Jump to content

Dallas Discussion Thread


John

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • 4 weeks later...
  • Members
  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

1989/90 Dallas was regularly being beaten by Perfect Strangers at 9 pm and with the March 1990 move to 10 pm it was regularly being beaten by 20/20. Fall 1990 at 10 pm it was regularly being beaten by 20/20 and 1991 return to 9 pm it was being regularly beaten by Perfect Strangers. I was floored when I saw that twice in 1991 the 9 pm time slot winner was Family Matters. It's one thing for big bad Larry Hagman to get knocked off the throne at CBS by sweet unassuming yet savage Angela Lansbury, but another thing entirely to get beaten in the time slot by Urkel.

CBS owned Friday from 1980-1985. Miami Vice had 1985/86 as the new hotness but then NBC messed up their Friday line up in Fall 1986. ABC launched TGIF in Fall 1989 and it became a 1990s staple.

Edited by kalbir
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Dallas was circling the drain during those final years. I guess Katzman felt as long as Hagman and Duffy were still around viewers would continue to watch whatever stupid crappy storylines they were throwing out there. 

Duffy returning to the show was a huge mistake. They bent over backwards to pay him an outlandish amount of money so Hagman could go back to the boys club/ playground behind the scenes at the cost of losing the rest of their original cast. Katzman had rid of Capice and did whatever he wanted. 

I found Duffy downright insufferable after his return. He had this smug arrogance about him and bled over into his portrayal of Bobby.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank you for reminding me, @kalbir, I totally had forgotten that, lol.

ICAM.  Like you said, @SoapDope, Larry Hagman had his onscreen sparring partner back, but I think the audience was pissed off at the suggestion that they had wasted an entire season of their lives watching that show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You're welcome @Khan 

Please register in order to view this content

Like I pointed out before, it's quite telling that none of the long-time female cast members were part of the main cast in the final season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

CBS strangely gave Dallas a two year renewal in the spring of 1989. Apparently they had other issues to deal with. And they were very hands off with the show, particularly for the last season. So Katzman and Hagman were allowed to run the show into the ground. Contrast this with Knots, where David Jacobs temporarily shut down the show in its penultimate season for a reset because he felt the showrunners had lost their way.

Frankly, they should have shut down Dallas during the 1987-88 season, because that’s when there was a big plunge in both the ratings and the show’s quality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I assume it must've been a way to control costs - as you said, they had bigger issues to deal with and agreeing with a certain licensing cost from Lorimar probably seemed like a good deal. Of course, Lorimar just kept hacking away at the shows cast to try and keep a profit on the show ultimately not even using the cheaper cast members in all episodes of season 14.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We all know Fall 1987-Spring 1991 was CBS primetime third place mess era. I don't know what was going on in the business end at CBS but in the programming end there was Nielsen people meters, 1988 writer's strike, and the primetime line up fell into either aging/fading shows or new shows that weren't showing much growth.

Dallas goes off the rails in the aftermath of Pamela disappearance and was effectively over with Sue Ellen departure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Dallas sent viewers an unintentional subliminal message after the dream season:  "Don't take any of this seriously.  We don't know what we're doing. We're writing by the seat of our pants."

I was glad to have Duffy back (and thrilled to have Barbara Bel Geddes back on the show), but my interest began to wane drastically after the dream season, because there was no longer any pretense of "art" or "carefully plotted stories" after such a transparent reversal.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • To clarify, we could argue about the necessity to have John Black speak while in hospital, but the body created an opportunity for people to touch him, and move around him.  Even though I never totally suspended my disbelief, I appreciated their creative choice to form a visual representation of loss.  Certainly there were other ways to tell this story, but it will stay with me because those production choices enabled these performances. However, with disdain, I note that Days has found an odd middle ground between a flashback and a montage.  I define a flashback as least a couple of rounds of dialogue, if not a whole scene.  And a montage would be a visual snippet without much dialogue.  But, these were often just a single line, or an entrance.  It felt like a bit of a tease, and made me wish that Peacock had curated a playlist of John Black's Greatest Hits, like they do for some Bravo shows or SNL characters.  OT - but they have yet to maximize that platform.
    • It's tough for me because I feel like this has always been Lulu. She used to be even worse, slut-shaming, verbally abusing other women, and always being written as being in the right. They should let Brook Lynn get dirtier, but I think the material of Lulu digging and being self-righteous, making everything worse even while not intending to do so, but also not being as in the wrong as Dante thinks she is, all makes sense for her. But I don't have as much experience with Lulu as a lot of fans as I just could never stomach her beyond the time she was a mute kid, so I don't have much right to speak.
    • Thanks @JAS0N47 for all the ratings!   All My Children hits Number 1 in the ratings for the first time in its history during the week of 8/20/73-8/20/73!
    • I think the writing is slanted against Lulu.  I don't think there is an issue with the character in general.  I just think Lulu comes doesn't get many layers or nuance in her writing.  Lulu becomes obnoxious and a bully to Brook Lynn and both characters SHOULD have flaws.
    • Totally here for Anita dumping Sharon in the past for first Dante Green, and then Vernon...
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Hey Anita and Sharon

      Please register in order to view this content

        
    • Amanda Setton and Rena Sofer was once again really good in today's episode.  As a Lucky/Liz fan, I didn't like their scenes either.  And they are nowhere near a proposal because they haven't been given a real story.  
    • I don't think Lulu is written that badly.  Lucky they do seem to have no real interest in. I wonder if this is another story they have decided to wrap up abruptly as it makes zero sense to have what would have clearly been serious conflict between Liz and Lucky just get shrugged off by her. Maybe the intense viewer negativity toward Kristina got through to them.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy