but nothing anymore.

I would agree GH owns this thread.  I would nominate Jax first, but Sonny also comes to mind.  He just created a slightly better trajectory for the character with the Carly pairing.

  • Members
Posted

People have been talking shít to me for 15 years for saying Kate is Played Out. She was played out by 2005! I think people just loved Lauren Koslow. Yet she somehow has boomeranged back around, I guess, bc she's still fun and I can think of people I'd much sooner cut than Kate today. Go figure. I do think she is used as a mattress too often.

  • Members
Posted (edited)

@carolineg To be fair, the topic is characters that we're surprised lasted, not character that are useless.  As for Marlena, you'd have to agree that she is an outlier on a soap that values youth.  I mean how many other great-grandmothers are still driving stories in daytime?  From my point of view that defines "surprising"

Edited by j swift
  • Members
Posted

I love Lauren Koslow and she is amazing, but Kate is not a character that should still be so prevalent.  Especially in the way they use her as the town welcoming committee for young guys.  It's so not the character Kate should even be.

 

Fair.  But Marlena was pretty popular from the jump and practically help create the Brady's so I am not shocked. I 100% get your point, but I think it's just a newly created character that became a legend.  And also what other great-grandma is as cool as Marlena?

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Maree Cheatham     pg. 403

      Please register in order to view this content

            MATLOCK Sister Peggy (1) 2025   Ray Wise    pg. 428 movie THE WOLF IN THE WELL    Roland Carmel    2024 THE NAPA BOYS    Officer Toland   2025   PodCast HAVOC TOWN      Josiah Abbess       2025    
    • Vernon is an idiot. Why would he have Sharon in the same hotel that Leslie is staying at?
    • Yes, that out of the blue return was odd. Maybe GG found a forgotten clause in the contract he signed when he was wooed to ABC and they were forced to take him back! Like George Reinholt he talked about the contract that promised him primetime roles. But it was loaded in the networks favor. I think it was Gloria Loring that re-signed at Days on the promise of primetime opportunities, but that was all it was- she was put up for guest spots and TV movies but not necessarily guaranteed that she get the role.
    • I still am baffled by why Monty brought back stunt hire Gerald Gordon in the early '80s out of nowhere for like a year. I haven't found anyone who can come up with a thing he did in that second stint of note.
    • It's interesting to watch this having watched The Doctors. I'm not sure I'm seeing that much of a difference in the characters Gerald Gordon and Anna Stuart played on The Doctors and what they're playing here.
    • I keep forgetting a huge chunk of that year was written by scabs. You're probably right, because by the time the strike was over, they were likely planning an exit for Alan's character as it must have been obvious by then that Bernau was not going to return. If he was still there, it's also doubtful they would have approached MZ and MG about coming back. Wild.
    • And to think the original plan was for David and Lesley to have an affair.  Not only would that have made no sense - Lesley wasn't THAT stupid, lol - but it also would've ruined her and GH.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Week ending March 5 1978 Second season shows are tested CBS finishes first week in March with stronger than usual 1 9.5, but not enough to beat ABC The prime -time ratings pattern continued to hold steady for the week ended March 5, and attention increasingly turns to second season entries as the networks probe one another's weaknesses or cover their own. As usual, ABC -TV won the week, scoring a 20.5 average rating. But CBS -TV was closer than usual with a 19.5 average garnered with the help of several strong specials and movies in addition to some of its dependable series regulars. NBC followed its habit of plummeting when its "évent "entries failed. In this case it was the miniseries, Loose Change, which scored only 24 and 22 shares on Monday and Tuesday, leaving the network with a 16.9 average rating for the week. Looking at new series and new time slots, ABC's Six Million Dollar Man on Monday (8 -9 p.m. NYT) continued to falter with a 22 share, while What's Happening, in its new slot on Saturday (8 -9 p.m.), also remained shaky with a 23 share. Starsky and Hutch is still healthy with a 38 share in its new slot following Charlie's Angels on Wednesday, and How the West Was Won also had a 38 on Sunday (8 -9 p.m.). Against West CBS's Rhoda and On Our Own came in poorly for the second week in a row of face to face competition, with each pulling 25 shares after a 41 share lead in from 60 Minutes. ABC's special two -hour presentation of the upcoming series tryout, Having Babies, scored a 27 share on Friday (9 -11 p.m.) against strong competition from both the other networks (the movie "Ski Lift to Death" on CBS and Rockford Files and Quincy on NBC). For CBS, its new Monday night leadoffs, Good Times and Baby I'm Back, scored so -so 27 and 28 shares respectively. But the second half of the night had its best performance since the new line -up came in- M *A*S *Hwith a 45, One Day at a Time with a 41 and Lou Grant with a 36. Celebrity Challenge of the Sexes and Shields and Yarnell showed no signs of reviving on Tuesday, with 16 shares each, but the new Tuesday movie slot held up with a 41 share from Clint Eastwood's "Magnum Force." The network's entire Saturday line up continued to limp in, as Bob Newhart Tony Randall, The Jeffersons, Maude and Kojak all scored sub 30 shares (with the exception of Newhart's 29, in fact, all scored sub -25 shares). NBC premiered its new Chuck Barris Rah Rah Show on Tuesday (8 -9 p.m.),when it pulled a 24 share. The second episode of Quark had a 27, three points down from its premiere. There might be the temptation to conclude that the 29 share turned in by the National Love, Sex and Marriage Test on Sunday (9:30 -10 p.m.) proves the appetite for "sophisticated" subject matter is not insatiable after all, except that its competition was not only CBS's strong comedy block but also ABC's rerun of "The Way We Were," which pulled a 35 share. Of NBC's other midseason entries -CPO Sharkey, Black Sheep Squadron, James at 16 and Class of '65 -CPO Sharkey turned in the highest score of the week, a 27.   *NBC were in dire straits at this point relying on movies and specials which could hit or bomb in equal measure.  Fred Silverman had his work cut out for him when he arrived that Summer. He favored sitcoms and series as the schedule's foundation and NBC had no sitcoms to build on and few solid series. He also had a big backlog of specials/mini series that had been committed to air. Also NBC had a long standing relationship with Universal so he was forced to work with that studio. He struggled to get quality producers on board as they were either tied into deals with ABC/CBS or were wary of having their shows on the 3rd rated network. He still felt variety had a place on the schedule however and that lead to duds like Susan Anton, The Big Show and Pink Lady and Jeff.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy