Jump to content

15? 30? 45? 60? 90? Which is the best and worst runtime for soaps?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Soaps are the one of the few mediums which have shifted and morphed in their time-slots throughout their history.

Which runtime do you think serves soaps best...and worst? 

 

Best: 30 minutes. Tight, succinct episodes told in three to five acts, depending on the writer. Soaps seemed to thrive in the half-hour format as pioneered by ATWT

Worst: 60 minutes. Way too much fat. Bloated casts. Shows burned through storyline with such gusto they ate themselves.  I think the only soap which did the hour well was Y&R because they seemed to treat it as two half-hour episodes. You had to watch because you never knew who might pop-up at the half-way mark! 

 

Honorable mention: 12.5 minutes. BBC Radio 4's The Archers packs a huge wallop with character development, tight stories, and large casts into a 12.5 minute soap. AND the episodes are engaging!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 28
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Best. 30. I'm also very fond of 15 as that means truly tight focus. 

 

Worst. 90. Unless you enjoy seeing Beverlee McKinsey vamp over a phone for 3 minutes, which, admittedly, is not a bad way to spend your time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The half-hour, for sure. The full slate of soaps ran at 30 minutes each from 1968 to 1975, and the genre just shot up in popularity during this time. You could finally tell more than one story in-depth and develop characters beyond one central family/group, but the focus remained squarely on that central group, making it harder to completely move away from the core.

 

The hour experiment made sense as soaps kept gaining popularity, but once they started to expand, their respective cores were diluted with too many other characters, too many storylines going on (introducing the concept of a frontburner and a backburner), etc. Even the soaps that remained at the half-hour tried to mimic this by flooding their canvases with more characters and stories.

 

I wish just one of the hour shows had attempted to cut back down to the half-hour in the 90s just so that we could see what the result would have been. It could have saved daytime.

90-minute...well, I haven't watched a bunch of those episodes of AW, but come on. It has disaster written all over it. If a show was going to try it, I'm glad it was one of the few that truly capitalized on the hour format, but had that caught on? Ew, I don't even want to think about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Half hour is the best historically and even if you look at soaps thriving overseas, it works. Same goes for when Prospect Park rebooted AMC and OLTL. Those shows are new so obviously they weren't perfect, but I thought the format worked better for them even though we knew them in the hour format for so long. I think B&B gives half hour soaps a bad name because they have such a singular focus in the writing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it depends on the show.

 

If I was launching now, I would pick a half hour just for the tighter cast and storytelling.

 

Labine’s GH run was her first hour show, and she often had longer scenes so it still felt full even if there were not as many scenes as a regular hour show.  Great shows if you have strong dialog writers!
 

I can’t imagine something like the Curlee era of GL with a shorter runtime- they had a huge cast but they all mattered at that point.

 

But I also wish OLTL and AMC had tried to do half hours instead of cancelling them both.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Best? 30 minutes always works unless you’re Thudley Bell these days of course. 
 

Actually I’ve always wondered even since GL was trying that “Inside the Light” stories on Wednesdays if 60 min soaps really even need to be on all 5 days a week. 
 

90 minutes of course is wayyyy too long, not even sure why Rauch, Lemny, and NBC thought that was even a good idea at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

30 minutes for sure. 

 

But actually, IMO a 90 minute soap would work really well today. They don't even have to have 65-70 minutes of story. They could spend 40-50 minutes on the show itself and in the remaining time have 2-3 different actors each day answering tweets or podcasting or whatever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Actually, I think it would depend on the medium.  If it were a soap made expressly for television, then I would say 30-minute episodes work best, as writers tend to pad out 60-minute episodes with superfluous scenes and dialogue.  But, if it were a soap being made expressly for online streaming, then I think 15-minute episodes would work better, due to the fact that viewers are being encouraged more and more to download and watch series "on the go" on handheld devices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Emphasis on the work...VANISH.

      Please register in order to view this content

          I've discussed this at length in the monthly threads on the main A stories as established by Week 1...which Martin's secret was one of them. Most soaps would have an A story one week with all the B/C plots just orbitting about. BTG did that well itself in the first two/three weeks. But like I mentioned before one of the A stories (Dani/Bill/Hayley) they can't keep going to that at the moment since it was already overkill by the end of Month 1. The other one...the Silk Press storyline...was really the only one that has been well-paced in my opinion with twists, turns, and builds...including subplots and near-misses. But that was not going to explode before May Sweeps. So that left Martin's secret...which as I said...started off well. I loved how it started with Martin having problems sleeping, but NO images. Then we got sounds. THEN we started to get images. And NOW those images are getting more established. But before we got all that, his storyline...which has been established to be a main one...vanished for a month and a half. While it worked for the storyline since Month 2 gave Martin (and Brandon Clayborn to grow) time to be more established...along with his family...the story of his secret could have also been a story that had a nice slow burn (which I love) to the show while having the other B/C plots orbitting it. Again, not mad at it since it allowed the audience to learn more about Martin and his family life. It also allowed for other B/C plots to grow on the audience. I also think the story development for that A story might have suffered from the writers still trying to find a rhythm that works for this show.   In any case, I also said that I felt they might go old school soap in May. And by old school I meant as an A story is climaxing, the writers take another story that will be the next one and start to build it up again, while also starting another plot as a C plot. And right now, we have the SilkPress storyline climaxing while Martin's nightmares (with images) have finally started to come back into play. I mentioned when I saw the promos of Martin vs Ted that hopefully the reveal would trigger Martin to the point that we FINALLY get to see what he did. So far...how Martin's been acting since the reveal, being so triggered, I still feel that is how we will see how things happened...allowing the next A story to finally take off.    Fingers crossed.   
    • You know what? After all the men she's been with dying, it's only appropriate that she try her hand with women. Only then will she discover how much of a curse she is when it comes to relationships. Of course, I don't think the show would go there, but if they do, I wonder how Carly would react to her daughter being with Robin's.
    • If I'm not mistaken, much of this took place while Claire Labine was writing LOL -- and believe me, it was a very compelling show!  Probably the best soap on the air during Labine's short tenure as head-writer.  I assume Labine left LOL to create Ryan's Hope in 1975, but much of the action your describe seems to be her work.  Not sure why -- maybe some dates are off.
    • Felicia and Rachel were suddenly represented as friends when Mitch came back to Bay City in 1986 in order to try to add tension to the storyline of Mitch and Felicia getting together. I suppose we are lucky that Margaret DePriest didn't eliminate Felicia as she did Quinn and Maisie for being outside the "core families" of McKinnon/Love/Cory.   Felicia was more antagonistic when she was first introduced. She brought Carl to town not knowing he was Donna's ex. She was carrying on an affair with Cass while he was sneaking around with Cecile behind her back and was livid with him when she found out. She was resentful when Cass signed Julia to Winthrop Publishing. She was friendly with Lily though IIRC.     
    • Just coming to comment about Joss and I see there is some conversation. I want to know what's with the subtle "moments" between Joss and Emma. I've been noticing it, but maybe I'm just overthinking it. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • In regards to Sam and Amanda... both of them were immature and crappy people.  She was a spoiled daddy's girl while he had a chip on his shoulder.  Both were stubborn and pigheaded... and I'm thankful I've resisted wearing the 2025 lens of assuming women are empowering and men are toxic.... when quite frankly both men and women could stand to be a little less toxic (in real life, of course).. not on my soaps where toxicity should be the norm.
    • I'm copying and pasting the entire post because, while I enjoyed the watch, I agree with every single one of your points (as I posted above I thought the dialogue tried for clever sophistication without sounding realistic throughout, in fact.)
    • I've just been over Josslyn since her corn costume on Halloween, putting her into a "leading lady" kind of position, simply because she is Carly's daughter, all while backburning other children is annoying AF.
    • Hilarious that Steffy just barges into Brooke's house to see Hope without knocking. Ridge bought it, so I guess she feels she's entitled to.
    • Joss is nowhere near the top of my list to keep currently.  I just wouldn't kill her off and consider bringing her back sometime down the line.  I guess it depends on how well the show is able to develop the next generation of talent with Rocco, Danny, Georgie, etc.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy