Jump to content

The Media/Journalism Thread


Faulkner

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Amy Walter/Cook have been going into overdrive lately about how Harris still isn't beating the polling spread enough, that Trump did not blame Democrats when he was "shot" but now he is so numbers will favor him, etc. I do agree that polling is probably too rosy for Harris but still the propaganda is not subtle.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Why has all the polling been wrong since Dobbs? Not in favor of democrats by the way yet dems have way outperformed.  Are we suggesting that the polling industry is still that broken that none of these polling organizations have fixed their polling to reflect "enthusiasm" or whatever you want to call it to account for the errors in 2016 and 2020? We all believe the polling was correct when Biden was in the race and it was tight with a slight advantage for Trump but it's impossible for the current numbers to be accurate when a democrat is ahead.   I don't believe any of it for one reason DOBBS.  

By the way I am not suggesting ignoring the polls and to not be skeptical. I am probably the biggest skeptic.  I am not paying attention to any of them. But I am looking at what Tom Bonier's stats show and whatever model Chris Bouzy has been using(he won't disclose all of his measurements) who has been saying for months Florida is in play and IOWA of all places will be in play. He's been saying this for months not just now and boom.  I'm a skeptic but might turn into a true believer if his projections are correct.

The answer is work.  Ignore the polls and everyone do what they can. I'm still recovering from some health issues but I intend to goto Iowa to help do canvassing and do phone banking for swing states for NARAL again. Postcards are easy to do. And anyone here who wants information on how to help, is welcome to message me, but there is a load of information available on ways to help online.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Seeing the race barreling in a direction they don't like, Axios is pissed (and ratio'ed).

 

The co-author is of course Alex Thompson, who has been hardcore chumming for drama/oppo on Harris since Biden dropped out (who he relentlessly pursued, particularly after losing a book deal). He hasn't tweeted anything positive for Biden/Harris in... I don't know how long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Of course it'd be fewer, she wasn't the presumptive nominee until a few months ago. Smh. The media expects her and Walz to play catch up with the interviews tally compared to Trump/Biden who have been running for president for well over a year. Thankfully Harris/Walz aren't taking the bait. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think they're angrier that she isn't courting them vs. local media and more diverse journalists (who they consider lesser).

The 'define her' game has largely ended, according to the new polling - Harris' favorables among voters are all up. They've gotten to know her and like her. I do think Harris should do more interviews both as candidate and potential POTUS, but for now the campaign knows Axios, etc. mostly want to play gotcha games and drive narrative with responding to Trump and she's not giving them that oxygen. She's doing media and interviews her way.

Harris has an interview with Oprah today, I believe.

Meanwhile: The ever-angrier Jonathan Martin continues to play "Here's How Bernie Trump Can Still Win", inexplicably citing states that Trump lost 2 out of 3 last time as an 'electoral firewall':

 

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This attempt to ignore it won't matter, btw. Nuzzi has enough friends in the Beltway club who are all struggling to report on this right now, but I am willing to bet a lot of other dirt on her has gone underreported til now and will begin coming out more and more (in addition to her existing bad priors).

They will attempt to rehab Nuzzi - she will likely crop up as a panelist on CNN or MSNBC or something in the next 6-18 months, she will maybe get a confessional piece in the Atlantic or somewhere. People will signal boost it. But she can't hide what she is anymore or what she's always been. Nuzzi's final destination has always been the right wing fever swamp, just like people like Bari Weiss, Taibbi, etc. I knew she would end up there eventually and she's been trending there for some time, going more and more mask off even in polite Beltway circles. So any rehab won't last. She will be on Newsmax in 5 years, maybe ahead of schedule from what I'd always expected. Lara Loganville.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Finland seemed such an odd choice for a location shoot. ATWT went to Greece and later Spain while GL had Tenerife and there were others in that timeframe. But Finland not being a known tourist destination or offering the tropical/sunny atmosphere usually associated with location shoots seems off brand. Maybe they were negotiating a deal with a tourist association and it fell through.
    • I was talking about 1986, but the glimpses of 1982 are about the same. 
    • I skimmed some of the 1982 synopses; Steve was planning on an opening an office in Finland, and I think Jim went there as part of the preparation. That probably was a big issue; AW had already gone to San Diego that year, with Rachel/Steve/Mitch. And to upstate NY with Pete and Diana. I wonder if upstate was as expensive lol  AW in 1982 has always fascinated me, because of how messy it was 
    • That makes sense. What a messy time for the show. And any changes they made were mostly for the worse.
    • The transition from Neal to Adam was very abrupt, and to be honest my theory is that the character of Neal was designed so that we think he is super shady but then it turns out that he was on the side of good all along so Neal could have seamlessly become a hero of the BCPD with no need for Adam. I don't know whether Robert Lupone was hired on a short contract or if he was fired from a longer-term contract because they decided they wanted someone who was more of a leading man type, but I can imagine a scenario where Charles Grant did both the undercover Egyptian treasure/flirt with Victoria and the straighter-arrow day to day police investigation. But in my imagined scenario the MJ prostitution plotline probably doesn't exist and instead he probably continues a relationship with Victoria. The story seems very odd to me. I assume that David Canary would have been included only because a plotline where Steve is going to Finland in which only Rachel is seen in actual Finland seems unlikely. The synopses explicitly mention that Alice can't go with Steve but would whoever was playing Alice at that time have had the kind of clout to get the remote cancelled? It also strikes me as unlikely that production would have approved the expensive location shoot and *then* cancelled it only because of jealousy. It seems more likely that they rejected it because of the expense but then the jealousy part got added to the gossip speculatively, possibly because while it was being worked out they justified not including more castmembers because of the expense. 
    • My comment has nothing to do with cast resentment, but does relate to the Finland location shoot: It may be a coincidence, but Jim Matthews died in Finland in 1982.  Hugh Marlowe's final episode was in April 1982, but the character probably didn't die untll May or June. (I'm unable to find the character's date of death, only the date of Marlowe's final episode). SInce Jim and Rachel had very little interaction after around 1975, it is unlikely Jim's death in Finland had any connection to Rachel's potential visit, but the choice to have Jim die in that location at that time is a head-scratcher.  I'm sure the writers sent Jim on an extended trip (and off-screen) because of Marlowe's illness.  But Finland seems like a strange choice considering the (then) recently cancelled location shoot.  
    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
    • Brooke did ads before ATWT too. That probably helped get her the job. After ATWT she seemed to branch more into hosting, along with ads.  I think I saw Kelley in an ad or two, but you're right she wasn't on as much. 
    •   Thanks for sharing these. I wonder if Charles might have been in the running for Adam. I know Preacher was a bit of a bad boy at times on EON, but Neal seemed to be a step down, and Robert Lupone had played a similar part on AMC. Given the huge cast turnover at this point I wonder who thought they had been there long enough to go.  Laura Malone/Chris Rich would get a remote within the next year. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy