Jump to content

Non-Hollywood Sexual Assault & Sexual Harassment


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 177
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 4 weeks later...
  • Members

I only watched a couple seasons of So You Think You Can Dance and he struck me somewhat odd, even from a distance. He reminds me of a certain type of theater and performing arts person who is so overconfident in his/her/their abilities and importance that they freely "take liberties", even when it infringes on other people's boundaries, as they have no real boundaries themselves-they've never been to taught to have any regard for boundaries, as they've been told how massively talented they are--all their lives. I have both had to perform and work with these types. Better late than never, I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • Members

The tweets had pictures of the criminal and I didn't want to post his picture.

Regarding the Duggar family who have bunch of kids, and had a reality show, and consider themselves to be religious.

Here is a summary:


December 9, 2021

The jury has found Josh Duggar GUILTY on both charges of receipt and possession of child pornography.
He was taken into custody after the verdict was announced.
Sentencing will be in four months.

Josh's father, Jim Bob Duggar is running in a special election for a vacant state Senate seat in Northwest Arkansas.

Jim Bob Duggar is one of four Republicans seeking the party’s nomination. Early voting began Tuesday, December 7 and the primary is set for December 14. Jim Bob previously served in the Arkansas House.

A reporter caught up with Jim Bob as he was walking out of the courthouse after his son Josh was found guilty. The reporter ask Jim Bob for comment and if this would impact his run for state senate, and he did not reply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The media is too busy focusing on the many crimes of Jussie Smollett to pay anything more than minimal attention to pedos like Duggar.

Personally, I could care less about either but it is fascinating how hypocritical media can be, depending on the color of the perpetrator.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

 

 

 

“With the Queen’s approval and agreement, the Duke of York’s military affiliations and royal patronages have been returned to the Queen. The Duke of York will continue not to undertake any public duties and is defending this case as a private citizen.”

"Returned to the Queen" means that the queen will take all those military affiliations and royal patronages back to herself .... and then she will redistribute them to the other members of the Royal Family.

Andrew will stop using the title 'His Royal Highness' in any official capacity. So technically he still has the title but won't use it.

All of this comes after a letter signed by more than 150 Royal Navy, RAF and Army veterans asked the Queen to strip Prince Andrew of his eight British military appointments.

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The palace statement that Andrew is on his own as a private citizen to defend himself in the trial -- I guess the palace is *finally* acknowledging the problem?

Stripping Andrew of all those patronages and military honors, and letting him technically remain "his royal highness" without using the title...
That's *exactly* what the Queen did to Harry and Meghan last year.

Just sayin' that England rushed to disempower Harry and Meghan who did nothing wrong, they simply left the UK.

Yet they waited all this time to disempower Andrew. The denial was strong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • This makes me think of that famous quote from COOL HAND LUKE,  "What we've got here is failure to communicate." I did not bring up "apparently" to try to get across either truth or validity, but doubt. If I had been sure, I would have said something entirely different. But, I'm not trying to argue, I hear you & I will comply. Besides that, I will endeavor to word things differently. I am never against trying to improve. 
    • That’s been my main issue with his response. It didn’t feel that earned by what came before. Definitely needed to see more of the Richardsons as a full family unit prior to all of this.
    • Bingo! I thought the exact same thing. Martin's anger feels so out of place, because we've hardly seen him interact with his parents. Vernon and him have more of a father/son relationship and we've seen their dynamic more fully play out. While obviously Ted and Marton are father and son, it felt a bit empty because we haven't really seen them bond or truly connect in any scenes.
    • Leslie inferred over 20 years ago, so Eva and Kat are over 20 at least 
    • As it happens, 40 years ago this week, ABC and CBS revealed their 1985-86 fall schedules. NBC revealed theirs the week before. ABC's would end up changing. The original plan for Tuesdays was to have Diff'rent Strokes lead the night, with He's the Mayor at 8:30, followed by Who's the Boss at 9, Growing Pains at 9:30, and Moonlighting at 10. There was some surprise over MacGruder & Loud not getting renewed, but it was considered part of Aaron Spelling's declining influence at the network. Yes, Dynasty was still a hit (for a while longer), but Aaron's shows steadily took up less and less of the schedule. Fall 1984: Seven hours, five of which were new programming (Dynasty, Hotel, Glitter, Matt Houston, T.J. Hooker, The Love Boat, Finder of Lost Loves; MacGruder & Loud aired at midseason, by which time Glitter was gone.). Fall 1985: Five hours, two of which were new programming (Dynasty, Hotel, The Colbys, Hollywood Beat, The Love Boat). Fall 1986: Three-and-a-half hours, a half-hour of which was new programming (Dynasty, Hotel, The Colbys, Life With Lucy). Fall 1987: Two hours, none of which was new programming (Dynasty and Hotel; HeartBeat premiered at midseason). Fall-winter 1988: Two hours, none of which was new programming (Dynasty and HeartBeat). This led to Variety's infamous shady headline in spring 1989: "Aaron's Dynasty Over"
    • I hope for a multi-year renewal, too! This is the only show I've been excited to see the next episode in forever. Considering their demos are quite decent. the initial episodes showed there is still an interest in daytime, and it has helped to boost the rest of the soap line up at times, it should be around for a while. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • I agree.  How many times did we have to watch Bobby vs. J.R., or Blake vs. Alexis, knowing that nothing would change at the end, and that everything would go back to status quo, so that they could fight the same, exhausting battles all over again?  If nothing else, I give FC and KL credit for trying to keep things fresh, even if I think FC, in particular, went too far in the other direction and became unrecognizable even to the most diehard fans. Exactly.  Plus, because viewers were so burned out by the kind of serialized storytelling that was beginning to affect even half-hour comedies, I think MSW represented a nice change of pace.  You didn't have to watch every week, or watch from the beginning of each season, to know what was going on with Miss Fletcher.  Instead, you could watch a complete story in one episode, de-stress from whatever had happened in your own life last week, gear yourself up for the week ahead, and be okay. If you notice, though, there were differences between those two shows and what Aaron Spelling had produced in the past.  For one thing, there was a greater emphasis on youth; and while characters on 90210 and MP certainly had more disposable incomes than the average viewer, their wealth wasn't as opulent as what we'd seen on DYNASTY or on "Hart to Hart."  Even the battles among Alison, Amanda, Billy and others at that advertising agency weren't as histrionic as those between Denver Carrington and ColbyCo.
    • I saw a conversation yesterday with Liam with the 7 dwarves hat and Steffy -  I know she did not say re: Hope and Liam said - well look at Finn and you forgave him right?      I know I did not hear Steffy say “well but you can’t compare that to…”  For *uck sake someone call the bitch out!?     You’re right, we shouldn’t compare your forgiveness for the dude with devil spawn seed whose daughter locked you in a cage along with crazy stepmom/mom/Grandmother who has also SHOT YOU BOTH - and multiple murder attempts but you have to exist with them / Hope’s part in a takeover which you know was FAR LESS THAN CARTER BECAUSE HOPE IS NOT AN ATTORNEY…. Goodness no, no the same thing at alllllllll.   When they do Steffy’s absence at least let it be because they all find out what a manipulative ho she is in her own right.      
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy