Jump to content

Y&R July 2021 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

This show had, what, seven months to come up with some conflict for the Abby story, and this is the best they could muster?

At least they seem to be making good on a Victor connection to the Amanda story, but they’ve already botched it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 121
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Instead of marrying Abby and Chance off so quickly and diving into the surrogacy plot, why not bring Stitch back earlier and provide some conflict as to whether Abby and Chance would make it.

Or delay the wedding because Chance has to take off and instead of everyone falling at his feet and proclaiming him the hero, Abby could be pissed and turn to Stitch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Heck, if they still wanted him to be the hero, they can combine the story they seem to hint at where Stitch is up to no good and have Chance "rescue" Abby if/when she gets in too deep.

Not that I'd be fascinated by that story either but at least it would be a full-fledged narrative. I have given them plenty of charitable patience that what happened with Chance and having to write him out was a last-minute call they needed a bit of time to pivot from. But boy it has been MONTHS. They should have found a more solid storyline by now and dare I say that considering how fraught and convoluted the whole surrogacy story could be on paper - with lots of potential organic drama between the characters - choosing to paint it as a tedious lovefest and instead bringing a villain ex machina to be the conflict is dumb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And I still can’t get past the “Mariah hasn’t texted” crap — as if any sane person would just text and not make phone calls.

And yes, I know that today they said they left voicemails, but my point is that they should have been mega-concerned before this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Another on going pet peeve for me is the uneccessary and blatant depiction of mega wealth and privelege when nothing about the production or visuals  supports this. In a lot of instances no mention needs to be made at all but it seems we are supposed to be impressed as if by saying it, then it is believable.

Usually it garners an eye roll.

In recent eps

'Summer can say at the company apartment apartment in Milan' Why not just say that Marcetti has arranged an apartment for her?

'Ask MD has had 10 million hits' Just say Ask MD is gaining traction. Have we ever seen Nathan do anything for that website?

'Summer has been offered the Creative Director at Angelina Marcetti, a top Italian Design firm' Much more believable if the said she'd been offered a position at Marcetti an up and coming label.

'Thanks for organising the Jabot Jet' Just booking a private jet would be more believable and socially responsible.Or better yet,just travelling business class, Or say nothing at all.

Anyone else annoyed by this or other examples?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Of course, Tessa is a fantastically successful musician and Fenmore's has branches all over the world.

Change of topic...

How would you feel about the Ashland character coming on instead as Brooks Prentiss? 

Most of the story could play as is and we might get Janice Lynde as Leslie to appear. Victor would have more at stake due to his past history with Lorie and Prentiss Industries. They could say that Lance has died.

A great way to tie past to present.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree on all of this, Paul. If the overall writing was good, or even better, I would ignore some of these things. It’s not, though, so the talk about wealth that we never see stands out.

I hated it when they said Summer would be Creative Director. I mean, come ON. Tara has a shoe line? We’ve never seen even ONE thing that would make that believable. There’s not even a fake portfolio that she carries around.

Billy and Lilly’s new place is embarrassingly tight with an efficiency apt. kitchen. The ranch set is too small. I hope they’re done with Adam’s penthouse, because that place is ragged.

Nick had a big new place, but we haven’t seen it in forever. Since Ashland is moving in with Billy, will he be happy in her cramped dollhouse? Amanda and Phyllis stay in the hotel from Blandsville. Lauren and Michael have no home and no offices, so they hold all their meetings at Society or in the lobby at the GP. Just UGH to all of it.

I hate the Chancellor Park set, where kids apparently play and rough-house a few feet from sidewalks and concrete benches. 
 

The Chancellor living room will forever be underwhelming and a reminder of what it used to be. ChanceComm is now a tiny shell of what Dark Horse was. Devon’s workplace? The billionaire has none. Remember his office, or even years ago when he had a recording studio for 5 minutes?

And how about Victoria and Ashland streaming their merger — from her office laptop. She had a frickin ring light. Wow. 
 

But even though Ashland has a media company, there was NO tech support there — no one for set-up, no one with cue cards, no one for emergencies. So we got a merger of companies worth hundreds of billions streaming sh it like this???

Every episode is another day of multiple examples of this crap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Their new place is just a slightly re-designed working of Phyllis' old apartment that she shared with Billy. I would've preferred the one used right before the last one (from when Michelle Stafford was in the role and housing Daisy).

I miss Nick's set. I loved how it looked and felt. The attempt at making the Grand Phoenix the new GCAC is backfiring, because it does not house the same feeling. You have ONE seating area, while the GCAC had several tables. It's a missed mark.

The original remodel of the Ranch was quite nice. Shame they don't use it any longer.

The original Dark Horse offices were very architechual, in my opinion, and to see them diminished like they are is disappointing. It's clear Anthony Morina and Josh Griffith are using their budget to pay for actors they could probably cut and bring back greater production value.

I don't hate the Chancellor set as much as I feel like I should; changing the view of which we see the room, for me, made it feel bigger and more spacious than it felt in the final years the front-on view was available to us. I'm just happy the Abbott living room hasn't been dismantled into nothing like it could have been.

It gives me this kind of vibe from Victoria:

Please register in order to view this content

Hate to say it... but the casting for Tessa is wrong for me. I would've cast someone else in the role, and really dug into developing the role... because, I feel like her origins are just ignored now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What’s the point of Nikki right now? She’s the matriarch of the show’s leading dynasty, which actually has big story, and she’s basically “the help.”

We see MTS quite a bit; they just aren’t giving her anything substantial to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Is Camryn Grimes on leave? Is that why we don’t see Mariah squirming, bound and gagged or tied to some bed with Stitch as her masked caretaker, in some abandoned cabin somewhere? JG might be overestimating how much we’re invested in these “reveals.” He’d be better off showing his hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

      Why didn't Steve respect Monica and Jeff's decision?  I get he's Jeff's father, and that's how it came out, but I don't like the ethics of the story. A stranger gets to make life or death decisions over a wife's demands?   I hope Monica secretly never forgave Steve's chauvinism.
    • Question: Jon-Michael Reed's review of 1977 is up in the retro soap section.  It includes a fleeting reference to comedic scenes between Jeanne Cooper and Julianna McCarthy regarding “Kay's would-be beau, Ralph the Plumber”.  Could someone please fill me in will more details? I forgot that Kay and Liz were friendly before Jill stole Kay's husband.  And the thought of Liz playing a comedic scene blows my mind, because I only recall her being dour both in demeanor and wardrobe.  
    • I said on Twitter on Friday when Leslie mentioned Chicago that perhaps she might be related to one of Anita's bandmates. Since we hardly know anything about Leslie's childhood background. In addition, Leslie said she grew up listening to The Articulettes….
    • There was a scene in the past week or two with Leslie looking at some papers and mementos, which included an invitation or souvenir from Alan's memorial service or funeral -- it was dated as November 2024. Me just guessing but it seems to me that Martin's nightmares about the accident are from something longer ago than November.
    • ah thanks! do you know who the third one was in the blonde? the fifth one i know ive seen before in the brown wig but i forgot, and then ive never seen the psychic one before lol
    • I felt for Ted early on but as the story unfolded it has changed my opinion on him. To know he was cheating while his wife was struggling to give him a baby is a lot to deal with. Plus, this happened ages ago and still he's paying Leslie off and threatening her to leave town.  What really caused me to lose him in this episode was how even though he was busted, he still refused to take responsibility and come clean and the way he talked to Martin and Eva was terrible. To tell Smitty he better get Martin away from him when that is his SON who he used to cover up his affair? That is true dog behavior. Ted seems upset he got caught but I'm not seeing the remorse I would need to want Nicole to forgive him. I'm curious how I'll feel after Ted gets to talk to Nicole but I need him to fix it with the rest of the family as well.
    • I'm sorry. I well remember Jake doing Doris but I have no independent memory of the story around it.  Krystle with a K Lake, sure, both Tony the Tuna stories & NOT.  And, Jake also impersonated a woman named Bunny Eberhardt but he didn't know she was a woman so there was no drag. This weekend I re-watched Kevin & Mac, GH, and my strong impression is exactly what it was when I watched it in real time: They did not let them look very pretty. Of course, I think the best ever drag on GH was Alexis posing as the Q butler.  In a different use of drag at AW one Halloween, Jensen Buchanan went as Charlie Chaplin & Judi Evans went as, I think, a male gypsy.   

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I'm not sure who wanted them to dump REUNION & instead do a "Dallas-like daytime show" but it seems that it def came from NBC to AW through Rauch, so, yes, it absolutely could have been his (cough-another-stupid?) decision!!!! I've just begun the new Lisanti book so maybe I will find out. (I waited for the kindle version to come out.) I would apologize for being so critical & so sarcastic, too, but, well, I'm not actually sorry!  Silverman was NOT a friend to AW.  And, I believe the critique is on point & deserved! I wanted to explain why I think the timing is off for the 90 minute show to be a reaction to the GH Luke & Laura story & its hype. Because, for sure, networks & production companies did react to it! The first 90 minute show was Monday, March 5, 1979.  And, there was some unknown amount of time ahead of that with people arguing about it & then, planning it.  The Luke & Laura wedding was mid-November 1981.  They were on the run from Frank Smith & stayed overnight in Wyndham's Dept. Store early August 1980. 
    • terrible at using forums and inserting photos, but jake in another world had a drag persona named doris, anyone know the episode or year? http://www.anotherworldhomepage.com/ffad19.jpg
    • Yes, I am familiar with Fred Silverman. Agree, the 90 minute AW a very poor decision by Silverman. I think Silverman was behind the decision to go with Texas.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy