Jump to content

LATEST RATINGS: May 18-22, 2020


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members


If they rush back into production and treat it as “business as usual” then I think those viewers are gone. Instead, I’d plot season premieres for the shows, PROMOTE their returns and make an event out of it. If they come back with the same ole then they’re screwing themselves. Plus I would just film as much as I can and try to get at least 2-3 months ahead just in case we have to shut down again. I wouldn’t go back to air with 2-3 weeks in the can. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree with you on this. If they think they can just pick up whenever production starts rolling and start airing when they have episodes ready and expect those that have already tuned out to come back without doing some major promo - it's just not going to happen.  

Definitely worrisome. I will say that unlike during O.J. viewers are aware that there is a hiatus of sorts and that soaps are airing repeats and that there's going to be an extended break. While during, O.J. the impression I've gotten from reading about its impact on soaps and from that documentary on ABC is that viewers just didn't know when to tune in, whether their show would get preempted that day and if they did know their show would often be scheduled at some odd hour in the middle of the night so they had to program their vcrs. I wonder if those viewers lost all those stories that were played out those months since it seems like networks were still trying to air the soaps just not at very convenient times. 

Edited by GLATWT88
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The big thing with OJ wasn’t just the daily disruption.  It was that an entire new kind of programming replaced it and was also airing 5 days a week.  Never before had cable or a 24 hour news cycle done so much to disrupt viewing habits.

 

Talk shows got more lurid and trashy.  Court TV covered real life crimes all day long.  The Real World was really taking off on MTV, where young viewers were getting their soap fix with what would become kind of a template for modern reality tv.  OJ leads into the Jenny Jones crime and trials, followed quickly by President Clinton on television saying he did not have sexual relations with that woman.

 

Now the question to me is if these folks won’t come back because they finally broke the habit, not so much have discovered all this new content which isn’t as big a revolution as it was then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Right, I feel like the OJ Simpson trial was a catalyst for the decline of soap opera viewers. While some soaps had witnessed declines in viewership in the early 90s, the declines were modest. On the other hand, some soaps actually had grown or shown stable viewership, such as AMC, BB and Y&R. Decline in viewership at the time also correlates to the decline in the traditional audience (housewives) as younger women were forgoing  traditional roles and joining the ever expanding married female workforce (similarly, single parent households increased and both parents working increased during the same time and continue to do so). It's not surprising daytime court shows also increased post-OJ, Judge Judy being a big one that premiered in 1996. The landscape of daytime also made changes in the late 80s and 90s which were already reflecting the desire for "realtiy" with sensational talk shows popping up across the networks and growing throughout most of the 90s. While traditional viewership for soaps were slightly down pre-OJ there's no real way to know how many people were still recording their soaps - there's some information floating around but no concrete data that would help understand what viewership was like and part of it stems from networks not being concerned with VCR viewership because most viewers weren't viewing commercials anyway. Also, the increase of cable in households and the increase of original programming on cable also dipped into soap viewership. One of my other theories is that when soaps started targeting younger demos they ended up neglecting their core, older audience. That's the audience who eventually passes down soap viewing to the younger generations. When I was reading everyone's response on how they got into soaps, the overwhelming majority said they started watching with mom or another family member(s).

 

While I believe that daytime soap operas would have experienced decreased viewership regardless, I believe the OJ trial definitely expedited that decrease and forced away many viewers. Bad choices to bring younger viewers after the declines then drove away dedicated viewers. With the growth in cable programming, and now streaming programming, changing work habits, internet, smartphones, a decline was inevitable. Look at primetime ratings for the same networks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

July/August. Once California gives them the go ahead they’ll have to find out what actors are willing to work and who they can’t use. Plus they’ll have to reassemble the writing staff and write new or edited scripts and also they’ll have to clean the studio and those old sets. It won’t be an easy undertaking. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think this could be the end.  Y&R got renewed for a few years but I don't think viewers will be back after this.  I'm shocked at how well Y&R is doing with the younger demo with repeats.  It doesn't make logical sense.  

Wouldn't the writers just keep writing anyway?  Do they actually go to the studio anyway or do they work virtually?  I'd think they'd be working from home alot anyway.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • He needs to cheat on hubby!   Leslie continues to entertain.   Love, Shanice!!   Tracy knows Anita's secret.   Next week's preview has me anxious for Monday.
    • I thought of you when I saw her boobs had returned.

      Please register in order to view this content

      Another great episode by the new writing team.
    • -- Leslie's "Miss Bitch to you" comment was priceless, but let's not forget the good moment when Ted called her a bitch. -- I like nuTed as a counterpoint to Leslie. I don't need someone who comes off as a killer every time they meet. Nicole would not have married -- or lasted -- with that kind of guy.  -- And honestly, I never thought former Ted was close to wanting to Kill Leslie, either. -- Vanessa has become obnoxious to me. Her lecture and attack on Ted was ludicrously hypocritical. The biggest slut in town weighing in on cheating in a marriage? Spare me. -- Joey and Vanessa are going to have sex on the table in his casino backroom? So romantic, Vanessa. Just what you want in another guy. Spare me. -- Good Anita/Tracy scenes, but we need to move past scenes in which details aren't given about "what happened." It's not realistic that they'd keep having conversations and never get down to specifics. -- The previews for next week look insanely good.
    • BTG: - Sonia Blangiardo-Goins first listed as Director on May 23
    • Ciara/Victoria usually wears Free People, Revolve, or Aritizia, which is expensive, but mid tier. Most of the girls on the show wear the same brands.  You can find it cheap at Nordstrom rack.  Like the John Varvatos jackets that every guy wears lol. I do retail for a living so I have a bit of knowledge on this.  The prices the Worn on TV shows aren't real.  It's just the original retail price.
    • Ah, gotcha Ciara with an I not Ceara with an E. Also, according to the shopping site, Sami's outfit was pricey because it was the jacket from one suit, and the pants from another.  Can you imagine anyone wearing that awful green tweed from head to toe?  This is one time that costuming did a character a solid and broke up that pattern.
    • Aqua is an in house brand for Bloomingdales.  It's not terribly pricey, but not cheap. $150 for dresses.
    • Also, just checked, Hope was wearing Alice + Olivia ($595) and Sami wore a more shocking green, and it was by Aqua (price not indicated)
    • CIARA's outfit would have been fine if the cameraman wasn't literally filming down her shirt.  You could see Victoria's bra and boobs for at least half the episode lol.
    • Also, I'm giving Hope's Chanel jacket and Ceara's leather pants a pass, because I don't think they knew that they would wind up in Salem today when they got dressed.  So, there's been no time/opportunity to change outfits. Although

      Please register in order to view this content

      it reminded me that Sami and Hope seemed to have both shopped at a Chanel-knockoff outlet recently.  And if Hope, Ceara, and Bo suddenly have a change of clothes next week, I'm gonna need a throwaway line about how Hope raided Aunt Maggie's closet because of all that shopping she's been doing with Julie. Yep, it must be why they so rarely show flashbacks of the whole wedding party. Caroline looks like Kate 1.0
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy